Cargando…

Fluid-Structure Interaction in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Effect of Modeling Techniques

In this work, the impact of modeling techniques on predicting the mechanical behaviors of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is systematically investigated. The fluid-structure interaction (FSI) model for simultaneously capturing the transient interaction between blood flow dynamics and wall mechanics...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Shengmao, Han, Xinwei, Bi, Yonghua, Ju, Siyeong, Gu, Linxia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5340988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28321413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/7023078
_version_ 1782512912037838848
author Lin, Shengmao
Han, Xinwei
Bi, Yonghua
Ju, Siyeong
Gu, Linxia
author_facet Lin, Shengmao
Han, Xinwei
Bi, Yonghua
Ju, Siyeong
Gu, Linxia
author_sort Lin, Shengmao
collection PubMed
description In this work, the impact of modeling techniques on predicting the mechanical behaviors of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is systematically investigated. The fluid-structure interaction (FSI) model for simultaneously capturing the transient interaction between blood flow dynamics and wall mechanics was compared with its simplified techniques, that is, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) or computational solid stress (CSS) model. Results demonstrated that CFD exhibited relatively smaller vortexes and tends to overestimate the fluid wall shear stress, compared to FSI. On the contrary, the minimal differences in wall stresses and deformation were observed between FSI and CSS models. Furthermore, it was found that the accuracy of CSS prediction depends on the applied pressure profile for the aneurysm sac. A large pressure drop across AAA usually led to the underestimation of wall stresses and thus the AAA rupture. Moreover, the assumed isotropic AAA wall properties, compared to the anisotropic one, will aggravate the difference between the simplified models with the FSI approach. The present work demonstrated the importance of modeling techniques on predicting the blood flow dynamics and wall mechanics of the AAA, which could guide the selection of appropriate modeling technique for significant clinical implications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5340988
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53409882017-03-20 Fluid-Structure Interaction in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Effect of Modeling Techniques Lin, Shengmao Han, Xinwei Bi, Yonghua Ju, Siyeong Gu, Linxia Biomed Res Int Research Article In this work, the impact of modeling techniques on predicting the mechanical behaviors of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is systematically investigated. The fluid-structure interaction (FSI) model for simultaneously capturing the transient interaction between blood flow dynamics and wall mechanics was compared with its simplified techniques, that is, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) or computational solid stress (CSS) model. Results demonstrated that CFD exhibited relatively smaller vortexes and tends to overestimate the fluid wall shear stress, compared to FSI. On the contrary, the minimal differences in wall stresses and deformation were observed between FSI and CSS models. Furthermore, it was found that the accuracy of CSS prediction depends on the applied pressure profile for the aneurysm sac. A large pressure drop across AAA usually led to the underestimation of wall stresses and thus the AAA rupture. Moreover, the assumed isotropic AAA wall properties, compared to the anisotropic one, will aggravate the difference between the simplified models with the FSI approach. The present work demonstrated the importance of modeling techniques on predicting the blood flow dynamics and wall mechanics of the AAA, which could guide the selection of appropriate modeling technique for significant clinical implications. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2017 2017-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5340988/ /pubmed/28321413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/7023078 Text en Copyright © 2017 Shengmao Lin et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lin, Shengmao
Han, Xinwei
Bi, Yonghua
Ju, Siyeong
Gu, Linxia
Fluid-Structure Interaction in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Effect of Modeling Techniques
title Fluid-Structure Interaction in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Effect of Modeling Techniques
title_full Fluid-Structure Interaction in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Effect of Modeling Techniques
title_fullStr Fluid-Structure Interaction in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Effect of Modeling Techniques
title_full_unstemmed Fluid-Structure Interaction in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Effect of Modeling Techniques
title_short Fluid-Structure Interaction in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Effect of Modeling Techniques
title_sort fluid-structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysm: effect of modeling techniques
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5340988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28321413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/7023078
work_keys_str_mv AT linshengmao fluidstructureinteractioninabdominalaorticaneurysmeffectofmodelingtechniques
AT hanxinwei fluidstructureinteractioninabdominalaorticaneurysmeffectofmodelingtechniques
AT biyonghua fluidstructureinteractioninabdominalaorticaneurysmeffectofmodelingtechniques
AT jusiyeong fluidstructureinteractioninabdominalaorticaneurysmeffectofmodelingtechniques
AT gulinxia fluidstructureinteractioninabdominalaorticaneurysmeffectofmodelingtechniques