Cargando…
Microbial solvent formation revisited by comparative genome analysis
BACKGROUND: Microbial formation of acetone, isopropanol, and butanol is largely restricted to bacteria belonging to the genus Clostridium. This ability has been industrially exploited over the last 100 years. The solvents are important feedstocks for the chemical and biofuel industry. However, biolo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5343299/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28286553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13068-017-0742-z |
_version_ | 1782513339841118208 |
---|---|
author | Poehlein, Anja Solano, José David Montoya Flitsch, Stefanie K. Krabben, Preben Winzer, Klaus Reid, Sharon J. Jones, David T. Green, Edward Minton, Nigel P. Daniel, Rolf Dürre, Peter |
author_facet | Poehlein, Anja Solano, José David Montoya Flitsch, Stefanie K. Krabben, Preben Winzer, Klaus Reid, Sharon J. Jones, David T. Green, Edward Minton, Nigel P. Daniel, Rolf Dürre, Peter |
author_sort | Poehlein, Anja |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Microbial formation of acetone, isopropanol, and butanol is largely restricted to bacteria belonging to the genus Clostridium. This ability has been industrially exploited over the last 100 years. The solvents are important feedstocks for the chemical and biofuel industry. However, biological synthesis suffers from high substrate costs and competition from chemical synthesis supported by the low price of crude oil. To render the biotechnological production economically viable again, improvements in microbial and fermentation performance are necessary. However, no comprehensive comparisons of respective species and strains used and their specific abilities exist today. RESULTS: The genomes of a total 30 saccharolytic Clostridium strains, representative of the species Clostridium acetobutylicum, C. aurantibutyricum, C. beijerinckii, C. diolis, C. felsineum, C. pasteurianum, C. puniceum, C. roseum, C. saccharobutylicum, and C. saccharoperbutylacetonicum, have been determined; 10 of them completely, and compared to 14 published genomes of other solvent-forming clostridia. Two major groups could be differentiated and several misclassified species were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings represent a comprehensive study of phylogeny and taxonomy of clostridial solvent producers that highlights differences in energy conservation mechanisms and substrate utilization between strains, and allow for the first time a direct comparison of sequentially selected industrial strains at the genetic level. Detailed data mining is now possible, supporting the identification of new engineering targets for improved solvent production. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13068-017-0742-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5343299 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53432992017-03-10 Microbial solvent formation revisited by comparative genome analysis Poehlein, Anja Solano, José David Montoya Flitsch, Stefanie K. Krabben, Preben Winzer, Klaus Reid, Sharon J. Jones, David T. Green, Edward Minton, Nigel P. Daniel, Rolf Dürre, Peter Biotechnol Biofuels Research BACKGROUND: Microbial formation of acetone, isopropanol, and butanol is largely restricted to bacteria belonging to the genus Clostridium. This ability has been industrially exploited over the last 100 years. The solvents are important feedstocks for the chemical and biofuel industry. However, biological synthesis suffers from high substrate costs and competition from chemical synthesis supported by the low price of crude oil. To render the biotechnological production economically viable again, improvements in microbial and fermentation performance are necessary. However, no comprehensive comparisons of respective species and strains used and their specific abilities exist today. RESULTS: The genomes of a total 30 saccharolytic Clostridium strains, representative of the species Clostridium acetobutylicum, C. aurantibutyricum, C. beijerinckii, C. diolis, C. felsineum, C. pasteurianum, C. puniceum, C. roseum, C. saccharobutylicum, and C. saccharoperbutylacetonicum, have been determined; 10 of them completely, and compared to 14 published genomes of other solvent-forming clostridia. Two major groups could be differentiated and several misclassified species were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings represent a comprehensive study of phylogeny and taxonomy of clostridial solvent producers that highlights differences in energy conservation mechanisms and substrate utilization between strains, and allow for the first time a direct comparison of sequentially selected industrial strains at the genetic level. Detailed data mining is now possible, supporting the identification of new engineering targets for improved solvent production. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13068-017-0742-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5343299/ /pubmed/28286553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13068-017-0742-z Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Poehlein, Anja Solano, José David Montoya Flitsch, Stefanie K. Krabben, Preben Winzer, Klaus Reid, Sharon J. Jones, David T. Green, Edward Minton, Nigel P. Daniel, Rolf Dürre, Peter Microbial solvent formation revisited by comparative genome analysis |
title | Microbial solvent formation revisited by comparative genome analysis |
title_full | Microbial solvent formation revisited by comparative genome analysis |
title_fullStr | Microbial solvent formation revisited by comparative genome analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Microbial solvent formation revisited by comparative genome analysis |
title_short | Microbial solvent formation revisited by comparative genome analysis |
title_sort | microbial solvent formation revisited by comparative genome analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5343299/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28286553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13068-017-0742-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT poehleinanja microbialsolventformationrevisitedbycomparativegenomeanalysis AT solanojosedavidmontoya microbialsolventformationrevisitedbycomparativegenomeanalysis AT flitschstefaniek microbialsolventformationrevisitedbycomparativegenomeanalysis AT krabbenpreben microbialsolventformationrevisitedbycomparativegenomeanalysis AT winzerklaus microbialsolventformationrevisitedbycomparativegenomeanalysis AT reidsharonj microbialsolventformationrevisitedbycomparativegenomeanalysis AT jonesdavidt microbialsolventformationrevisitedbycomparativegenomeanalysis AT greenedward microbialsolventformationrevisitedbycomparativegenomeanalysis AT mintonnigelp microbialsolventformationrevisitedbycomparativegenomeanalysis AT danielrolf microbialsolventformationrevisitedbycomparativegenomeanalysis AT durrepeter microbialsolventformationrevisitedbycomparativegenomeanalysis |