Cargando…
The Glia Response after Peripheral Nerve Injury: A Comparison between Schwann Cells and Olfactory Ensheathing Cells and Their Uses for Neural Regenerative Therapies
The peripheral nervous system (PNS) exhibits a much larger capacity for regeneration than the central nervous system (CNS). One reason for this difference is the difference in glial cell types between the two systems. PNS glia respond rapidly to nerve injury by clearing debris from the injury site,...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5343823/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28146061 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18020287 |
_version_ | 1782513431991025664 |
---|---|
author | Barton, Matthew J. St John, James Clarke, Mary Wright, Alison Ekberg, Jenny |
author_facet | Barton, Matthew J. St John, James Clarke, Mary Wright, Alison Ekberg, Jenny |
author_sort | Barton, Matthew J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The peripheral nervous system (PNS) exhibits a much larger capacity for regeneration than the central nervous system (CNS). One reason for this difference is the difference in glial cell types between the two systems. PNS glia respond rapidly to nerve injury by clearing debris from the injury site, supplying essential growth factors and providing structural support; all of which enhances neuronal regeneration. Thus, transplantation of glial cells from the PNS is a very promising therapy for injuries to both the PNS and the CNS. There are two key types of PNS glia: olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs), which populate the olfactory nerve, and Schwann cells (SCs), which are present in the rest of the PNS. These two glial types share many similar morphological and functional characteristics but also exhibit key differences. The olfactory nerve is constantly turning over throughout life, which means OECs are continuously stimulating neural regeneration, whilst SCs only promote regeneration after direct injury to the PNS. This review presents a comparison between these two PNS systems in respect to normal physiology, developmental anatomy, glial functions and their responses to injury. A thorough understanding of the mechanisms and differences between the two systems is crucial for the development of future therapies using transplantation of peripheral glia to treat neural injuries and/or disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5343823 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53438232017-03-16 The Glia Response after Peripheral Nerve Injury: A Comparison between Schwann Cells and Olfactory Ensheathing Cells and Their Uses for Neural Regenerative Therapies Barton, Matthew J. St John, James Clarke, Mary Wright, Alison Ekberg, Jenny Int J Mol Sci Review The peripheral nervous system (PNS) exhibits a much larger capacity for regeneration than the central nervous system (CNS). One reason for this difference is the difference in glial cell types between the two systems. PNS glia respond rapidly to nerve injury by clearing debris from the injury site, supplying essential growth factors and providing structural support; all of which enhances neuronal regeneration. Thus, transplantation of glial cells from the PNS is a very promising therapy for injuries to both the PNS and the CNS. There are two key types of PNS glia: olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs), which populate the olfactory nerve, and Schwann cells (SCs), which are present in the rest of the PNS. These two glial types share many similar morphological and functional characteristics but also exhibit key differences. The olfactory nerve is constantly turning over throughout life, which means OECs are continuously stimulating neural regeneration, whilst SCs only promote regeneration after direct injury to the PNS. This review presents a comparison between these two PNS systems in respect to normal physiology, developmental anatomy, glial functions and their responses to injury. A thorough understanding of the mechanisms and differences between the two systems is crucial for the development of future therapies using transplantation of peripheral glia to treat neural injuries and/or disease. MDPI 2017-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5343823/ /pubmed/28146061 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18020287 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Barton, Matthew J. St John, James Clarke, Mary Wright, Alison Ekberg, Jenny The Glia Response after Peripheral Nerve Injury: A Comparison between Schwann Cells and Olfactory Ensheathing Cells and Their Uses for Neural Regenerative Therapies |
title | The Glia Response after Peripheral Nerve Injury: A Comparison between Schwann Cells and Olfactory Ensheathing Cells and Their Uses for Neural Regenerative Therapies |
title_full | The Glia Response after Peripheral Nerve Injury: A Comparison between Schwann Cells and Olfactory Ensheathing Cells and Their Uses for Neural Regenerative Therapies |
title_fullStr | The Glia Response after Peripheral Nerve Injury: A Comparison between Schwann Cells and Olfactory Ensheathing Cells and Their Uses for Neural Regenerative Therapies |
title_full_unstemmed | The Glia Response after Peripheral Nerve Injury: A Comparison between Schwann Cells and Olfactory Ensheathing Cells and Their Uses for Neural Regenerative Therapies |
title_short | The Glia Response after Peripheral Nerve Injury: A Comparison between Schwann Cells and Olfactory Ensheathing Cells and Their Uses for Neural Regenerative Therapies |
title_sort | glia response after peripheral nerve injury: a comparison between schwann cells and olfactory ensheathing cells and their uses for neural regenerative therapies |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5343823/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28146061 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18020287 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bartonmatthewj thegliaresponseafterperipheralnerveinjuryacomparisonbetweenschwanncellsandolfactoryensheathingcellsandtheirusesforneuralregenerativetherapies AT stjohnjames thegliaresponseafterperipheralnerveinjuryacomparisonbetweenschwanncellsandolfactoryensheathingcellsandtheirusesforneuralregenerativetherapies AT clarkemary thegliaresponseafterperipheralnerveinjuryacomparisonbetweenschwanncellsandolfactoryensheathingcellsandtheirusesforneuralregenerativetherapies AT wrightalison thegliaresponseafterperipheralnerveinjuryacomparisonbetweenschwanncellsandolfactoryensheathingcellsandtheirusesforneuralregenerativetherapies AT ekbergjenny thegliaresponseafterperipheralnerveinjuryacomparisonbetweenschwanncellsandolfactoryensheathingcellsandtheirusesforneuralregenerativetherapies AT bartonmatthewj gliaresponseafterperipheralnerveinjuryacomparisonbetweenschwanncellsandolfactoryensheathingcellsandtheirusesforneuralregenerativetherapies AT stjohnjames gliaresponseafterperipheralnerveinjuryacomparisonbetweenschwanncellsandolfactoryensheathingcellsandtheirusesforneuralregenerativetherapies AT clarkemary gliaresponseafterperipheralnerveinjuryacomparisonbetweenschwanncellsandolfactoryensheathingcellsandtheirusesforneuralregenerativetherapies AT wrightalison gliaresponseafterperipheralnerveinjuryacomparisonbetweenschwanncellsandolfactoryensheathingcellsandtheirusesforneuralregenerativetherapies AT ekbergjenny gliaresponseafterperipheralnerveinjuryacomparisonbetweenschwanncellsandolfactoryensheathingcellsandtheirusesforneuralregenerativetherapies |