Cargando…
Motivation Measures in Sport: A Critical Review and Bibliometric Analysis
Motivation is widely-researched, in both sport psychology and other fields. As rigorous measurement is essential to understanding this latent construct, a critical appraisal of measurement instruments is needed. Thus, the purpose of this review was to evaluate the six most highly cited motivation me...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5343045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28337165 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00348 |
_version_ | 1782513293858963456 |
---|---|
author | Clancy, Rachel B. Herring, Matthew P. Campbell, Mark J. |
author_facet | Clancy, Rachel B. Herring, Matthew P. Campbell, Mark J. |
author_sort | Clancy, Rachel B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Motivation is widely-researched, in both sport psychology and other fields. As rigorous measurement is essential to understanding this latent construct, a critical appraisal of measurement instruments is needed. Thus, the purpose of this review was to evaluate the six most highly cited motivation measures in sport. Peer-reviewed articles published prior to August 2016 were searched to identify the six most highly cited motivation questionnaires in sport: Sport Motivation Scale (SMS), Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI), Situational Motivational Scale (SIMS), Perceptions of Success Questionnaire (POSQ), Behavioural Regulation in Sport Questionnaire (BRSQ), and Task and Ego Orientation in Sport Questionnaire (TEOSQ). The questionnaires were then evaluated and discussed in four sections: Development, Reliability, Correlates, and Summary. Bibliometric data were also calculated (average weighted impact factor) and assessed (e.g., citations per year) to evaluate the impact of the use of each questionnaire. Despite some variance in their psychometric properties, conceptualization, structure, and utility, the six questionnaires are psychometrically strong instruments for quantifying motivation that are widely supported in the literature. Bibliometric analyses suggested that the IMI ranks first and the SMS ranks sixth according to the average weighted impact factors of their original publications. Consideration of each questionnaire's psychometric strengths/limitations, and conceptualization of motivation in the context of specific research questions should guide researchers in selecting the most appropriate instrument to measure motivation in sport. The average weighted impact factor of each questionnaire is a useful value to consider as well. With these points in mind, recommendations are provided. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5343045 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53430452017-03-23 Motivation Measures in Sport: A Critical Review and Bibliometric Analysis Clancy, Rachel B. Herring, Matthew P. Campbell, Mark J. Front Psychol Psychology Motivation is widely-researched, in both sport psychology and other fields. As rigorous measurement is essential to understanding this latent construct, a critical appraisal of measurement instruments is needed. Thus, the purpose of this review was to evaluate the six most highly cited motivation measures in sport. Peer-reviewed articles published prior to August 2016 were searched to identify the six most highly cited motivation questionnaires in sport: Sport Motivation Scale (SMS), Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI), Situational Motivational Scale (SIMS), Perceptions of Success Questionnaire (POSQ), Behavioural Regulation in Sport Questionnaire (BRSQ), and Task and Ego Orientation in Sport Questionnaire (TEOSQ). The questionnaires were then evaluated and discussed in four sections: Development, Reliability, Correlates, and Summary. Bibliometric data were also calculated (average weighted impact factor) and assessed (e.g., citations per year) to evaluate the impact of the use of each questionnaire. Despite some variance in their psychometric properties, conceptualization, structure, and utility, the six questionnaires are psychometrically strong instruments for quantifying motivation that are widely supported in the literature. Bibliometric analyses suggested that the IMI ranks first and the SMS ranks sixth according to the average weighted impact factors of their original publications. Consideration of each questionnaire's psychometric strengths/limitations, and conceptualization of motivation in the context of specific research questions should guide researchers in selecting the most appropriate instrument to measure motivation in sport. The average weighted impact factor of each questionnaire is a useful value to consider as well. With these points in mind, recommendations are provided. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5343045/ /pubmed/28337165 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00348 Text en Copyright © 2017 Clancy, Herring and Campbell. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Clancy, Rachel B. Herring, Matthew P. Campbell, Mark J. Motivation Measures in Sport: A Critical Review and Bibliometric Analysis |
title | Motivation Measures in Sport: A Critical Review and Bibliometric Analysis |
title_full | Motivation Measures in Sport: A Critical Review and Bibliometric Analysis |
title_fullStr | Motivation Measures in Sport: A Critical Review and Bibliometric Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Motivation Measures in Sport: A Critical Review and Bibliometric Analysis |
title_short | Motivation Measures in Sport: A Critical Review and Bibliometric Analysis |
title_sort | motivation measures in sport: a critical review and bibliometric analysis |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5343045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28337165 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00348 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT clancyrachelb motivationmeasuresinsportacriticalreviewandbibliometricanalysis AT herringmatthewp motivationmeasuresinsportacriticalreviewandbibliometricanalysis AT campbellmarkj motivationmeasuresinsportacriticalreviewandbibliometricanalysis |