Cargando…

Classical and adaptive control of ex vivo skeletal muscle contractions using Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES)

Functional Electrical Stimulation is a promising approach to treat patients by stimulating the peripheral nerves and their corresponding motor neurons using electrical current. This technique helps maintain muscle mass and promote blood flow in the absence of a functioning nervous system. The goal o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jaramillo Cienfuegos, Paola, Shoemaker, Adam, Grange, Robert W., Abaid, Nicole, Leonessa, Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5342220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28273101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172761
_version_ 1782513131397840896
author Jaramillo Cienfuegos, Paola
Shoemaker, Adam
Grange, Robert W.
Abaid, Nicole
Leonessa, Alexander
author_facet Jaramillo Cienfuegos, Paola
Shoemaker, Adam
Grange, Robert W.
Abaid, Nicole
Leonessa, Alexander
author_sort Jaramillo Cienfuegos, Paola
collection PubMed
description Functional Electrical Stimulation is a promising approach to treat patients by stimulating the peripheral nerves and their corresponding motor neurons using electrical current. This technique helps maintain muscle mass and promote blood flow in the absence of a functioning nervous system. The goal of this work is to control muscle contractions from FES via three different algorithms and assess the most appropriate controller providing effective stimulation of the muscle. An open-loop system and a closed-loop system with three types of model-free feedback controllers were assessed for tracking control of skeletal muscle contractions: a Proportional-Integral (PI) controller, a Model Reference Adaptive Control algorithm, and an Adaptive Augmented PI system. Furthermore, a mathematical model of a muscle-mass-spring system was implemented in simulation to test the open-loop case and closed-loop controllers. These simulations were carried out and then validated through experiments ex vivo. The experiments included muscle contractions following four distinct trajectories: a step, sine, ramp, and square wave. Overall, the closed-loop controllers followed the stimulation trajectories set for all the simulated and tested muscles. When comparing the experimental outcomes of each controller, we concluded that the Adaptive Augmented PI algorithm provided the best closed-loop performance for speed of convergence and disturbance rejection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5342220
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53422202017-03-29 Classical and adaptive control of ex vivo skeletal muscle contractions using Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) Jaramillo Cienfuegos, Paola Shoemaker, Adam Grange, Robert W. Abaid, Nicole Leonessa, Alexander PLoS One Research Article Functional Electrical Stimulation is a promising approach to treat patients by stimulating the peripheral nerves and their corresponding motor neurons using electrical current. This technique helps maintain muscle mass and promote blood flow in the absence of a functioning nervous system. The goal of this work is to control muscle contractions from FES via three different algorithms and assess the most appropriate controller providing effective stimulation of the muscle. An open-loop system and a closed-loop system with three types of model-free feedback controllers were assessed for tracking control of skeletal muscle contractions: a Proportional-Integral (PI) controller, a Model Reference Adaptive Control algorithm, and an Adaptive Augmented PI system. Furthermore, a mathematical model of a muscle-mass-spring system was implemented in simulation to test the open-loop case and closed-loop controllers. These simulations were carried out and then validated through experiments ex vivo. The experiments included muscle contractions following four distinct trajectories: a step, sine, ramp, and square wave. Overall, the closed-loop controllers followed the stimulation trajectories set for all the simulated and tested muscles. When comparing the experimental outcomes of each controller, we concluded that the Adaptive Augmented PI algorithm provided the best closed-loop performance for speed of convergence and disturbance rejection. Public Library of Science 2017-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5342220/ /pubmed/28273101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172761 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jaramillo Cienfuegos, Paola
Shoemaker, Adam
Grange, Robert W.
Abaid, Nicole
Leonessa, Alexander
Classical and adaptive control of ex vivo skeletal muscle contractions using Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES)
title Classical and adaptive control of ex vivo skeletal muscle contractions using Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES)
title_full Classical and adaptive control of ex vivo skeletal muscle contractions using Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES)
title_fullStr Classical and adaptive control of ex vivo skeletal muscle contractions using Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES)
title_full_unstemmed Classical and adaptive control of ex vivo skeletal muscle contractions using Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES)
title_short Classical and adaptive control of ex vivo skeletal muscle contractions using Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES)
title_sort classical and adaptive control of ex vivo skeletal muscle contractions using functional electrical stimulation (fes)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5342220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28273101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172761
work_keys_str_mv AT jaramillocienfuegospaola classicalandadaptivecontrolofexvivoskeletalmusclecontractionsusingfunctionalelectricalstimulationfes
AT shoemakeradam classicalandadaptivecontrolofexvivoskeletalmusclecontractionsusingfunctionalelectricalstimulationfes
AT grangerobertw classicalandadaptivecontrolofexvivoskeletalmusclecontractionsusingfunctionalelectricalstimulationfes
AT abaidnicole classicalandadaptivecontrolofexvivoskeletalmusclecontractionsusingfunctionalelectricalstimulationfes
AT leonessaalexander classicalandadaptivecontrolofexvivoskeletalmusclecontractionsusingfunctionalelectricalstimulationfes