Cargando…

A Comparison of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds Incorporated with Manuka Honey of Varying UMF

Purpose. Manuka honey (MH) is an antibacterial agent specific to the islands of New Zealand containing both hydrogen peroxide and a Unique Manuka Factor (UMF). Although the antibacterial properties of MH have been studied, the effect of varying UMF of MH incorporated into tissue engineered scaffolds...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hixon, Katherine R., Lu, Tracy, McBride-Gagyi, Sarah H., Janowiak, Blythe E., Sell, Scott A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5343224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28326322
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/4843065
_version_ 1782513323328143360
author Hixon, Katherine R.
Lu, Tracy
McBride-Gagyi, Sarah H.
Janowiak, Blythe E.
Sell, Scott A.
author_facet Hixon, Katherine R.
Lu, Tracy
McBride-Gagyi, Sarah H.
Janowiak, Blythe E.
Sell, Scott A.
author_sort Hixon, Katherine R.
collection PubMed
description Purpose. Manuka honey (MH) is an antibacterial agent specific to the islands of New Zealand containing both hydrogen peroxide and a Unique Manuka Factor (UMF). Although the antibacterial properties of MH have been studied, the effect of varying UMF of MH incorporated into tissue engineered scaffolds have not. Therefore, this study was designed to compare silk fibroin cryogels and electrospun scaffolds incorporated with a 5% MH concentration of various UMF. Methods. Characteristics such as porosity, bacterial clearance and adhesion, and cytotoxicity were compared. Results. Pore diameters for all cryogels were between 51 and 60 µm, while electrospun scaffolds were 10 µm. Cryogels of varying UMF displayed clearance of approximately 0.16 cm for E. coli and S. aureus. In comparison, the electrospun scaffolds clearance ranged between 0.5 and 1 cm. A glucose release of 0.5 mg/mL was observed for the first 24 hours by all scaffolds, regardless of UMF. With respect to cytotoxicity, neither scaffold caused the cell number to drop below 20,000. Conclusions. Overall, when comparing the effects of the various UMF within the two scaffolds, no significant differences were observed. This suggests that the fabricated scaffolds in this study displayed similar bacterial effects regardless of the UMF value.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5343224
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53432242017-03-21 A Comparison of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds Incorporated with Manuka Honey of Varying UMF Hixon, Katherine R. Lu, Tracy McBride-Gagyi, Sarah H. Janowiak, Blythe E. Sell, Scott A. Biomed Res Int Research Article Purpose. Manuka honey (MH) is an antibacterial agent specific to the islands of New Zealand containing both hydrogen peroxide and a Unique Manuka Factor (UMF). Although the antibacterial properties of MH have been studied, the effect of varying UMF of MH incorporated into tissue engineered scaffolds have not. Therefore, this study was designed to compare silk fibroin cryogels and electrospun scaffolds incorporated with a 5% MH concentration of various UMF. Methods. Characteristics such as porosity, bacterial clearance and adhesion, and cytotoxicity were compared. Results. Pore diameters for all cryogels were between 51 and 60 µm, while electrospun scaffolds were 10 µm. Cryogels of varying UMF displayed clearance of approximately 0.16 cm for E. coli and S. aureus. In comparison, the electrospun scaffolds clearance ranged between 0.5 and 1 cm. A glucose release of 0.5 mg/mL was observed for the first 24 hours by all scaffolds, regardless of UMF. With respect to cytotoxicity, neither scaffold caused the cell number to drop below 20,000. Conclusions. Overall, when comparing the effects of the various UMF within the two scaffolds, no significant differences were observed. This suggests that the fabricated scaffolds in this study displayed similar bacterial effects regardless of the UMF value. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2017 2017-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5343224/ /pubmed/28326322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/4843065 Text en Copyright © 2017 Katherine R. Hixon et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hixon, Katherine R.
Lu, Tracy
McBride-Gagyi, Sarah H.
Janowiak, Blythe E.
Sell, Scott A.
A Comparison of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds Incorporated with Manuka Honey of Varying UMF
title A Comparison of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds Incorporated with Manuka Honey of Varying UMF
title_full A Comparison of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds Incorporated with Manuka Honey of Varying UMF
title_fullStr A Comparison of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds Incorporated with Manuka Honey of Varying UMF
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds Incorporated with Manuka Honey of Varying UMF
title_short A Comparison of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds Incorporated with Manuka Honey of Varying UMF
title_sort comparison of tissue engineering scaffolds incorporated with manuka honey of varying umf
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5343224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28326322
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/4843065
work_keys_str_mv AT hixonkatheriner acomparisonoftissueengineeringscaffoldsincorporatedwithmanukahoneyofvaryingumf
AT lutracy acomparisonoftissueengineeringscaffoldsincorporatedwithmanukahoneyofvaryingumf
AT mcbridegagyisarahh acomparisonoftissueengineeringscaffoldsincorporatedwithmanukahoneyofvaryingumf
AT janowiakblythee acomparisonoftissueengineeringscaffoldsincorporatedwithmanukahoneyofvaryingumf
AT sellscotta acomparisonoftissueengineeringscaffoldsincorporatedwithmanukahoneyofvaryingumf
AT hixonkatheriner comparisonoftissueengineeringscaffoldsincorporatedwithmanukahoneyofvaryingumf
AT lutracy comparisonoftissueengineeringscaffoldsincorporatedwithmanukahoneyofvaryingumf
AT mcbridegagyisarahh comparisonoftissueengineeringscaffoldsincorporatedwithmanukahoneyofvaryingumf
AT janowiakblythee comparisonoftissueengineeringscaffoldsincorporatedwithmanukahoneyofvaryingumf
AT sellscotta comparisonoftissueengineeringscaffoldsincorporatedwithmanukahoneyofvaryingumf