Cargando…
Outcomes of gastrointestinal defect closure with an over-the-scope clip system in a multicenter experience: An analysis of a successful suction method
AIM: To demonstrate the clinical outcomes of a multicenter experience and to suggest guidelines for choosing a suction method. METHODS: This retrospective study at 5 medical centers involved 58 consecutive patients undergoing over-the-scope clips (OTSCs) placement. The overall rates of technical suc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5340817/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28321166 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i9.1645 |
_version_ | 1782512875138449408 |
---|---|
author | Kobara, Hideki Mori, Hirohito Fujihara, Shintaro Nishiyama, Noriko Chiyo, Taiga Yamada, Takayoshi Fujiwara, Masao Okano, Keiichi Suzuki, Yasuyuki Murota, Masayuki Ikeda, Yoshitaka Oryu, Makoto AboEllail, Mohamed Masaki, Tsutomu |
author_facet | Kobara, Hideki Mori, Hirohito Fujihara, Shintaro Nishiyama, Noriko Chiyo, Taiga Yamada, Takayoshi Fujiwara, Masao Okano, Keiichi Suzuki, Yasuyuki Murota, Masayuki Ikeda, Yoshitaka Oryu, Makoto AboEllail, Mohamed Masaki, Tsutomu |
author_sort | Kobara, Hideki |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To demonstrate the clinical outcomes of a multicenter experience and to suggest guidelines for choosing a suction method. METHODS: This retrospective study at 5 medical centers involved 58 consecutive patients undergoing over-the-scope clips (OTSCs) placement. The overall rates of technical success (TSR), clinical success (CSR), complications, and procedure time were analyzed as major outcomes. Subsequently, 56 patients, excluding two cases that used the Anchor device, were divided into two groups: 14 cases of simple suction (SS-group) and 42 cases using the Twin Grasper (TG-group). Secondary evaluation was performed to clarify the predictors of OTSC success. RESULTS: The TSR, CSR, complication rate, and median procedure time were 89.7%, 84.5%, 1.8%, and 8 (range 1-36) min, respectively, demonstrating good outcomes. However, significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of the mean procedure time (5.9 min vs 14.1 min). The CSR of the SS- and TG-groups among cases with a maximum defect size ≤ 10 mm and immediate or acute refractory bleeding was 100%, which suggests that SS is a better method than TG in terms of time efficacy. The CSR in the SS-group (78.6%), despite the technical success of the SS method (TSR, 100%), tended to decrease due to delayed leakage compared to that in the TG-group (TSR, CSR; 88.1%), indicating that TG may be desirable for leaks and fistulae with defects of the entire layer. CONCLUSION: OTSC system is a safe and effective therapeutic option for gastrointestinal defects. Individualized selection of the suction method based on particular clinical conditions may contribute to the improvement of OTSC success. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5340817 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53408172017-03-20 Outcomes of gastrointestinal defect closure with an over-the-scope clip system in a multicenter experience: An analysis of a successful suction method Kobara, Hideki Mori, Hirohito Fujihara, Shintaro Nishiyama, Noriko Chiyo, Taiga Yamada, Takayoshi Fujiwara, Masao Okano, Keiichi Suzuki, Yasuyuki Murota, Masayuki Ikeda, Yoshitaka Oryu, Makoto AboEllail, Mohamed Masaki, Tsutomu World J Gastroenterol Clinical Trials Study AIM: To demonstrate the clinical outcomes of a multicenter experience and to suggest guidelines for choosing a suction method. METHODS: This retrospective study at 5 medical centers involved 58 consecutive patients undergoing over-the-scope clips (OTSCs) placement. The overall rates of technical success (TSR), clinical success (CSR), complications, and procedure time were analyzed as major outcomes. Subsequently, 56 patients, excluding two cases that used the Anchor device, were divided into two groups: 14 cases of simple suction (SS-group) and 42 cases using the Twin Grasper (TG-group). Secondary evaluation was performed to clarify the predictors of OTSC success. RESULTS: The TSR, CSR, complication rate, and median procedure time were 89.7%, 84.5%, 1.8%, and 8 (range 1-36) min, respectively, demonstrating good outcomes. However, significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of the mean procedure time (5.9 min vs 14.1 min). The CSR of the SS- and TG-groups among cases with a maximum defect size ≤ 10 mm and immediate or acute refractory bleeding was 100%, which suggests that SS is a better method than TG in terms of time efficacy. The CSR in the SS-group (78.6%), despite the technical success of the SS method (TSR, 100%), tended to decrease due to delayed leakage compared to that in the TG-group (TSR, CSR; 88.1%), indicating that TG may be desirable for leaks and fistulae with defects of the entire layer. CONCLUSION: OTSC system is a safe and effective therapeutic option for gastrointestinal defects. Individualized selection of the suction method based on particular clinical conditions may contribute to the improvement of OTSC success. