Cargando…
Classical and adaptive control of ex vivo skeletal muscle contractions using Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES)
Functional Electrical Stimulation is a promising approach to treat patients by stimulating the peripheral nerves and their corresponding motor neurons using electrical current. This technique helps maintain muscle mass and promote blood flow in the absence of a functioning nervous system. The goal o...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5342220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28273101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172761 |
_version_ | 1782513131397840896 |
---|---|
author | Jaramillo Cienfuegos, Paola Shoemaker, Adam Grange, Robert W. Abaid, Nicole Leonessa, Alexander |
author_facet | Jaramillo Cienfuegos, Paola Shoemaker, Adam Grange, Robert W. Abaid, Nicole Leonessa, Alexander |
author_sort | Jaramillo Cienfuegos, Paola |
collection | PubMed |
description | Functional Electrical Stimulation is a promising approach to treat patients by stimulating the peripheral nerves and their corresponding motor neurons using electrical current. This technique helps maintain muscle mass and promote blood flow in the absence of a functioning nervous system. The goal of this work is to control muscle contractions from FES via three different algorithms and assess the most appropriate controller providing effective stimulation of the muscle. An open-loop system and a closed-loop system with three types of model-free feedback controllers were assessed for tracking control of skeletal muscle contractions: a Proportional-Integral (PI) controller, a Model Reference Adaptive Control algorithm, and an Adaptive Augmented PI system. Furthermore, a mathematical model of a muscle-mass-spring system was implemented in simulation to test the open-loop case and closed-loop controllers. These simulations were carried out and then validated through experiments ex vivo. The experiments included muscle contractions following four distinct trajectories: a step, sine, ramp, and square wave. Overall, the closed-loop controllers followed the stimulation trajectories set for all the simulated and tested muscles. When comparing the experimental outcomes of each controller, we concluded that the Adaptive Augmented PI algorithm provided the best closed-loop performance for speed of convergence and disturbance rejection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5342220 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53422202017-03-29 Classical and adaptive control of ex vivo skeletal muscle contractions using Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) Jaramillo Cienfuegos, Paola Shoemaker, Adam Grange, Robert W. Abaid, Nicole Leonessa, Alexander PLoS One Research Article Functional Electrical Stimulation is a promising approach to treat patients by stimulating the peripheral nerves and their corresponding motor neurons using electrical current. This technique helps maintain muscle mass and promote blood flow in the absence of a functioning nervous system. The goal of this work is to control muscle contractions from FES via three different algorithms and assess the most appropriate controller providing effective stimulation of the muscle. An open-loop system and a closed-loop system with three types of model-free feedback controllers were assessed for tracking control of skeletal muscle contractions: a Proportional-Integral (PI) controller, a Model Reference Adaptive Control algorithm, and an Adaptive Augmented PI system. Furthermore, a mathematical model of a muscle-mass-spring system was implemented in simulation to test the open-loop case and closed-loop controllers. These simulations were carried out and then validated through experiments ex vivo. The experiments included muscle contractions following four distinct trajectories: a step, sine, ramp, and square wave. Overall, the closed-loop controllers followed the stimulation trajectories set for all the simulated and tested muscles. When comparing the experimental outcomes of each controller, we concluded that the Adaptive Augmented PI algorithm provided the best closed-loop performance for speed of convergence and disturbance rejection. Public Library of Science 2017-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5342220/ /pubmed/28273101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172761 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jaramillo Cienfuegos, Paola Shoemaker, Adam Grange, Robert W. Abaid, Nicole Leonessa, Alexander Classical and adaptive control of ex vivo skeletal muscle contractions using Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) |
title | Classical and adaptive control of ex vivo skeletal muscle contractions using Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) |
title_full | Classical and adaptive control of ex vivo skeletal muscle contractions using Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) |
title_fullStr | Classical and adaptive control of ex vivo skeletal muscle contractions using Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) |
title_full_unstemmed | Classical and adaptive control of ex vivo skeletal muscle contractions using Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) |
title_short | Classical and adaptive control of ex vivo skeletal muscle contractions using Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) |
title_sort | classical and adaptive control of ex vivo skeletal muscle contractions using functional electrical stimulation (fes) |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5342220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28273101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172761 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jaramillocienfuegospaola classicalandadaptivecontrolofexvivoskeletalmusclecontractionsusingfunctionalelectricalstimulationfes AT shoemakeradam classicalandadaptivecontrolofexvivoskeletalmusclecontractionsusingfunctionalelectricalstimulationfes AT grangerobertw classicalandadaptivecontrolofexvivoskeletalmusclecontractionsusingfunctionalelectricalstimulationfes AT abaidnicole classicalandadaptivecontrolofexvivoskeletalmusclecontractionsusingfunctionalelectricalstimulationfes AT leonessaalexander classicalandadaptivecontrolofexvivoskeletalmusclecontractionsusingfunctionalelectricalstimulationfes |