Cargando…

Analysis of the Mechanical Behavior and Surface Rugosity of Different Dental Die Materials

AIM: This work evaluated the mechanical and surface behavior of different die materials. The studied materials are polyurethane resin Exakto-Form (Bredent), Gypsum type IV, Fuji Rock EP (Gc), and Durone (Dentsply). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two metallic matrices molded in polyvinyl siloxane provided 30...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Niekawa, Ciro T., Kreve, Simone, A'vila, Gisseli Bertozzi, Godoy, Gilmar Gil, Eduardo Vieira da Silva, J. R., Dias, Sergio Candido
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5343681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28316947
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.200706
_version_ 1782513412689887232
author Niekawa, Ciro T.
Kreve, Simone
A'vila, Gisseli Bertozzi
Godoy, Gilmar Gil
Eduardo Vieira da Silva, J. R.
Dias, Sergio Candido
author_facet Niekawa, Ciro T.
Kreve, Simone
A'vila, Gisseli Bertozzi
Godoy, Gilmar Gil
Eduardo Vieira da Silva, J. R.
Dias, Sergio Candido
author_sort Niekawa, Ciro T.
collection PubMed
description AIM: This work evaluated the mechanical and surface behavior of different die materials. The studied materials are polyurethane resin Exakto-Form (Bredent), Gypsum type IV, Fuji Rock EP (Gc), and Durone (Dentsply). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two metallic matrices molded in polyvinyl siloxane provided 30 cylindrical test specimens for the diametral compression test and 30 hemispherical test specimens for the surface rugosity test. The cylindrical test specimens were submitted to tests of diametral compression strength using a DL2000 universal assay machine, with a load cell of 2000 Kgf and constant speed of 1 mm/min connected to the software. Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn's nonparametric tests were used to analyze the results. The hemispheres were submitted to the surface rugosity assay using a SJ201-P rugosimeter with a sensitivity of 300 μm, speed of 0.5 mm/s, and cut-off of 0.8 mm, and the readings were taken on the convex surface of the test specimens and metallic matrix. Results were analyzed using with Fisher's least significant differences test (LSD) and Dunnett's test. RESULTS: Kruskal–Wallis test showed significant difference between die materials for diametral compression strength (P = 0.002). Dunn's test showed significantly higher values for modified polyurethane resin (Exakto-Form). The gypsum type IV, which did not significantly differ regarding diametral compression strength, showed 34.0% (Durone) and 42.7% (Fuji Rock) lower values in comparison to Exakto-Form. CONCLUSION: Within the parameters adopted in this study, it is possible to conclude that Exakto-Form polyurethane resin showed higher resistance to compression and was closer to the metallic matrix rugosity, and, along with the gypsum type IV Durone, showed better reproducibility of details relative to the Fuji Rock.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5343681
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53436812017-03-17 Analysis of the Mechanical Behavior and Surface Rugosity of Different Dental Die Materials Niekawa, Ciro T. Kreve, Simone A'vila, Gisseli Bertozzi Godoy, Gilmar Gil Eduardo Vieira da Silva, J. R. Dias, Sergio Candido J Int Soc Prev Community Dent Original Article AIM: This work evaluated the mechanical and surface behavior of different die materials. The studied materials are polyurethane resin Exakto-Form (Bredent), Gypsum type IV, Fuji Rock EP (Gc), and Durone (Dentsply). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two metallic matrices molded in polyvinyl siloxane provided 30 cylindrical test specimens for the diametral compression test and 30 hemispherical test specimens for the surface rugosity test. The cylindrical test specimens were submitted to tests of diametral compression strength using a DL2000 universal assay machine, with a load cell of 2000 Kgf and constant speed of 1 mm/min connected to the software. Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn's nonparametric tests were used to analyze the results. The hemispheres were submitted to the surface rugosity assay using a SJ201-P rugosimeter with a sensitivity of 300 μm, speed of 0.5 mm/s, and cut-off of 0.8 mm, and the readings were taken on the convex surface of the test specimens and metallic matrix. Results were analyzed using with Fisher's least significant differences test (LSD) and Dunnett's test. RESULTS: Kruskal–Wallis test showed significant difference between die materials for diametral compression strength (P = 0.002). Dunn's test showed significantly higher values for modified polyurethane resin (Exakto-Form). The gypsum type IV, which did not significantly differ regarding diametral compression strength, showed 34.0% (Durone) and 42.7% (Fuji Rock) lower values in comparison to Exakto-Form. CONCLUSION: Within the parameters adopted in this study, it is possible to conclude that Exakto-Form polyurethane resin showed higher resistance to compression and was closer to the metallic matrix rugosity, and, along with the gypsum type IV Durone, showed better reproducibility of details relative to the Fuji Rock. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 2017-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5343681/ /pubmed/28316947 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.200706 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Niekawa, Ciro T.
Kreve, Simone
A'vila, Gisseli Bertozzi
Godoy, Gilmar Gil
Eduardo Vieira da Silva, J. R.
Dias, Sergio Candido
Analysis of the Mechanical Behavior and Surface Rugosity of Different Dental Die Materials
title Analysis of the Mechanical Behavior and Surface Rugosity of Different Dental Die Materials
title_full Analysis of the Mechanical Behavior and Surface Rugosity of Different Dental Die Materials
title_fullStr Analysis of the Mechanical Behavior and Surface Rugosity of Different Dental Die Materials
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the Mechanical Behavior and Surface Rugosity of Different Dental Die Materials
title_short Analysis of the Mechanical Behavior and Surface Rugosity of Different Dental Die Materials
title_sort analysis of the mechanical behavior and surface rugosity of different dental die materials
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5343681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28316947
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.200706
work_keys_str_mv AT niekawacirot analysisofthemechanicalbehaviorandsurfacerugosityofdifferentdentaldiematerials
AT krevesimone analysisofthemechanicalbehaviorandsurfacerugosityofdifferentdentaldiematerials
AT avilagisselibertozzi analysisofthemechanicalbehaviorandsurfacerugosityofdifferentdentaldiematerials
AT godoygilmargil analysisofthemechanicalbehaviorandsurfacerugosityofdifferentdentaldiematerials
AT eduardovieiradasilvajr analysisofthemechanicalbehaviorandsurfacerugosityofdifferentdentaldiematerials
AT diassergiocandido analysisofthemechanicalbehaviorandsurfacerugosityofdifferentdentaldiematerials