Cargando…
Reconstruction of Through-and-through Oromandibular Defect: Comparison of Four Different Techniques
BACKGROUND: Through-and-through oromandibular defects originate from surgical intervention of tumors of the oral cavity involving external skin, soft tissue, bone, and oral lining. Reconstruction of such composite defects is primarily achieved by 4 methods using distinct flaps in Chang Gung Memorial...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5340474/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28280659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001212 |
_version_ | 1782512837854232576 |
---|---|
author | Wu, John Chung-Han Lee, Yi-Chieh Cheng, Yu-Chun Wu, Chih-Wei |
author_facet | Wu, John Chung-Han Lee, Yi-Chieh Cheng, Yu-Chun Wu, Chih-Wei |
author_sort | Wu, John Chung-Han |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Through-and-through oromandibular defects originate from surgical intervention of tumors of the oral cavity involving external skin, soft tissue, bone, and oral lining. Reconstruction of such composite defects is primarily achieved by 4 methods using distinct flaps in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, including a single anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap, a single fibula flap, an osteomyocutaneous peroneal artery-based combined flap, and a combination of a fibular flap and an ALT flap, also known as a double flap. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 41 patients with through-and-through oromandibular defects reconstructed in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou branch from July 2007 to June 2009 using either of the 4 flaps were evaluated. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to the choice of flap, and their surgical outcomes, immediate and late complications, and their general condition were studied. Group 1 included 12 patients reconstructed with a single ALT flap, whereas group 2 included 15 patients using fibular flaps. Group 3 included 8 patients with osteomyocutaneous peroneal artery-based combined flaps, and group 4 included 6 patients who underwent reconstruction with double flaps. RESULTS: Among all statistical results, we found that none of the differences regarding either patient demography or surgical outcomes between groups were statistically significant, except for squamous cell carcinoma staging. CONCLUSIONS: Although the results were insignificant, trends within the data could be seen that support previous notions regarding each reconstruction method. For future studies, we strongly recommend a larger sample size. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5340474 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53404742017-03-09 Reconstruction of Through-and-through Oromandibular Defect: Comparison of Four Different Techniques Wu, John Chung-Han Lee, Yi-Chieh Cheng, Yu-Chun Wu, Chih-Wei Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Through-and-through oromandibular defects originate from surgical intervention of tumors of the oral cavity involving external skin, soft tissue, bone, and oral lining. Reconstruction of such composite defects is primarily achieved by 4 methods using distinct flaps in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, including a single anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap, a single fibula flap, an osteomyocutaneous peroneal artery-based combined flap, and a combination of a fibular flap and an ALT flap, also known as a double flap. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 41 patients with through-and-through oromandibular defects reconstructed in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou branch from July 2007 to June 2009 using either of the 4 flaps were evaluated. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to the choice of flap, and their surgical outcomes, immediate and late complications, and their general condition were studied. Group 1 included 12 patients reconstructed with a single ALT flap, whereas group 2 included 15 patients using fibular flaps. Group 3 included 8 patients with osteomyocutaneous peroneal artery-based combined flaps, and group 4 included 6 patients who underwent reconstruction with double flaps. RESULTS: Among all statistical results, we found that none of the differences regarding either patient demography or surgical outcomes between groups were statistically significant, except for squamous cell carcinoma staging. CONCLUSIONS: Although the results were insignificant, trends within the data could be seen that support previous notions regarding each reconstruction method. For future studies, we strongly recommend a larger sample size. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5340474/ /pubmed/28280659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001212 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Wu, John Chung-Han Lee, Yi-Chieh Cheng, Yu-Chun Wu, Chih-Wei Reconstruction of Through-and-through Oromandibular Defect: Comparison of Four Different Techniques |
title | Reconstruction of Through-and-through Oromandibular Defect: Comparison of Four Different Techniques |
title_full | Reconstruction of Through-and-through Oromandibular Defect: Comparison of Four Different Techniques |
title_fullStr | Reconstruction of Through-and-through Oromandibular Defect: Comparison of Four Different Techniques |
title_full_unstemmed | Reconstruction of Through-and-through Oromandibular Defect: Comparison of Four Different Techniques |
title_short | Reconstruction of Through-and-through Oromandibular Defect: Comparison of Four Different Techniques |
title_sort | reconstruction of through-and-through oromandibular defect: comparison of four different techniques |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5340474/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28280659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001212 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wujohnchunghan reconstructionofthroughandthroughoromandibulardefectcomparisonoffourdifferenttechniques AT leeyichieh reconstructionofthroughandthroughoromandibulardefectcomparisonoffourdifferenttechniques AT chengyuchun reconstructionofthroughandthroughoromandibulardefectcomparisonoffourdifferenttechniques AT wuchihwei reconstructionofthroughandthroughoromandibulardefectcomparisonoffourdifferenttechniques |