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2017-03-07 2017-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5340817/ /pubmed/28321166 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i9.1645 Text en ©The Author(s) 2017. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Trials Study Kobara, Hideki Mori, Hirohito Fujihara, Shintaro Nishiyama, Noriko Chiyo, Taiga Yamada, Takayoshi Fujiwara, Masao Okano, Keiichi Suzuki, Yasuyuki Murota, Masayuki Ikeda, Yoshitaka Oryu, Makoto AboEllail, Mohamed Masaki, Tsutomu Outcomes of gastrointestinal defect closure with an over-the-scope clip system in a multicenter experience: An analysis of a successful suction method |
title | Outcomes of gastrointestinal defect closure with an over-the-scope clip system in a multicenter experience: An analysis of a successful suction method |
title_full | Outcomes of gastrointestinal defect closure with an over-the-scope clip system in a multicenter experience: An analysis of a successful suction method |
title_fullStr | Outcomes of gastrointestinal defect closure with an over-the-scope clip system in a multicenter experience: An analysis of a successful suction method |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcomes of gastrointestinal defect closure with an over-the-scope clip system in a multicenter experience: An analysis of a successful suction method |
title_short | Outcomes of gastrointestinal defect closure with an over-the-scope clip system in a multicenter experience: An analysis of a successful suction method |
title_sort | outcomes of gastrointestinal defect closure with an over-the-scope clip system in a multicenter experience: an analysis of a successful suction method |
topic | Clinical Trials Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5340817/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28321166 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i9.1645 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kobarahideki outcomesofgastrointestinaldefectclosurewithanoverthescopeclipsysteminamulticenterexperienceananalysisofasuccessfulsuctionmethod AT morihirohito outcomesofgastrointestinaldefectclosurewithanoverthescopeclipsysteminamulticenterexperienceananalysisofasuccessfulsuctionmethod AT fujiharashintaro outcomesofgastrointestinaldefectclosurewithanoverthescopeclipsysteminamulticenterexperienceananalysisofasuccessfulsuctionmethod AT nishiyamanoriko outcomesofgastrointestinaldefectclosurewithanoverthescopeclipsysteminamulticenterexperienceananalysisofasuccessfulsuctionmethod AT chiyotaiga outcomesofgastrointestinaldefectclosurewithanoverthescopeclipsysteminamulticenterexperienceananalysisofasuccessfulsuctionmethod AT yamadatakayoshi outcomesofgastrointestinaldefectclosurewithanoverthescopeclipsysteminamulticenterexperienceananalysisofasuccessfulsuctionmethod AT fujiwaramasao outcomesofgastrointestinaldefectclosurewithanoverthescopeclipsysteminamulticenterexperienceananalysisofasuccessfulsuctionmethod AT okanokeiichi outcomesofgastrointestinaldefectclosurewithanoverthescopeclipsysteminamulticenterexperienceananalysisofasuccessfulsuctionmethod AT suzukiyasuyuki outcomesofgastrointestinaldefectclosurewithanoverthescopeclipsysteminamulticenterexperienceananalysisofasuccessfulsuctionmethod AT murotamasayuki outcomesofgastrointestinaldefectclosurewithanoverthescopeclipsysteminamulticenterexperienceananalysisofasuccessfulsuctionmethod AT ikedayoshitaka outcomesofgastrointestinaldefectclosurewithanoverthescopeclipsysteminamulticenterexperienceananalysisofasuccessfulsuctionmethod AT oryumakoto outcomesofgastrointestinaldefectclosurewithanoverthescopeclipsysteminamulticenterexperienceananalysisofasuccessfulsuctionmethod AT aboellailmohamed outcomesofgastrointestinaldefectclosurewithanoverthescopeclipsysteminamulticenterexperienceananalysisofasuccessfulsuctionmethod AT masakitsutomu outcomesofgastrointestinaldefectclosurewithanoverthescopeclipsysteminamulticenterexperienceananalysisofasuccessfulsuctionmethod |