Cargando…

Microbial solvent formation revisited by comparative genome analysis

BACKGROUND: Microbial formation of acetone, isopropanol, and butanol is largely restricted to bacteria belonging to the genus Clostridium. This ability has been industrially exploited over the last 100 years. The solvents are important feedstocks for the chemical and biofuel industry. However, biolo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poehlein, Anja, Solano, José David Montoya, Flitsch, Stefanie K., Krabben, Preben, Winzer, Klaus, Reid, Sharon J., Jones, David T., Green, Edward, Minton, Nigel P., Daniel, Rolf, Dürre, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5343299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28286553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13068-017-0742-z
_version_ 1782513339841118208
author Poehlein, Anja
Solano, José David Montoya
Flitsch, Stefanie K.
Krabben, Preben
Winzer, Klaus
Reid, Sharon J.
Jones, David T.
Green, Edward
Minton, Nigel P.
Daniel, Rolf
Dürre, Peter
author_facet Poehlein, Anja
Solano, José David Montoya
Flitsch, Stefanie K.
Krabben, Preben
Winzer, Klaus
Reid, Sharon J.
Jones, David T.
Green, Edward
Minton, Nigel P.
Daniel, Rolf
Dürre, Peter
author_sort Poehlein, Anja
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Microbial formation of acetone, isopropanol, and butanol is largely restricted to bacteria belonging to the genus Clostridium. This ability has been industrially exploited over the last 100 years. The solvents are important feedstocks for the chemical and biofuel industry. However, biological synthesis suffers from high substrate costs and competition from chemical synthesis supported by the low price of crude oil. To render the biotechnological production economically viable again, improvements in microbial and fermentation performance are necessary. However, no comprehensive comparisons of respective species and strains used and their specific abilities exist today. RESULTS: The genomes of a total 30 saccharolytic Clostridium strains, representative of the species Clostridium acetobutylicum, C. aurantibutyricum, C. beijerinckii, C. diolis, C. felsineum, C. pasteurianum, C. puniceum, C. roseum, C. saccharobutylicum, and C. saccharoperbutylacetonicum, have been determined; 10 of them completely, and compared to 14 published genomes of other solvent-forming clostridia. Two major groups could be differentiated and several misclassified species were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings represent a comprehensive study of phylogeny and taxonomy of clostridial solvent producers that highlights differences in energy conservation mechanisms and substrate utilization between strains, and allow for the first time a direct comparison of sequentially selected industrial strains at the genetic level. Detailed data mining is now possible, supporting the identification of new engineering targets for improved solvent production. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13068-017-0742-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5343299
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53432992017-03-10 Microbial solvent formation revisited by comparative genome analysis Poehlein, Anja Solano, José David Montoya Flitsch, Stefanie K. Krabben, Preben Winzer, Klaus Reid, Sharon J. Jones, David T. Green, Edward Minton, Nigel P. Daniel, Rolf Dürre, Peter Biotechnol Biofuels Research BACKGROUND: Microbial formation of acetone, isopropanol, and butanol is largely restricted to bacteria belonging to the genus Clostridium. This ability has been industrially exploited over the last 100 years. The solvents are important feedstocks for the chemical and biofuel industry. However, biological synthesis suffers from high substrate costs and competition from chemical synthesis supported by the low price of crude oil. To render the biotechnological production economically viable again, improvements in microbial and fermentation performance are necessary. However, no comprehensive comparisons of respective species and strains used and their specific abilities exist today. RESULTS: The genomes of a total 30 saccharolytic Clostridium strains, representative of the species Clostridium acetobutylicum, C. aurantibutyricum, C. beijerinckii, C. diolis, C. felsineum, C. pasteurianum, C. puniceum, C. roseum, C. saccharobutylicum, and C. saccharoperbutylacetonicum, have been determined; 10 of them completely, and compared to 14 published genomes of other solvent-forming clostridia. Two major groups could be differentiated and several misclassified species were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings represent a comprehensive study of phylogeny and taxonomy of clostridial solvent producers that highlights differences in energy conservation mechanisms and substrate utilization between strains, and allow for the first time a direct comparison of sequentially selected industrial strains at the genetic level. Detailed data mining is now possible, supporting the identification of new engineering targets for improved solvent production. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13068-017-0742-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5343299/ /pubmed/28286553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13068-017-0742-z Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Poehlein, Anja
Solano, José David Montoya
Flitsch, Stefanie K.
Krabben, Preben
Winzer, Klaus
Reid, Sharon J.
Jones, David T.
Green, Edward
Minton, Nigel P.
Daniel, Rolf
Dürre, Peter
Microbial solvent formation revisited by comparative genome analysis
title Microbial solvent formation revisited by comparative genome analysis
title_full Microbial solvent formation revisited by comparative genome analysis
title_fullStr Microbial solvent formation revisited by comparative genome analysis
title_full_unstemmed Microbial solvent formation revisited by comparative genome analysis
title_short Microbial solvent formation revisited by comparative genome analysis
title_sort microbial solvent formation revisited by comparative genome analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5343299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28286553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13068-017-0742-z
work_keys_str_mv AT poehleinanja microbialsolventformationrevisitedbycomparativegenomeanalysis
AT solanojosedavidmontoya microbialsolventformationrevisitedbycomparativegenomeanalysis
AT flitschstefaniek microbialsolventformationrevisitedbycomparativegenomeanalysis
AT krabbenpreben microbialsolventformationrevisitedbycomparativegenomeanalysis
AT winzerklaus microbialsolventformationrevisitedbycomparativegenomeanalysis
AT reidsharonj microbialsolventformationrevisitedbycomparativegenomeanalysis
AT jonesdavidt microbialsolventformationrevisitedbycomparativegenomeanalysis
AT greenedward microbialsolventformationrevisitedbycomparativegenomeanalysis
AT mintonnigelp microbialsolventformationrevisitedbycomparativegenomeanalysis
AT danielrolf microbialsolventformationrevisitedbycomparativegenomeanalysis
AT durrepeter microbialsolventformationrevisitedbycomparativegenomeanalysis