Cargando…
Cost Effectiveness of Insulin Degludec Plus Liraglutide (IDegLira) in a Fixed Combination for Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Sweden
BACKGROUND: Patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are a priority group for intensified therapy without weight gain and with low risk of hypoglycaemia. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the cost effectiveness of insulin degludec plus liraglutide (IDegLira, Xultophy(®)) compared wit...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5343072/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28063135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40258-016-0301-y |
_version_ | 1782513300032978944 |
---|---|
author | Ericsson, Åsa Lundqvist, Adam |
author_facet | Ericsson, Åsa Lundqvist, Adam |
author_sort | Ericsson, Åsa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are a priority group for intensified therapy without weight gain and with low risk of hypoglycaemia. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the cost effectiveness of insulin degludec plus liraglutide (IDegLira, Xultophy(®)) compared with six potential intensification treatment options for patients with T2DM that is uncontrolled with basal insulin. METHODS: The Swedish Institute for Health Economics (IHE) Cohort Model of Type 2 Diabetes was used with Swedish input data, a 40-year time frame and a societal perspective. The comparators for treatment intensification included insulin glargine, neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin, insulin aspart plus either glargine or NPH, and liraglutide plus either glargine or NPH. Clinical data for all comparators (except NPH insulin) were based on an indirect treatment comparison of several studies. Prices were obtained from the 2014 Swedish Dental and Pharmaceutical Benefits Agency (Tandvårds- och läkemedelsförmånsverket [TLV]) database, and utility values were obtained from published studies. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken. RESULTS: Overall incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were Swedish krona (SEK) 70,000 or lower per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). IDegLira compared with intensified basal insulin showed an ICER of SEK 28,000 per QALY versus insulin glargine, SEK70,000 per QALY versus NPH insulin and SEK 60,000 per QALY versus NPH insulin plus liraglutide. IDegLira was dominant over insulin glargine plus liraglutide and insulin aspart plus insulin glargine or NPH insulin. Results were driven by the difference in glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) reduction between treatments, as confirmed by sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: IDegLira is estimated to be a cost-effective treatment in Sweden compared with commonly used intensification treatments for patients with T2DM uncontrolled with basal insulin. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40258-016-0301-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5343072 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53430722017-03-20 Cost Effectiveness of Insulin Degludec Plus Liraglutide (IDegLira) in a Fixed Combination for Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Sweden Ericsson, Åsa Lundqvist, Adam Appl Health Econ Health Policy Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are a priority group for intensified therapy without weight gain and with low risk of hypoglycaemia. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the cost effectiveness of insulin degludec plus liraglutide (IDegLira, Xultophy(®)) compared with six potential intensification treatment options for patients with T2DM that is uncontrolled with basal insulin. METHODS: The Swedish Institute for Health Economics (IHE) Cohort Model of Type 2 Diabetes was used with Swedish input data, a 40-year time frame and a societal perspective. The comparators for treatment intensification included insulin glargine, neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin, insulin aspart plus either glargine or NPH, and liraglutide plus either glargine or NPH. Clinical data for all comparators (except NPH insulin) were based on an indirect treatment comparison of several studies. Prices were obtained from the 2014 Swedish Dental and Pharmaceutical Benefits Agency (Tandvårds- och läkemedelsförmånsverket [TLV]) database, and utility values were obtained from published studies. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken. RESULTS: Overall incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were Swedish krona (SEK) 70,000 or lower per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). IDegLira compared with intensified basal insulin showed an ICER of SEK 28,000 per QALY versus insulin glargine, SEK70,000 per QALY versus NPH insulin and SEK 60,000 per QALY versus NPH insulin plus liraglutide. IDegLira was dominant over insulin glargine plus liraglutide and insulin aspart plus insulin glargine or NPH insulin. Results were driven by the difference in glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) reduction between treatments, as confirmed by sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: IDegLira is estimated to be a cost-effective treatment in Sweden compared with commonly used intensification treatments for patients with T2DM uncontrolled with basal insulin. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40258-016-0301-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-01-06 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5343072/ /pubmed/28063135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40258-016-0301-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Ericsson, Åsa Lundqvist, Adam Cost Effectiveness of Insulin Degludec Plus Liraglutide (IDegLira) in a Fixed Combination for Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Sweden |
title | Cost Effectiveness of Insulin Degludec Plus Liraglutide (IDegLira) in a Fixed Combination for Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Sweden |
title_full | Cost Effectiveness of Insulin Degludec Plus Liraglutide (IDegLira) in a Fixed Combination for Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Sweden |
title_fullStr | Cost Effectiveness of Insulin Degludec Plus Liraglutide (IDegLira) in a Fixed Combination for Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Sweden |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost Effectiveness of Insulin Degludec Plus Liraglutide (IDegLira) in a Fixed Combination for Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Sweden |
title_short | Cost Effectiveness of Insulin Degludec Plus Liraglutide (IDegLira) in a Fixed Combination for Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Sweden |
title_sort | cost effectiveness of insulin degludec plus liraglutide (ideglira) in a fixed combination for uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus in sweden |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5343072/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28063135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40258-016-0301-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ericssonasa costeffectivenessofinsulindegludecplusliraglutideideglirainafixedcombinationforuncontrolledtype2diabetesmellitusinsweden AT lundqvistadam costeffectivenessofinsulindegludecplusliraglutideideglirainafixedcombinationforuncontrolledtype2diabetesmellitusinsweden |