Cargando…
Fluid-Structure Interaction in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Effect of Modeling Techniques
In this work, the impact of modeling techniques on predicting the mechanical behaviors of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is systematically investigated. The fluid-structure interaction (FSI) model for simultaneously capturing the transient interaction between blood flow dynamics and wall mechanics...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5340988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28321413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/7023078 |
_version_ | 1782512912037838848 |
---|---|
author | Lin, Shengmao Han, Xinwei Bi, Yonghua Ju, Siyeong Gu, Linxia |
author_facet | Lin, Shengmao Han, Xinwei Bi, Yonghua Ju, Siyeong Gu, Linxia |
author_sort | Lin, Shengmao |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this work, the impact of modeling techniques on predicting the mechanical behaviors of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is systematically investigated. The fluid-structure interaction (FSI) model for simultaneously capturing the transient interaction between blood flow dynamics and wall mechanics was compared with its simplified techniques, that is, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) or computational solid stress (CSS) model. Results demonstrated that CFD exhibited relatively smaller vortexes and tends to overestimate the fluid wall shear stress, compared to FSI. On the contrary, the minimal differences in wall stresses and deformation were observed between FSI and CSS models. Furthermore, it was found that the accuracy of CSS prediction depends on the applied pressure profile for the aneurysm sac. A large pressure drop across AAA usually led to the underestimation of wall stresses and thus the AAA rupture. Moreover, the assumed isotropic AAA wall properties, compared to the anisotropic one, will aggravate the difference between the simplified models with the FSI approach. The present work demonstrated the importance of modeling techniques on predicting the blood flow dynamics and wall mechanics of the AAA, which could guide the selection of appropriate modeling technique for significant clinical implications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5340988 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53409882017-03-20 Fluid-Structure Interaction in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Effect of Modeling Techniques Lin, Shengmao Han, Xinwei Bi, Yonghua Ju, Siyeong Gu, Linxia Biomed Res Int Research Article In this work, the impact of modeling techniques on predicting the mechanical behaviors of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is systematically investigated. The fluid-structure interaction (FSI) model for simultaneously capturing the transient interaction between blood flow dynamics and wall mechanics was compared with its simplified techniques, that is, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) or computational solid stress (CSS) model. Results demonstrated that CFD exhibited relatively smaller vortexes and tends to overestimate the fluid wall shear stress, compared to FSI. On the contrary, the minimal differences in wall stresses and deformation were observed between FSI and CSS models. Furthermore, it was found that the accuracy of CSS prediction depends on the applied pressure profile for the aneurysm sac. A large pressure drop across AAA usually led to the underestimation of wall stresses and thus the AAA rupture. Moreover, the assumed isotropic AAA wall properties, compared to the anisotropic one, will aggravate the difference between the simplified models with the FSI approach. The present work demonstrated the importance of modeling techniques on predicting the blood flow dynamics and wall mechanics of the AAA, which could guide the selection of appropriate modeling technique for significant clinical implications. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2017 2017-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5340988/ /pubmed/28321413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/7023078 Text en Copyright © 2017 Shengmao Lin et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lin, Shengmao Han, Xinwei Bi, Yonghua Ju, Siyeong Gu, Linxia Fluid-Structure Interaction in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Effect of Modeling Techniques |
title | Fluid-Structure Interaction in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Effect of Modeling Techniques |
title_full | Fluid-Structure Interaction in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Effect of Modeling Techniques |
title_fullStr | Fluid-Structure Interaction in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Effect of Modeling Techniques |
title_full_unstemmed | Fluid-Structure Interaction in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Effect of Modeling Techniques |
title_short | Fluid-Structure Interaction in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Effect of Modeling Techniques |
title_sort | fluid-structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysm: effect of modeling techniques |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5340988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28321413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/7023078 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linshengmao fluidstructureinteractioninabdominalaorticaneurysmeffectofmodelingtechniques AT hanxinwei fluidstructureinteractioninabdominalaorticaneurysmeffectofmodelingtechniques AT biyonghua fluidstructureinteractioninabdominalaorticaneurysmeffectofmodelingtechniques AT jusiyeong fluidstructureinteractioninabdominalaorticaneurysmeffectofmodelingtechniques AT gulinxia fluidstructureinteractioninabdominalaorticaneurysmeffectofmodelingtechniques |