Cargando…

Properties of STAT1 and IRF1 enhancers and the influence of SNPs

BACKGROUND: STAT1 and IRF1 collaborate to induce interferon-γ (IFNγ) stimulated genes (ISGs), but the extent to which they act alone or together is unclear. The effect of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on in vivo binding is also largely unknown. RESULTS: We show that IRF1 binds at proximal o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abou El Hassan, Mohamed, Huang, Katherine, Eswara, Manoja B. K., Xu, Zhaodong, Yu, Tao, Aubry, Arthur, Ni, Zuyao, Livne-bar, Izzy, Sangwan, Monika, Ahmad, Mohamad, Bremner, Rod
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5343312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28274199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12867-017-0084-1
_version_ 1782513342937563136
author Abou El Hassan, Mohamed
Huang, Katherine
Eswara, Manoja B. K.
Xu, Zhaodong
Yu, Tao
Aubry, Arthur
Ni, Zuyao
Livne-bar, Izzy
Sangwan, Monika
Ahmad, Mohamad
Bremner, Rod
author_facet Abou El Hassan, Mohamed
Huang, Katherine
Eswara, Manoja B. K.
Xu, Zhaodong
Yu, Tao
Aubry, Arthur
Ni, Zuyao
Livne-bar, Izzy
Sangwan, Monika
Ahmad, Mohamad
Bremner, Rod
author_sort Abou El Hassan, Mohamed
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: STAT1 and IRF1 collaborate to induce interferon-γ (IFNγ) stimulated genes (ISGs), but the extent to which they act alone or together is unclear. The effect of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on in vivo binding is also largely unknown. RESULTS: We show that IRF1 binds at proximal or distant ISG sites twice as often as STAT1, increasing to sixfold at the MHC class I locus. STAT1 almost always bound with IRF1, while most IRF1 binding events were isolated. Dual binding sites at remote or proximal enhancers distinguished ISGs that were responsive to IFNγ versus cell-specific resistant ISGs, which showed fewer and mainly single binding events. Surprisingly, inducibility in one cell type predicted ISG-responsiveness in other cells. Several dbSNPs overlapped with STAT1 and IRF1 binding motifs, and we developed methodology to rapidly assess their effects. We show that in silico prediction of SNP effects accurately reflects altered binding both in vitro and in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: These data reveal broad cooperation between STAT1 and IRF1, explain cell type specific differences in ISG-responsiveness, and identify genetic variants that may participate in the pathogenesis of immune disorders. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12867-017-0084-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5343312
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53433122017-03-10 Properties of STAT1 and IRF1 enhancers and the influence of SNPs Abou El Hassan, Mohamed Huang, Katherine Eswara, Manoja B. K. Xu, Zhaodong Yu, Tao Aubry, Arthur Ni, Zuyao Livne-bar, Izzy Sangwan, Monika Ahmad, Mohamad Bremner, Rod BMC Mol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: STAT1 and IRF1 collaborate to induce interferon-γ (IFNγ) stimulated genes (ISGs), but the extent to which they act alone or together is unclear. The effect of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on in vivo binding is also largely unknown. RESULTS: We show that IRF1 binds at proximal or distant ISG sites twice as often as STAT1, increasing to sixfold at the MHC class I locus. STAT1 almost always bound with IRF1, while most IRF1 binding events were isolated. Dual binding sites at remote or proximal enhancers distinguished ISGs that were responsive to IFNγ versus cell-specific resistant ISGs, which showed fewer and mainly single binding events. Surprisingly, inducibility in one cell type predicted ISG-responsiveness in other cells. Several dbSNPs overlapped with STAT1 and IRF1 binding motifs, and we developed methodology to rapidly assess their effects. We show that in silico prediction of SNP effects accurately reflects altered binding both in vitro and in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: These data reveal broad cooperation between STAT1 and IRF1, explain cell type specific differences in ISG-responsiveness, and identify genetic variants that may participate in the pathogenesis of immune disorders. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12867-017-0084-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5343312/ /pubmed/28274199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12867-017-0084-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Abou El Hassan, Mohamed
Huang, Katherine
Eswara, Manoja B. K.
Xu, Zhaodong
Yu, Tao
Aubry, Arthur
Ni, Zuyao
Livne-bar, Izzy
Sangwan, Monika
Ahmad, Mohamad
Bremner, Rod
Properties of STAT1 and IRF1 enhancers and the influence of SNPs
title Properties of STAT1 and IRF1 enhancers and the influence of SNPs
title_full Properties of STAT1 and IRF1 enhancers and the influence of SNPs
title_fullStr Properties of STAT1 and IRF1 enhancers and the influence of SNPs
title_full_unstemmed Properties of STAT1 and IRF1 enhancers and the influence of SNPs
title_short Properties of STAT1 and IRF1 enhancers and the influence of SNPs
title_sort properties of stat1 and irf1 enhancers and the influence of snps
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5343312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28274199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12867-017-0084-1
work_keys_str_mv AT abouelhassanmohamed propertiesofstat1andirf1enhancersandtheinfluenceofsnps
AT huangkatherine propertiesofstat1andirf1enhancersandtheinfluenceofsnps
AT eswaramanojabk propertiesofstat1andirf1enhancersandtheinfluenceofsnps
AT xuzhaodong propertiesofstat1andirf1enhancersandtheinfluenceofsnps
AT yutao propertiesofstat1andirf1enhancersandtheinfluenceofsnps
AT aubryarthur propertiesofstat1andirf1enhancersandtheinfluenceofsnps
AT nizuyao propertiesofstat1andirf1enhancersandtheinfluenceofsnps
AT livnebarizzy propertiesofstat1andirf1enhancersandtheinfluenceofsnps
AT sangwanmonika propertiesofstat1andirf1enhancersandtheinfluenceofsnps
AT ahmadmohamad propertiesofstat1andirf1enhancersandtheinfluenceofsnps
AT bremnerrod propertiesofstat1andirf1enhancersandtheinfluenceofsnps