Cargando…

Outcomes of gastrointestinal defect closure with an over-the-scope clip system in a multicenter experience: An analysis of a successful suction method

AIM: To demonstrate the clinical outcomes of a multicenter experience and to suggest guidelines for choosing a suction method. METHODS: This retrospective study at 5 medical centers involved 58 consecutive patients undergoing over-the-scope clips (OTSCs) placement. The overall rates of technical suc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kobara, Hideki, Mori, Hirohito, Fujihara, Shintaro, Nishiyama, Noriko, Chiyo, Taiga, Yamada, Takayoshi, Fujiwara, Masao, Okano, Keiichi, Suzuki, Yasuyuki, Murota, Masayuki, Ikeda, Yoshitaka, Oryu, Makoto, AboEllail, Mohamed, Masaki, Tsutomu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5340817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28321166
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i9.1645
_version_ 1782512875138449408
author Kobara, Hideki
Mori, Hirohito
Fujihara, Shintaro
Nishiyama, Noriko
Chiyo, Taiga
Yamada, Takayoshi
Fujiwara, Masao
Okano, Keiichi
Suzuki, Yasuyuki
Murota, Masayuki
Ikeda, Yoshitaka
Oryu, Makoto
AboEllail, Mohamed
Masaki, Tsutomu
author_facet Kobara, Hideki
Mori, Hirohito
Fujihara, Shintaro
Nishiyama, Noriko
Chiyo, Taiga
Yamada, Takayoshi
Fujiwara, Masao
Okano, Keiichi
Suzuki, Yasuyuki
Murota, Masayuki
Ikeda, Yoshitaka
Oryu, Makoto
AboEllail, Mohamed
Masaki, Tsutomu
author_sort Kobara, Hideki
collection PubMed
description AIM: To demonstrate the clinical outcomes of a multicenter experience and to suggest guidelines for choosing a suction method. METHODS: This retrospective study at 5 medical centers involved 58 consecutive patients undergoing over-the-scope clips (OTSCs) placement. The overall rates of technical success (TSR), clinical success (CSR), complications, and procedure time were analyzed as major outcomes. Subsequently, 56 patients, excluding two cases that used the Anchor device, were divided into two groups: 14 cases of simple suction (SS-group) and 42 cases using the Twin Grasper (TG-group). Secondary evaluation was performed to clarify the predictors of OTSC success. RESULTS: The TSR, CSR, complication rate, and median procedure time were 89.7%, 84.5%, 1.8%, and 8 (range 1-36) min, respectively, demonstrating good outcomes. However, significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of the mean procedure time (5.9 min vs 14.1 min). The CSR of the SS- and TG-groups among cases with a maximum defect size ≤ 10 mm and immediate or acute refractory bleeding was 100%, which suggests that SS is a better method than TG in terms of time efficacy. The CSR in the SS-group (78.6%), despite the technical success of the SS method (TSR, 100%), tended to decrease due to delayed leakage compared to that in the TG-group (TSR, CSR; 88.1%), indicating that TG may be desirable for leaks and fistulae with defects of the entire layer. CONCLUSION: OTSC system is a safe and effective therapeutic option for gastrointestinal defects. Individualized selection of the suction method based on particular clinical conditions may contribute to the improvement of OTSC success.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5340817
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53408172017-03-20 Outcomes of gastrointestinal defect closure with an over-the-scope clip system in a multicenter experience: An analysis of a successful suction method Kobara, Hideki Mori, Hirohito Fujihara, Shintaro Nishiyama, Noriko Chiyo, Taiga Yamada, Takayoshi Fujiwara, Masao Okano, Keiichi Suzuki, Yasuyuki Murota, Masayuki Ikeda, Yoshitaka Oryu, Makoto AboEllail, Mohamed Masaki, Tsutomu World J Gastroenterol Clinical Trials Study AIM: To demonstrate the clinical outcomes of a multicenter experience and to suggest guidelines for choosing a suction method. METHODS: This retrospective study at 5 medical centers involved 58 consecutive patients undergoing over-the-scope clips (OTSCs) placement. The overall rates of technical success (TSR), clinical success (CSR), complications, and procedure time were analyzed as major outcomes. Subsequently, 56 patients, excluding two cases that used the Anchor device, were divided into two groups: 14 cases of simple suction (SS-group) and 42 cases using the Twin Grasper (TG-group). Secondary evaluation was performed to clarify the predictors of OTSC success. RESULTS: The TSR, CSR, complication rate, and median procedure time were 89.7%, 84.5%, 1.8%, and 8 (range 1-36) min, respectively, demonstrating good outcomes. However, significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of the mean procedure time (5.9 min vs 14.1 