Cargando…

Success rate in implant-supported overdenture and implant-supported fixed denture in cleft lip and palate patients

BACKGROUND: The prosthetic treatment in cleft patients is challenging. Based on this, the aim of this study was to evaluate the longevity of prosthetic rehabilitation treatment with implant-supported overdenture (IOD) and implant-supported fixed denture (IFD) in cleft lip and palate patients in a pe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zanolla, Jaine, Amado, Flávio Monteiro, da Silva, Willian Saranholi, Ayub, Bruno, de Almeida, Ana Lúcia Pompéia Fraga, Soares, Simone
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5343632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28299262
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.200338
_version_ 1782513403343929344
author Zanolla, Jaine
Amado, Flávio Monteiro
da Silva, Willian Saranholi
Ayub, Bruno
de Almeida, Ana Lúcia Pompéia Fraga
Soares, Simone
author_facet Zanolla, Jaine
Amado, Flávio Monteiro
da Silva, Willian Saranholi
Ayub, Bruno
de Almeida, Ana Lúcia Pompéia Fraga
Soares, Simone
author_sort Zanolla, Jaine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The prosthetic treatment in cleft patients is challenging. Based on this, the aim of this study was to evaluate the longevity of prosthetic rehabilitation treatment with implant-supported overdenture (IOD) and implant-supported fixed denture (IFD) in cleft lip and palate patients in a period of 22 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of 72 patients were analyzed (29 males and 43 females), and the survival rate of the implants was evaluated. Moreover, the prostheses’ time of use and the reason for the changing of these were also evaluated. RESULTS: Four-hundred-seventeen implants were installed, and 370 implants survive today. The mean survival time of the implants was 7.6 years. Regarding the 97 prostheses made, the time of average use was 3.28 for the IFDs and 3.92 for IODs. The reasons for the replacements of the prostheses were mainly: fracture of the acrylic base (29.6%) and loss of vertical dimension of occlusion (VDO) (18.5%) in the IFDs. Moreover, in IODs, these were accounted for the loss of VDO due to teeth damage (17.2%) and implant loss (14.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The maintenance of the prostheses was challenging because the patients had difficulties returning for periodic control, but this fact did not result in the decrease of the success rate of the implants. The longevity of implants and prostheses was satisfactory; however, the prostheses showed repetitions mainly due to the wear of the teeth, with decreased vertical dimension and fracture of acrylic base.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5343632
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53436322017-03-15 Success rate in implant-supported overdenture and implant-supported fixed denture in cleft lip and palate patients Zanolla, Jaine Amado, Flávio Monteiro da Silva, Willian Saranholi Ayub, Bruno de Almeida, Ana Lúcia Pompéia Fraga Soares, Simone Ann Maxillofac Surg Original Article - Retrospective Study BACKGROUND: The prosthetic treatment in cleft patients is challenging. Based on this, the aim of this study was to evaluate the longevity of prosthetic rehabilitation treatment with implant-supported overdenture (IOD) and implant-supported fixed denture (IFD) in cleft lip and palate patients in a period of 22 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of 72 patients were analyzed (29 males and 43 females), and the survival rate of the implants was evaluated. Moreover, the prostheses’ time of use and the reason for the changing of these were also evaluated. RESULTS: Four-hundred-seventeen implants were installed, and 370 implants survive today. The mean survival time of the implants was 7.6 years. Regarding the 97 prostheses made, the time of average use was 3.28 for the IFDs and 3.92 for IODs. The reasons for the replacements of the prostheses were mainly: fracture of the acrylic base (29.6%) and loss of vertical dimension of occlusion (VDO) (18.5%) in the IFDs. Moreover, in IODs, these were accounted for the loss of VDO due to teeth damage (17.2%) and implant loss (14.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The maintenance of the prostheses was challenging because the patients had difficulties returning for periodic control, but this fact did not result in the decrease of the success rate of the implants. The longevity of implants and prostheses was satisfactory; however, the prostheses showed repetitions mainly due to the wear of the teeth, with decreased vertical dimension and fracture of acrylic base. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5343632/ /pubmed/28299262 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.200338 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article - Retrospective Study
Zanolla, Jaine
Amado, Flávio Monteiro
da Silva, Willian Saranholi
Ayub, Bruno
de Almeida, Ana Lúcia Pompéia Fraga
Soares, Simone
Success rate in implant-supported overdenture and implant-supported fixed denture in cleft lip and palate patients
title Success rate in implant-supported overdenture and implant-supported fixed denture in cleft lip and palate patients
title_full Success rate in implant-supported overdenture and implant-supported fixed denture in cleft lip and palate patients
title_fullStr Success rate in implant-supported overdenture and implant-supported fixed denture in cleft lip and palate patients
title_full_unstemmed Success rate in implant-supported overdenture and implant-supported fixed denture in cleft lip and palate patients
title_short Success rate in implant-supported overdenture and implant-supported fixed denture in cleft lip and palate patients
title_sort success rate in implant-supported overdenture and implant-supported fixed denture in cleft lip and palate patients
topic Original Article - Retrospective Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5343632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28299262
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.200338
work_keys_str_mv AT zanollajaine successrateinimplantsupportedoverdentureandimplantsupportedfixeddentureincleftlipandpalatepatients
AT amadoflaviomonteiro successrateinimplantsupportedoverdentureandimplantsupportedfixeddentureincleftlipandpalatepatients
AT dasilvawilliansaranholi successrateinimplantsupportedoverdentureandimplantsupportedfixeddentureincleftlipandpalatepatients
AT ayubbruno successrateinimplantsupportedoverdentureandimplantsupportedfixeddentureincleftlipandpalatepatients
AT dealmeidaanaluciapompeiafraga successrateinimplantsupportedoverdentureandimplantsupportedfixeddentureincleftlipandpalatepatients
AT soaressimone successrateinimplantsupportedoverdentureandimplantsupportedfixeddentureincleftlipandpalatepatients