Cargando…

Comparison of two European paediatric emergency departments: does primary care organisation influence emergency attendance?

BACKROUND: To compare paediatric Emergency Department (ED) attendances and admission outcomes in two European hospitals with different paediatric primary care set-up. METHODS: This is a retrospective prevalence study comparing all paediatric ED attendances during calendar years 2013 in two EDs with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poropat, F., Heinz, P., Barbi, E., Ventura, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5341451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28274237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13052-017-0339-y
_version_ 1782512993341276160
author Poropat, F.
Heinz, P.
Barbi, E.
Ventura, A.
author_facet Poropat, F.
Heinz, P.
Barbi, E.
Ventura, A.
author_sort Poropat, F.
collection PubMed
description BACKROUND: To compare paediatric Emergency Department (ED) attendances and admission outcomes in two European hospitals with different paediatric primary care set-up. METHODS: This is a retrospective prevalence study comparing all paediatric ED attendances during calendar years 2013 in two EDs with similar catchment area: one in Italy (Trieste) where paediatric primary care is provided by office paediatricians, the other, in the UK (Cambridge), where paediatric primary care is provided by general practitioners. Data on reason for presentation, discharge diagnosis and admission rate were collected and sub-group analysis for specific age groups (<1 year, 1–4 years, 5–15 years) was performed. RESULTS: Over 12 months, 20.331 children (0–15 years old) were seen in Cambridge and 18.646 in Trieste, with a very similar age distribution in both centres, except for the youngest age group: the percentage of infants seen in comparison with the total number of children attending ED was 1/3 higher in England than in Italy (15.4% vs 11.4%). The reasons for attendance were similar: under 1 year of age, the chief complaints were fever, breathing difficulties and gastrointestinal problems while in the older age groups trauma represented the commonest reason. Among discharge diagnoses, no differences were found between the two hospitals, except for faltering growth and “well child”, more frequently diagnosed in English children under 5 years. The proportion of admissions was three times higher in Cambridge (14.1% vs 4.8%) with most children being admitted for infectious diseases. CONCLUSIONS: ED attendances in infants are more common in a primary care setting provided by general practicioner and, moreover, admission rates in all age groups are 1/3 reduced by primary care based paediatricians. Due to the methodological limits of this study, it isn't possible to evaluate whether these results depend only on paediatric primary care set-up or be determined by other confounding factors. New studies are needed to confirm this preliminary evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5341451
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53414512017-03-10 Comparison of two European paediatric emergency departments: does primary care organisation influence emergency attendance? Poropat, F. Heinz, P. Barbi, E. Ventura, A. Ital J Pediatr Research BACKROUND: To compare paediatric Emergency Department (ED) attendances and admission outcomes in two European hospitals with different paediatric primary care set-up. METHODS: This is a retrospective prevalence study comparing all paediatric ED attendances during calendar years 2013 in two EDs with similar catchment area: one in Italy (Trieste) where paediatric primary care is provided by office paediatricians, the other, in the UK (Cambridge), where paediatric primary care is provided by general practitioners. Data on reason for presentation, discharge diagnosis and admission rate were collected and sub-group analysis for specific age groups (<1 year, 1–4 years, 5–15 years) was performed. RESULTS: Over 12 months, 20.331 children (0–15 years old) were seen in Cambridge and 18.646 in Trieste, with a very similar age distribution in both centres, except for the youngest age group: the percentage of infants seen in comparison with the total number of children attending ED was 1/3 higher in England than in Italy (15.4% vs 11.4%). The reasons for attendance were similar: under 1 year of age, the chief complaints were fever, breathing difficulties and gastrointestinal problems while in the older age groups trauma represented the commonest reason. Among discharge diagnoses, no differences were found between the two hospitals, except for faltering growth and “well child”, more frequently diagnosed in English children under 5 years. The proportion of admissions was three times higher in Cambridge (14.1% vs 4.8%) with most children being admitted for infectious diseases. CONCLUSIONS: ED attendances in infants are more common in a primary care setting provided by general practicioner and, moreover, admission rates in all age groups are 1/3 reduced by primary care based paediatricians. Due to the methodological limits of this study, it isn't possible to evaluate whether these results depend only on paediatric primary care set-up or be determined by other confounding factors. New studies are needed to confirm this preliminary evidence. BioMed Central 2017-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5341451/ /pubmed/28274237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13052-017-0339-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Poropat, F.
Heinz, P.
Barbi, E.
Ventura, A.
Comparison of two European paediatric emergency departments: does primary care organisation influence emergency attendance?
title Comparison of two European paediatric emergency departments: does primary care organisation influence emergency attendance?
title_full Comparison of two European paediatric emergency departments: does primary care organisation influence emergency attendance?
title_fullStr Comparison of two European paediatric emergency departments: does primary care organisation influence emergency attendance?
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two European paediatric emergency departments: does primary care organisation influence emergency attendance?
title_short Comparison of two European paediatric emergency departments: does primary care organisation influence emergency attendance?
title_sort comparison of two european paediatric emergency departments: does primary care organisation influence emergency attendance?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5341451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28274237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13052-017-0339-y
work_keys_str_mv AT poropatf comparisonoftwoeuropeanpaediatricemergencydepartmentsdoesprimarycareorganisationinfluenceemergencyattendance
AT heinzp comparisonoftwoeuropeanpaediatricemergencydepartmentsdoesprimarycareorganisationinfluenceemergencyattendance
AT barbie comparisonoftwoeuropeanpaediatricemergencydepartmentsdoesprimarycareorganisationinfluenceemergencyattendance
AT venturaa comparisonoftwoeuropeanpaediatricemergencydepartmentsdoesprimarycareorganisationinfluenceemergencyattendance