min). The CSR of the SS- and TG-groups among cases with a maximum defect size ≤ 10 mm and immediate or acute refractory bleeding was 100%, which suggests that SS is a better method than TG in terms of time efficacy. The CSR in the SS-group (78.6%), despite the technical success of the SS method (TSR, 100%), tended to decrease due to delayed leakage compared to that in the TG-group (TSR, CSR; 88.1%), indicating that TG may be desirable for leaks and fistulae with defects of the entire layer. CONCLUSION: OTSC system is a safe and effective therapeutic option for gastrointestinal defects. Individualized selection of the suction method based on particular clinical conditions may contribute to the improvement of OTSC success. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2017-03-07 2017-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5340817/ /pubmed/28321166 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i9.1645 Text en ©The Author(s) 2017. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Clinical Trials Study
Kobara, Hideki
Mori, Hirohito
Fujihara, Shintaro
Nishiyama, Noriko
Chiyo, Taiga
Yamada, Takayoshi
Fujiwara, Masao
Okano, Keiichi
Suzuki, Yasuyuki
Murota, Masayuki
Ikeda, Yoshitaka
Oryu, Makoto
AboEllail, Mohamed
Masaki, Tsutomu
Outcomes of gastrointestinal defect closure with an over-the-scope clip system in a multicenter experience: An analysis of a successful suction method
title Outcomes of gastrointestinal defect closure with an over-the-scope clip system in a multicenter experience: An analysis of a successful suction method
title_full Outcomes of gastrointestinal defect closure with an over-the-scope clip system in a multicenter experience: An analysis of a successful suction method
title_fullStr Outcomes of gastrointestinal defect closure with an over-the-scope clip system in a multicenter experience: An analysis of a successful suction method
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of gastrointestinal defect closure with an over-the-scope clip system in a multicenter experience: An analysis of a successful suction method
title_short Outcomes of gastrointestinal defect closure with an over-the-scope clip system in a multicenter experience: An analysis of a successful suction method
title_sort outcomes of gastrointestinal defect closure with an over-the-scope clip system in a multicenter experience: an analysis of a successful suction method
topic Clinical Trials Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5340817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28321166
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i9.1645
work_keys_str_mv AT kobarahideki outcomesofgastrointestinaldefectclosurewithanoverthescopeclipsysteminamulticenterexperienceananalysisofasuccessfulsuctionmethod
AT morihirohito outcomesofgastrointestinaldefectclosurewithanoverthescopeclipsysteminamulticenterexperienceananalysisofasuccessfulsuctionmethod
AT fujiharashintaro outcomesofgastrointestinaldefectclosurewithanoverthescopeclipsysteminamulticenterexperienceananalysisofasuccessfulsuctionmethod
AT nishiyamanoriko outcomesofgastrointestinaldefectclosurewithanoverthescopeclipsysteminamulticenterexperienceananalysisofasuccessfulsuctionmethod
AT chiyotaiga outcomesofgastrointestinaldefectclosurewithanoverthescopeclipsysteminamulticenterexperienceananalysisofasuccessfulsuctionmethod
AT yamadatakayoshi outcomesofgastrointestinaldefectclosurewithanoverthescopeclipsysteminamulticenterexperienceananalysisofasuccessfulsuctionmethod
AT fujiwaramasao outcomesofgastrointestinaldefectclosurewithanoverthescopeclipsysteminamulticenterexperienceananalysisofasuccessfulsuctionmethod
AT okanokeiichi outcomesofgastrointestinaldefectclosurewithanoverthescopeclipsysteminamulticenterexperienceananalysisofasuccessfulsuctionmethod
AT suzukiyasuyuki outcomesofgastrointestinaldefectclosurewithanoverthescopeclipsysteminamulticenterexperienceananalysisofasuccessfulsuctionmethod
AT murotamasayuki outcomesofgastrointestinaldefectclosurewithanoverthescopeclipsysteminamulticenterexperienceananalysisofasuccessfulsuctionmethod
AT ikedayoshitaka outcomesofgastrointestinaldefectclosurewithanoverthescopeclipsysteminamulticenterexperienceananalysisofasuccessfulsuctionmethod
AT oryumakoto outcomesofgastrointestinaldefectclosurewithanoverthescopeclipsysteminamulticenterexperienceananalysisofasuccessfulsuctionmethod
AT aboellailmohamed outcomesofgastrointestinaldefectclosurewithanoverthescopeclipsysteminamulticenterexperienceananalysisofasuccessfulsuctionmethod
AT masakitsutomu outcomesofgastrointestinaldefectclosurewithanoverthescopeclipsysteminamulticenterexperienceananalysisofasuccessfulsuctionmethod