Cargando…

Motivation Measures in Sport: A Critical Review and Bibliometric Analysis

Motivation is widely-researched, in both sport psychology and other fields. As rigorous measurement is essential to understanding this latent construct, a critical appraisal of measurement instruments is needed. Thus, the purpose of this review was to evaluate the six most highly cited motivation me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clancy, Rachel B., Herring, Matthew P., Campbell, Mark J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5343045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28337165
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00348
_version_ 1782513293858963456
author Clancy, Rachel B.
Herring, Matthew P.
Campbell, Mark J.
author_facet Clancy, Rachel B.
Herring, Matthew P.
Campbell, Mark J.
author_sort Clancy, Rachel B.
collection PubMed
description Motivation is widely-researched, in both sport psychology and other fields. As rigorous measurement is essential to understanding this latent construct, a critical appraisal of measurement instruments is needed. Thus, the purpose of this review was to evaluate the six most highly cited motivation measures in sport. Peer-reviewed articles published prior to August 2016 were searched to identify the six most highly cited motivation questionnaires in sport: Sport Motivation Scale (SMS), Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI), Situational Motivational Scale (SIMS), Perceptions of Success Questionnaire (POSQ), Behavioural Regulation in Sport Questionnaire (BRSQ), and Task and Ego Orientation in Sport Questionnaire (TEOSQ). The questionnaires were then evaluated and discussed in four sections: Development, Reliability, Correlates, and Summary. Bibliometric data were also calculated (average weighted impact factor) and assessed (e.g., citations per year) to evaluate the impact of the use of each questionnaire. Despite some variance in their psychometric properties, conceptualization, structure, and utility, the six questionnaires are psychometrically strong instruments for quantifying motivation that are widely supported in the literature. Bibliometric analyses suggested that the IMI ranks first and the SMS ranks sixth according to the average weighted impact factors of their original publications. Consideration of each questionnaire's psychometric strengths/limitations, and conceptualization of motivation in the context of specific research questions should guide researchers in selecting the most appropriate instrument to measure motivation in sport. The average weighted impact factor of each questionnaire is a useful value to consider as well. With these points in mind, recommendations are provided.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5343045
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53430452017-03-23 Motivation Measures in Sport: A Critical Review and Bibliometric Analysis Clancy, Rachel B. Herring, Matthew P. Campbell, Mark J. Front Psychol Psychology Motivation is widely-researched, in both sport psychology and other fields. As rigorous measurement is essential to understanding this latent construct, a critical appraisal of measurement instruments is needed. Thus, the purpose of this review was to evaluate the six most highly cited motivation measures in sport. Peer-reviewed articles published prior to August 2016 were searched to identify the six most highly cited motivation questionnaires in sport: Sport Motivation Scale (SMS), Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI), Situational Motivational Scale (SIMS), Perceptions of Success Questionnaire (POSQ), Behavioural Regulation in Sport Questionnaire (BRSQ), and Task and Ego Orientation in Sport Questionnaire (TEOSQ). The questionnaires were then evaluated and discussed in four sections: Development, Reliability, Correlates, and Summary. Bibliometric data were also calculated (average weighted impact factor) and assessed (e.g., citations per year) to evaluate the impact of the use of each questionnaire. Despite some variance in their psychometric properties, conceptualization, structure, and utility, the six questionnaires are psychometrically strong instruments for quantifying motivation that are widely supported in the literature. Bibliometric analyses suggested that the IMI ranks first and the SMS ranks sixth according to the average weighted impact factors of their original publications. Consideration of each questionnaire's psychometric strengths/limitations, and conceptualization of motivation in the context of specific research questions should guide researchers in selecting the most appropriate instrument to measure motivation in sport. The average weighted impact factor of each questionnaire is a useful value to consider as well. With these points in mind, recommendations are provided. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5343045/ /pubmed/28337165 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00348 Text en Copyright © 2017 Clancy, Herring and Campbell. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Clancy, Rachel B.
Herring, Matthew P.
Campbell, Mark J.
Motivation Measures in Sport: A Critical Review and Bibliometric Analysis
title Motivation Measures in Sport: A Critical Review and Bibliometric Analysis
title_full Motivation Measures in Sport: A Critical Review and Bibliometric Analysis
title_fullStr Motivation Measures in Sport: A Critical Review and Bibliometric Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Motivation Measures in Sport: A Critical Review and Bibliometric Analysis
title_short Motivation Measures in Sport: A Critical Review and Bibliometric Analysis
title_sort motivation measures in sport: a critical review and bibliometric analysis
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5343045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28337165
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00348
work_keys_str_mv AT clancyrachelb motivationmeasuresinsportacriticalreviewandbibliometricanalysis
AT herringmatthewp motivationmeasuresinsportacriticalreviewandbibliometricanalysis
AT campbellmarkj motivationmeasuresinsportacriticalreviewandbibliometricanalysis