Cargando…
An evaluation of inexpensive methods for root image acquisition when using rhizotrons
BACKGROUND: Belowground processes play an essential role in ecosystem nutrient cycling and the global carbon budget cycle. Quantifying fine root growth is crucial to the understanding of ecosystem structure and function and in predicting how ecosystems respond to climate variability. A better unders...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5341412/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28286541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-017-0160-z |
_version_ | 1782512984823693312 |
---|---|
author | Mohamed, Awaz Monnier, Yogan Mao, Zhun Lobet, Guillaume Maeght, Jean-Luc Ramel, Merlin Stokes, Alexia |
author_facet | Mohamed, Awaz Monnier, Yogan Mao, Zhun Lobet, Guillaume Maeght, Jean-Luc Ramel, Merlin Stokes, Alexia |
author_sort | Mohamed, Awaz |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Belowground processes play an essential role in ecosystem nutrient cycling and the global carbon budget cycle. Quantifying fine root growth is crucial to the understanding of ecosystem structure and function and in predicting how ecosystems respond to climate variability. A better understanding of root system growth is necessary, but choosing the best method of observation is complex, especially in the natural soil environment. Here, we compare five methods of root image acquisition using inexpensive technology that is currently available on the market: flatbed scanner, handheld scanner, manual tracing, a smartphone application scanner and a time-lapse camera. Using the five methods, root elongation rate (RER) was measured for three months, on roots of hybrid walnut (Juglans nigra × Juglans regia L.) in rhizotrons installed in agroforests. RESULTS: When all methods were compared together, there were no significant differences in relative cumulative root length. However, the time-lapse camera and the manual tracing method significantly overestimated the relative mean diameter of roots compared to the three scanning methods. The smartphone scanning application was found to perform best overall when considering image quality and ease of use in the field. The automatic time-lapse camera was useful for measuring RER over several months without any human intervention. CONCLUSION: Our results show that inexpensive scanning and automated methods provide correct measurements of root elongation and length (but not diameter when using the time-lapse camera). These methods are capable of detecting fine roots to a diameter of 0.1 mm and can therefore be selected by the user depending on the data required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5341412 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53414122017-03-10 An evaluation of inexpensive methods for root image acquisition when using rhizotrons Mohamed, Awaz Monnier, Yogan Mao, Zhun Lobet, Guillaume Maeght, Jean-Luc Ramel, Merlin Stokes, Alexia Plant Methods Methodology BACKGROUND: Belowground processes play an essential role in ecosystem nutrient cycling and the global carbon budget cycle. Quantifying fine root growth is crucial to the understanding of ecosystem structure and function and in predicting how ecosystems respond to climate variability. A better understanding of root system growth is necessary, but choosing the best method of observation is complex, especially in the natural soil environment. Here, we compare five methods of root image acquisition using inexpensive technology that is currently available on the market: flatbed scanner, handheld scanner, manual tracing, a smartphone application scanner and a time-lapse camera. Using the five methods, root elongation rate (RER) was measured for three months, on roots of hybrid walnut (Juglans nigra × Juglans regia L.) in rhizotrons installed in agroforests. RESULTS: When all methods were compared together, there were no significant differences in relative cumulative root length. However, the time-lapse camera and the manual tracing method significantly overestimated the relative mean diameter of roots compared to the three scanning methods. The smartphone scanning application was found to perform best overall when considering image quality and ease of use in the field. The automatic time-lapse camera was useful for measuring RER over several months without any human intervention. CONCLUSION: Our results show that inexpensive scanning and automated methods provide correct measurements of root elongation and length (but not diameter when using the time-lapse camera). These methods are capable of detecting fine roots to a diameter of 0.1 mm and can therefore be selected by the user depending on the data required. BioMed Central 2017-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5341412/ /pubmed/28286541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-017-0160-z Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Mohamed, Awaz Monnier, Yogan Mao, Zhun Lobet, Guillaume Maeght, Jean-Luc Ramel, Merlin Stokes, Alexia An evaluation of inexpensive methods for root image acquisition when using rhizotrons |
title | An evaluation of inexpensive methods for root image acquisition when using rhizotrons |
title_full | An evaluation of inexpensive methods for root image acquisition when using rhizotrons |
title_fullStr | An evaluation of inexpensive methods for root image acquisition when using rhizotrons |
title_full_unstemmed | An evaluation of inexpensive methods for root image acquisition when using rhizotrons |
title_short | An evaluation of inexpensive methods for root image acquisition when using rhizotrons |
title_sort | evaluation of inexpensive methods for root image acquisition when using rhizotrons |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5341412/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28286541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-017-0160-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mohamedawaz anevaluationofinexpensivemethodsforrootimageacquisitionwhenusingrhizotrons AT monnieryogan anevaluationofinexpensivemethodsforrootimageacquisitionwhenusingrhizotrons AT maozhun anevaluationofinexpensivemethodsforrootimageacquisitionwhenusingrhizotrons AT lobetguillaume anevaluationofinexpensivemethodsforrootimageacquisitionwhenusingrhizotrons AT maeghtjeanluc anevaluationofinexpensivemethodsforrootimageacquisitionwhenusingrhizotrons AT ramelmerlin anevaluationofinexpensivemethodsforrootimageacquisitionwhenusingrhizotrons AT stokesalexia anevaluationofinexpensivemethodsforrootimageacquisitionwhenusingrhizotrons AT mohamedawaz evaluationofinexpensivemethodsforrootimageacquisitionwhenusingrhizotrons AT monnieryogan evaluationofinexpensivemethodsforrootimageacquisitionwhenusingrhizotrons AT maozhun evaluationofinexpensivemethodsforrootimageacquisitionwhenusingrhizotrons AT lobetguillaume evaluationofinexpensivemethodsforrootimageacquisitionwhenusingrhizotrons AT maeghtjeanluc evaluationofinexpensivemethodsforrootimageacquisitionwhenusingrhizotrons AT ramelmerlin evaluationofinexpensivemethodsforrootimageacquisitionwhenusingrhizotrons AT stokesalexia evaluationofinexpensivemethodsforrootimageacquisitionwhenusingrhizotrons |