Cargando…
Digoxin Plus Trametinib Therapy Achieves Disease Control in BRAF Wild-Type Metastatic Melanoma Patients
This is the first prospective study of a combination therapy involving a cardenolide and a MEK inhibitor for metastatic melanoma. Whereas BRAF mutant melanomas can exhibit profound responses to treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitors, there are fewer options for BRAF wild-type melanomas. In preclinic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Neoplasia Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5342980/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28278423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neo.2017.01.010 |
_version_ | 1782513279218745344 |
---|---|
author | Frankel, Arthur E. Eskiocak, Ugur Gill, Jennifer G. Yuan, Stacy Ramesh, Vijayashree Froehlich, Thomas W. Ahn, Chul Morrison, Sean J. |
author_facet | Frankel, Arthur E. Eskiocak, Ugur Gill, Jennifer G. Yuan, Stacy Ramesh, Vijayashree Froehlich, Thomas W. Ahn, Chul Morrison, Sean J. |
author_sort | Frankel, Arthur E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This is the first prospective study of a combination therapy involving a cardenolide and a MEK inhibitor for metastatic melanoma. Whereas BRAF mutant melanomas can exhibit profound responses to treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitors, there are fewer options for BRAF wild-type melanomas. In preclinical studies, we discovered that cardenolides synergize with MEK inhibitor to promote the regression of patient-derived xenografts irrespective of BRAF mutation status. We therefore conducted a phase 1B study of digoxin 0.25 mg and trametinib 2 mg given orally once daily in 20 patients with advanced, refractory, BRAF wild-type melanomas. The most common adverse events were rash, diarrhea, nausea, and fatigue. The response rate was 4/20 or 20% with response durations of 2, 4, 6, and 8 months. The disease control rate (including partial responses and stable disease) was 13/20 or 65% of patients, including 5/6 or 83% of patients with NRAS mutant melanomas and 8/14 or 57% of NRAS wild-type melanomas. Patients with stable disease had disease control for 2, 2, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, and 10 months. Xenografts from four patients recapitulated the treatment responses observed in patients. Based on these pilot results, an expansion arm of digoxin plus MEK inhibitor is warranted for NRAS mutant metastatic melanoma patients who are refractory or intolerant of immunotherapy. KEY POINTS: Digoxin plus trametinib is well tolerated and achieves a high rate of disease control in BRAF wild-type metastatic melanoma patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5342980 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Neoplasia Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53429802017-03-17 Digoxin Plus Trametinib Therapy Achieves Disease Control in BRAF Wild-Type Metastatic Melanoma Patients Frankel, Arthur E. Eskiocak, Ugur Gill, Jennifer G. Yuan, Stacy Ramesh, Vijayashree Froehlich, Thomas W. Ahn, Chul Morrison, Sean J. Neoplasia Original article This is the first prospective study of a combination therapy involving a cardenolide and a MEK inhibitor for metastatic melanoma. Whereas BRAF mutant melanomas can exhibit profound responses to treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitors, there are fewer options for BRAF wild-type melanomas. In preclinical studies, we discovered that cardenolides synergize with MEK inhibitor to promote the regression of patient-derived xenografts irrespective of BRAF mutation status. We therefore conducted a phase 1B study of digoxin 0.25 mg and trametinib 2 mg given orally once daily in 20 patients with advanced, refractory, BRAF wild-type melanomas. The most common adverse events were rash, diarrhea, nausea, and fatigue. The response rate was 4/20 or 20% with response durations of 2, 4, 6, and 8 months. The disease control rate (including partial responses and stable disease) was 13/20 or 65% of patients, including 5/6 or 83% of patients with NRAS mutant melanomas and 8/14 or 57% of NRAS wild-type melanomas. Patients with stable disease had disease control for 2, 2, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, and 10 months. Xenografts from four patients recapitulated the treatment responses observed in patients. Based on these pilot results, an expansion arm of digoxin plus MEK inhibitor is warranted for NRAS mutant metastatic melanoma patients who are refractory or intolerant of immunotherapy. KEY POINTS: Digoxin plus trametinib is well tolerated and achieves a high rate of disease control in BRAF wild-type metastatic melanoma patients. Neoplasia Press 2017-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5342980/ /pubmed/28278423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neo.2017.01.010 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original article Frankel, Arthur E. Eskiocak, Ugur Gill, Jennifer G. Yuan, Stacy Ramesh, Vijayashree Froehlich, Thomas W. Ahn, Chul Morrison, Sean J. Digoxin Plus Trametinib Therapy Achieves Disease Control in BRAF Wild-Type Metastatic Melanoma Patients |
title | Digoxin Plus Trametinib Therapy Achieves Disease Control in BRAF Wild-Type Metastatic Melanoma Patients |
title_full | Digoxin Plus Trametinib Therapy Achieves Disease Control in BRAF Wild-Type Metastatic Melanoma Patients |
title_fullStr | Digoxin Plus Trametinib Therapy Achieves Disease Control in BRAF Wild-Type Metastatic Melanoma Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Digoxin Plus Trametinib Therapy Achieves Disease Control in BRAF Wild-Type Metastatic Melanoma Patients |
title_short | Digoxin Plus Trametinib Therapy Achieves Disease Control in BRAF Wild-Type Metastatic Melanoma Patients |
title_sort | digoxin plus trametinib therapy achieves disease control in braf wild-type metastatic melanoma patients |
topic | Original article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5342980/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28278423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neo.2017.01.010 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT frankelarthure digoxinplustrametinibtherapyachievesdiseasecontrolinbrafwildtypemetastaticmelanomapatients AT eskiocakugur digoxinplustrametinibtherapyachievesdiseasecontrolinbrafwildtypemetastaticmelanomapatients AT gilljenniferg digoxinplustrametinibtherapyachievesdiseasecontrolinbrafwildtypemetastaticmelanomapatients AT yuanstacy digoxinplustrametinibtherapyachievesdiseasecontrolinbrafwildtypemetastaticmelanomapatients AT rameshvijayashree digoxinplustrametinibtherapyachievesdiseasecontrolinbrafwildtypemetastaticmelanomapatients AT froehlichthomasw digoxinplustrametinibtherapyachievesdiseasecontrolinbrafwildtypemetastaticmelanomapatients AT ahnchul digoxinplustrametinibtherapyachievesdiseasecontrolinbrafwildtypemetastaticmelanomapatients AT morrisonseanj digoxinplustrametinibtherapyachievesdiseasecontrolinbrafwildtypemetastaticmelanomapatients |