Cargando…

An evaluation of inexpensive methods for root image acquisition when using rhizotrons

BACKGROUND: Belowground processes play an essential role in ecosystem nutrient cycling and the global carbon budget cycle. Quantifying fine root growth is crucial to the understanding of ecosystem structure and function and in predicting how ecosystems respond to climate variability. A better unders...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohamed, Awaz, Monnier, Yogan, Mao, Zhun, Lobet, Guillaume, Maeght, Jean-Luc, Ramel, Merlin, Stokes, Alexia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5341412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28286541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-017-0160-z
_version_ 1782512984823693312
author Mohamed, Awaz
Monnier, Yogan
Mao, Zhun
Lobet, Guillaume
Maeght, Jean-Luc
Ramel, Merlin
Stokes, Alexia
author_facet Mohamed, Awaz
Monnier, Yogan
Mao, Zhun
Lobet, Guillaume
Maeght, Jean-Luc
Ramel, Merlin
Stokes, Alexia
author_sort Mohamed, Awaz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Belowground processes play an essential role in ecosystem nutrient cycling and the global carbon budget cycle. Quantifying fine root growth is crucial to the understanding of ecosystem structure and function and in predicting how ecosystems respond to climate variability. A better understanding of root system growth is necessary, but choosing the best method of observation is complex, especially in the natural soil environment. Here, we compare five methods of root image acquisition using inexpensive technology that is currently available on the market: flatbed scanner, handheld scanner, manual tracing, a smartphone application scanner and a time-lapse camera. Using the five methods, root elongation rate (RER) was measured for three months, on roots of hybrid walnut (Juglans nigra × Juglans regia L.) in rhizotrons installed in agroforests. RESULTS: When all methods were compared together, there were no significant differences in relative cumulative root length. However, the time-lapse camera and the manual tracing method significantly overestimated the relative mean diameter of roots compared to the three scanning methods. The smartphone scanning application was found to perform best overall when considering image quality and ease of use in the field. The automatic time-lapse camera was useful for measuring RER over several months without any human intervention. CONCLUSION: Our results show that inexpensive scanning and automated methods provide correct measurements of root elongation and length (but not diameter when using the time-lapse camera). These methods are capable of detecting fine roots to a diameter of 0.1 mm and can therefore be selected by the user depending on the data required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5341412
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53414122017-03-10 An evaluation of inexpensive methods for root image acquisition when using rhizotrons Mohamed, Awaz Monnier, Yogan Mao, Zhun Lobet, Guillaume Maeght, Jean-Luc Ramel, Merlin Stokes, Alexia Plant Methods Methodology BACKGROUND: Belowground processes play an essential role in ecosystem nutrient cycling and the global carbon budget cycle. Quantifying fine root growth is crucial to the understanding of ecosystem structure and function and in predicting how ecosystems respond to climate variability. A better understanding of root system growth is necessary, but choosing the best method of observation is complex, especially in the natural soil environment. Here, we compare five methods of root image acquisition using inexpensive technology that is currently available on the market: flatbed scanner, handheld scanner, manual tracing, a smartphone application scanner and a time-lapse camera. Using the five methods, root elongation rate (RER) was measured for three months, on roots of hybrid walnut (Juglans nigra × Juglans regia L.) in rhizotrons installed in agroforests. RESULTS: When all methods were compared together, there were no significant differences in relative cumulative root length. However, the time-lapse camera and the manual tracing method significantly overestimated the relative mean diameter of roots compared to the three scanning methods. The smartphone scanning application was found to perform best overall when considering image quality and ease of use in the field. The automatic time-lapse camera was useful for measuring RER over several months without any human intervention. CONCLUSION: Our results show that inexpensive scanning and automated methods provide correct measurements of root elongation and length (but not diameter when using the time-lapse camera). These methods are capable of detecting fine roots to a diameter of 0.1 mm and can therefore be selected by the user depending on the data required. BioMed Central 2017-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5341412/ /pubmed/28286541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-017-0160-z Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology
Mohamed, Awaz
Monnier, Yogan
Mao, Zhun
Lobet, Guillaume
Maeght, Jean-Luc
Ramel, Merlin
Stokes, Alexia
An evaluation of inexpensive methods for root image acquisition when using rhizotrons
title An evaluation of inexpensive methods for root image acquisition when using rhizotrons
title_full An evaluation of inexpensive methods for root image acquisition when using rhizotrons
title_fullStr An evaluation of inexpensive methods for root image acquisition when using rhizotrons
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of inexpensive methods for root image acquisition when using rhizotrons
title_short An evaluation of inexpensive methods for root image acquisition when using rhizotrons
title_sort evaluation of inexpensive methods for root image acquisition when using rhizotrons
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5341412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28286541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-017-0160-z
work_keys_str_mv AT mohamedawaz anevaluationofinexpensivemethodsforrootimageacquisitionwhenusingrhizotrons
AT monnieryogan anevaluationofinexpensivemethodsforrootimageacquisitionwhenusingrhizotrons
AT maozhun anevaluationofinexpensivemethodsforrootimageacquisitionwhenusingrhizotrons
AT lobetguillaume anevaluationofinexpensivemethodsforrootimageacquisitionwhenusingrhizotrons
AT maeghtjeanluc anevaluationofinexpensivemethodsforrootimageacquisitionwhenusingrhizotrons
AT ramelmerlin anevaluationofinexpensivemethodsforrootimageacquisitionwhenusingrhizotrons
AT stokesalexia anevaluationofinexpensivemethodsforrootimageacquisitionwhenusingrhizotrons
AT mohamedawaz evaluationofinexpensivemethodsforrootimageacquisitionwhenusingrhizotrons
AT monnieryogan evaluationofinexpensivemethodsforrootimageacquisitionwhenusingrhizotrons
AT maozhun evaluationofinexpensivemethodsforrootimageacquisitionwhenusingrhizotrons
AT lobetguillaume evaluationofinexpensivemethodsforrootimageacquisitionwhenusingrhizotrons
AT maeghtjeanluc evaluationofinexpensivemethodsforrootimageacquisitionwhenusingrhizotrons
AT ramelmerlin evaluationofinexpensivemethodsforrootimageacquisitionwhenusingrhizotrons
AT stokesalexia evaluationofinexpensivemethodsforrootimageacquisitionwhenusingrhizotrons