Cargando…

Effects of Inhaled Nitrous Oxide on the Induction Dose and Time Requirements of Propofol: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study

CONTEXT: Propofol is a commonly used induction agent during general anesthesia. As a sole agent, it does not provide any strong analgesic effect. The nitrous oxide (N(2)O) used along with propofol for induction of anesthesia augments the induction characteristics and reduces the dose of propofol. AI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jain, Kavita, Sethi, Surendra Kumar, Damor, Mamta, Jain, Neena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5341682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28298780
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.183165
_version_ 1782513024443088896
author Jain, Kavita
Sethi, Surendra Kumar
Damor, Mamta
Jain, Neena
author_facet Jain, Kavita
Sethi, Surendra Kumar
Damor, Mamta
Jain, Neena
author_sort Jain, Kavita
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Propofol is a commonly used induction agent during general anesthesia. As a sole agent, it does not provide any strong analgesic effect. The nitrous oxide (N(2)O) used along with propofol for induction of anesthesia augments the induction characteristics and reduces the dose of propofol. AIMS: To study the effects of inhaled N(2)O on the induction dose and time of propofol during general anesthesia and also its hemodynamic response and adverse effects. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: The present research is a prospective, randomized, double-blind comparative study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The study population consisted of eighty patients aged 18–60 years from either sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 and 2 which were scheduled for various elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia. The patients were randomly allocated into two groups comprising forty patients in each group. All patients were premedicated with glycopyrrolate 0.2 mg, ondansetron 4 mg, and fentanyl 1 μg/kg intravenously. Group FN received breathing mixture of gases (67% N(2)O @ 4 L/min and 33% O(2) @ 2 L/min), and propofol and Group FO received 100% O(2) @ 6 L/min and propofol. The different hemodynamic parameters (heart rate, mean arterial pressure, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and SpO(2)) were measured. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: All observations were analyzed using Chi-square test, Student's t-test, and analysis of variance. RESULTS: The mean induction time and dose were significantly less in Group FN as compared to Group FO (P < 0.05). The mean induction time was 172 ± 32 s in Group FN as compared to 242 ± 43 s in Group FO (P < 001), whereas the mean induction dose was 56.10 ± 13.92 mg in Group FN as compared to 81.67 ± 17.64 mg in Group FO (P < 0.05). The hemodynamic parameters remained stable with no complications. CONCLUSION: The coadministration of N(2)O during induction of anesthesia with propofol not only reduced the induction dose of propofol but also reduced induction time significantly. Furthermore, it provided stable hemodynamics without any complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5341682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53416822017-03-15 Effects of Inhaled Nitrous Oxide on the Induction Dose and Time Requirements of Propofol: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study Jain, Kavita Sethi, Surendra Kumar Damor, Mamta Jain, Neena Anesth Essays Res Original Article CONTEXT: Propofol is a commonly used induction agent during general anesthesia. As a sole agent, it does not provide any strong analgesic effect. The nitrous oxide (N(2)O) used along with propofol for induction of anesthesia augments the induction characteristics and reduces the dose of propofol. AIMS: To study the effects of inhaled N(2)O on the induction dose and time of propofol during general anesthesia and also its hemodynamic response and adverse effects. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: The present research is a prospective, randomized, double-blind comparative study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The study population consisted of eighty patients aged 18–60 years from either sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 and 2 which were scheduled for various elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia. The patients were randomly allocated into two groups comprising forty patients in each group. All patients were premedicated with glycopyrrolate 0.2 mg, ondansetron 4 mg, and fentanyl 1 μg/kg intravenously. Group FN received breathing mixture of gases (67% N(2)O @ 4 L/min and 33% O(2) @ 2 L/min), and propofol and Group FO received 100% O(2) @ 6 L/min and propofol. The different hemodynamic parameters (heart rate, mean arterial pressure, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and SpO(2)) were measured. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: All observations were analyzed using Chi-square test, Student's t-test, and analysis of variance. RESULTS: The mean induction time and dose were significantly less in Group FN as compared to Group FO (P < 0.05). The mean induction time was 172 ± 32 s in Group FN as compared to 242 ± 43 s in Group FO (P < 001), whereas the mean induction dose was 56.10 ± 13.92 mg in Group FN as compared to 81.67 ± 17.64 mg in Group FO (P < 0.05). The hemodynamic parameters remained stable with no complications. CONCLUSION: The coadministration of N(2)O during induction of anesthesia with propofol not only reduced the induction dose of propofol but also reduced induction time significantly. Furthermore, it provided stable hemodynamics without any complications. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5341682/ /pubmed/28298780 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.183165 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Anesthesia: Essays and Researches http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jain, Kavita
Sethi, Surendra Kumar
Damor, Mamta
Jain, Neena
Effects of Inhaled Nitrous Oxide on the Induction Dose and Time Requirements of Propofol: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study
title Effects of Inhaled Nitrous Oxide on the Induction Dose and Time Requirements of Propofol: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study
title_full Effects of Inhaled Nitrous Oxide on the Induction Dose and Time Requirements of Propofol: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study
title_fullStr Effects of Inhaled Nitrous Oxide on the Induction Dose and Time Requirements of Propofol: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Inhaled Nitrous Oxide on the Induction Dose and Time Requirements of Propofol: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study
title_short Effects of Inhaled Nitrous Oxide on the Induction Dose and Time Requirements of Propofol: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study
title_sort effects of inhaled nitrous oxide on the induction dose and time requirements of propofol: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5341682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28298780
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.183165
work_keys_str_mv AT jainkavita effectsofinhalednitrousoxideontheinductiondoseandtimerequirementsofpropofolaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudy
AT sethisurendrakumar effectsofinhalednitrousoxideontheinductiondoseandtimerequirementsofpropofolaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudy
AT damormamta effectsofinhalednitrousoxideontheinductiondoseandtimerequirementsofpropofolaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudy
AT jainneena effectsofinhalednitrousoxideontheinductiondoseandtimerequirementsofpropofolaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindstudy