Cargando…
The Effect of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Compared to Propofol on Patients Hemodynamics as a Sedative in Brachial Plexus Block: A Comparative Study
BACKGROUND: The quest for an ideal sedative during regional anesthesia is on. Although propofol has been accepted as a sedative intraoperatively, it can be associated with troublesome hemodynamic changes. Dexmedetomidine is a new alpha 2 agonist used widely for sedation. AIMS: In this study, we trie...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5341667/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28298785 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.200236 |
_version_ | 1782513020991176704 |
---|---|
author | Kumar, Amarjeet Sinha, Chandni Kumar, Ajeet Kumari, Poonam |
author_facet | Kumar, Amarjeet Sinha, Chandni Kumar, Ajeet Kumari, Poonam |
author_sort | Kumar, Amarjeet |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The quest for an ideal sedative during regional anesthesia is on. Although propofol has been accepted as a sedative intraoperatively, it can be associated with troublesome hemodynamic changes. Dexmedetomidine is a new alpha 2 agonist used widely for sedation. AIMS: In this study, we tried to compare equivalent doses of dexmedetomidine infusion with propofol with emphasis on their effect on the hemodynamics. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Prospective, single-blinded randomized controlled trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a single blinded study, 60 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I and II patients scheduled for forearm surgeries under brachial plexus block were randomized to receive either propofol (Group I) or dexmedetomidine (Group II) infusion. Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block was given in all the patients. After confirming adequate motor and sensory blockade, they were administered an initial loading dose of the drug over 10 min followed by a maintenance dose till the end of the surgery. The rate of infusion was titrated to maintain Ramsay sedation score of 2–4. Intraoperative hemodynamic and respiratory effects were documented along with surgeon and patient satisfaction. Any adverse effect such as hypotension, bradycardia, nausea, and vomiting was also noted. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The data collected were evaluated using Stata version 10. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Heart rate decreased significantly in Group II (dexmedetomidine) while mean arterial pressure decreased significantly in Group I (propofol). There was no increase in the incidence of bradycardia or hypotension in either groups. Patient satisfaction score was significantly greater in Group II (dexmedetomidine) while surgeon satisfaction score was similar in both the groups. CONCLUSION: Dexmedetomidine at equivalent doses of propofol has a similar hemodynamic and respiratory effect, similar surgeon's satisfaction score, higher patient's satisfaction score, and no significant side effects in ASA I/II patients. Thus, dexmedetomidine may prove to be a valuable alternative to propofol for sedation in patients undergoing upper limb surgeries in brachial plexus block. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5341667 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53416672017-03-15 The Effect of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Compared to Propofol on Patients Hemodynamics as a Sedative in Brachial Plexus Block: A Comparative Study Kumar, Amarjeet Sinha, Chandni Kumar, Ajeet Kumari, Poonam Anesth Essays Res Original Article BACKGROUND: The quest for an ideal sedative during regional anesthesia is on. Although propofol has been accepted as a sedative intraoperatively, it can be associated with troublesome hemodynamic changes. Dexmedetomidine is a new alpha 2 agonist used widely for sedation. AIMS: In this study, we tried to compare equivalent doses of dexmedetomidine infusion with propofol with emphasis on their effect on the hemodynamics. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Prospective, single-blinded randomized controlled trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a single blinded study, 60 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I and II patients scheduled for forearm surgeries under brachial plexus block were randomized to receive either propofol (Group I) or dexmedetomidine (Group II) infusion. Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block was given in all the patients. After confirming adequate motor and sensory blockade, they were administered an initial loading dose of the drug over 10 min followed by a maintenance dose till the end of the surgery. The rate of infusion was titrated to maintain Ramsay sedation score of 2–4. Intraoperative hemodynamic and respiratory effects were documented along with surgeon and patient satisfaction. Any adverse effect such as hypotension, bradycardia, nausea, and vomiting was also noted. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The data collected were evaluated using Stata version 10. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Heart rate decreased significantly in Group II (dexmedetomidine) while mean arterial pressure decreased significantly in Group I (propofol). There was no increase in the incidence of bradycardia or hypotension in either groups. Patient satisfaction score was significantly greater in Group II (dexmedetomidine) while surgeon satisfaction score was similar in both the groups. CONCLUSION: Dexmedetomidine at equivalent doses of propofol has a similar hemodynamic and respiratory effect, similar surgeon's satisfaction score, higher patient's satisfaction score, and no significant side effects in ASA I/II patients. Thus, dexmedetomidine may prove to be a valuable alternative to propofol for sedation in patients undergoing upper limb surgeries in brachial plexus block. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5341667/ /pubmed/28298785 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.200236 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Anesthesia: Essays and Researches http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kumar, Amarjeet Sinha, Chandni Kumar, Ajeet Kumari, Poonam The Effect of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Compared to Propofol on Patients Hemodynamics as a Sedative in Brachial Plexus Block: A Comparative Study |
title | The Effect of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Compared to Propofol on Patients Hemodynamics as a Sedative in Brachial Plexus Block: A Comparative Study |
title_full | The Effect of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Compared to Propofol on Patients Hemodynamics as a Sedative in Brachial Plexus Block: A Comparative Study |
title_fullStr | The Effect of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Compared to Propofol on Patients Hemodynamics as a Sedative in Brachial Plexus Block: A Comparative Study |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effect of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Compared to Propofol on Patients Hemodynamics as a Sedative in Brachial Plexus Block: A Comparative Study |
title_short | The Effect of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Compared to Propofol on Patients Hemodynamics as a Sedative in Brachial Plexus Block: A Comparative Study |
title_sort | effect of intravenous dexmedetomidine compared to propofol on patients hemodynamics as a sedative in brachial plexus block: a comparative study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5341667/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28298785 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.200236 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kumaramarjeet theeffectofintravenousdexmedetomidinecomparedtopropofolonpatientshemodynamicsasasedativeinbrachialplexusblockacomparativestudy AT sinhachandni theeffectofintravenousdexmedetomidinecomparedtopropofolonpatientshemodynamicsasasedativeinbrachialplexusblockacomparativestudy AT kumarajeet theeffectofintravenousdexmedetomidinecomparedtopropofolonpatientshemodynamicsasasedativeinbrachialplexusblockacomparativestudy AT kumaripoonam theeffectofintravenousdexmedetomidinecomparedtopropofolonpatientshemodynamicsasasedativeinbrachialplexusblockacomparativestudy AT kumaramarjeet effectofintravenousdexmedetomidinecomparedtopropofolonpatientshemodynamicsasasedativeinbrachialplexusblockacomparativestudy AT sinhachandni effectofintravenousdexmedetomidinecomparedtopropofolonpatientshemodynamicsasasedativeinbrachialplexusblockacomparativestudy AT kumarajeet effectofintravenousdexmedetomidinecomparedtopropofolonpatientshemodynamicsasasedativeinbrachialplexusblockacomparativestudy AT kumaripoonam effectofintravenousdexmedetomidinecomparedtopropofolonpatientshemodynamicsasasedativeinbrachialplexusblockacomparativestudy |