Cargando…

Testing Human Skin and Respiratory Sensitizers—What Is Good Enough?

Alternative methods for accurate in vitro assessment of skin and respiratory sensitizers are urgently needed. Sensitization is a complex biological process that cannot be evaluated accurately using single events or biomarkers, since the information content is too restricted in these measurements. On...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malmborg, Anki, Borrebaeck, Carl A. K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5343778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28125016
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18020241
_version_ 1782513421667794944
author Malmborg, Anki
Borrebaeck, Carl A. K.
author_facet Malmborg, Anki
Borrebaeck, Carl A. K.
author_sort Malmborg, Anki
collection PubMed
description Alternative methods for accurate in vitro assessment of skin and respiratory sensitizers are urgently needed. Sensitization is a complex biological process that cannot be evaluated accurately using single events or biomarkers, since the information content is too restricted in these measurements. On the contrary, if the tremendous information content harbored in DNA/mRNA could be mined, most complex biological processes could be elucidated. Genomic technologies available today, including transcriptional profiling and next generation sequencing, have the power to decipher sensitization, when used in the right context. Thus, a genomic test platform has been developed, denoted the Genomic Allergen Rapid Detection (GARD) assay. Due to the high informational content of the GARD test, accurate predictions of both the skin and respiratory sensitizing capacity of chemicals, have been demonstrated. Based on a matured dendritic cell line, acting as a human-like reporter system, information about potency has also been acquired. Consequently, multiparametric diagnostic technologies are disruptive test principles that can change the way in which the next generation of alternative methods are designed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5343778
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53437782017-03-16 Testing Human Skin and Respiratory Sensitizers—What Is Good Enough? Malmborg, Anki Borrebaeck, Carl A. K. Int J Mol Sci Commentary Alternative methods for accurate in vitro assessment of skin and respiratory sensitizers are urgently needed. Sensitization is a complex biological process that cannot be evaluated accurately using single events or biomarkers, since the information content is too restricted in these measurements. On the contrary, if the tremendous information content harbored in DNA/mRNA could be mined, most complex biological processes could be elucidated. Genomic technologies available today, including transcriptional profiling and next generation sequencing, have the power to decipher sensitization, when used in the right context. Thus, a genomic test platform has been developed, denoted the Genomic Allergen Rapid Detection (GARD) assay. Due to the high informational content of the GARD test, accurate predictions of both the skin and respiratory sensitizing capacity of chemicals, have been demonstrated. Based on a matured dendritic cell line, acting as a human-like reporter system, information about potency has also been acquired. Consequently, multiparametric diagnostic technologies are disruptive test principles that can change the way in which the next generation of alternative methods are designed. MDPI 2017-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5343778/ /pubmed/28125016 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18020241 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Commentary
Malmborg, Anki
Borrebaeck, Carl A. K.
Testing Human Skin and Respiratory Sensitizers—What Is Good Enough?
title Testing Human Skin and Respiratory Sensitizers—What Is Good Enough?
title_full Testing Human Skin and Respiratory Sensitizers—What Is Good Enough?
title_fullStr Testing Human Skin and Respiratory Sensitizers—What Is Good Enough?
title_full_unstemmed Testing Human Skin and Respiratory Sensitizers—What Is Good Enough?
title_short Testing Human Skin and Respiratory Sensitizers—What Is Good Enough?
title_sort testing human skin and respiratory sensitizers—what is good enough?
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5343778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28125016
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18020241
work_keys_str_mv AT malmborganki testinghumanskinandrespiratorysensitizerswhatisgoodenough
AT borrebaeckcarlak testinghumanskinandrespiratorysensitizerswhatisgoodenough