Cargando…

The Glia Response after Peripheral Nerve Injury: A Comparison between Schwann Cells and Olfactory Ensheathing Cells and Their Uses for Neural Regenerative Therapies

The peripheral nervous system (PNS) exhibits a much larger capacity for regeneration than the central nervous system (CNS). One reason for this difference is the difference in glial cell types between the two systems. PNS glia respond rapidly to nerve injury by clearing debris from the injury site,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barton, Matthew J., St John, James, Clarke, Mary, Wright, Alison, Ekberg, Jenny
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5343823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28146061
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18020287
_version_ 1782513431991025664
author Barton, Matthew J.
St John, James
Clarke, Mary
Wright, Alison
Ekberg, Jenny
author_facet Barton, Matthew J.
St John, James
Clarke, Mary
Wright, Alison
Ekberg, Jenny
author_sort Barton, Matthew J.
collection PubMed
description The peripheral nervous system (PNS) exhibits a much larger capacity for regeneration than the central nervous system (CNS). One reason for this difference is the difference in glial cell types between the two systems. PNS glia respond rapidly to nerve injury by clearing debris from the injury site, supplying essential growth factors and providing structural support; all of which enhances neuronal regeneration. Thus, transplantation of glial cells from the PNS is a very promising therapy for injuries to both the PNS and the CNS. There are two key types of PNS glia: olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs), which populate the olfactory nerve, and Schwann cells (SCs), which are present in the rest of the PNS. These two glial types share many similar morphological and functional characteristics but also exhibit key differences. The olfactory nerve is constantly turning over throughout life, which means OECs are continuously stimulating neural regeneration, whilst SCs only promote regeneration after direct injury to the PNS. This review presents a comparison between these two PNS systems in respect to normal physiology, developmental anatomy, glial functions and their responses to injury. A thorough understanding of the mechanisms and differences between the two systems is crucial for the development of future therapies using transplantation of peripheral glia to treat neural injuries and/or disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5343823
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53438232017-03-16 The Glia Response after Peripheral Nerve Injury: A Comparison between Schwann Cells and Olfactory Ensheathing Cells and Their Uses for Neural Regenerative Therapies Barton, Matthew J. St John, James Clarke, Mary Wright, Alison Ekberg, Jenny Int J Mol Sci Review The peripheral nervous system (PNS) exhibits a much larger capacity for regeneration than the central nervous system (CNS). One reason for this difference is the difference in glial cell types between the two systems. PNS glia respond rapidly to nerve injury by clearing debris from the injury site, supplying essential growth factors and providing structural support; all of which enhances neuronal regeneration. Thus, transplantation of glial cells from the PNS is a very promising therapy for injuries to both the PNS and the CNS. There are two key types of PNS glia: olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs), which populate the olfactory nerve, and Schwann cells (SCs), which are present in the rest of the PNS. These two glial types share many similar morphological and functional characteristics but also exhibit key differences. The olfactory nerve is constantly turning over throughout life, which means OECs are continuously stimulating neural regeneration, whilst SCs only promote regeneration after direct injury to the PNS. This review presents a comparison between these two PNS systems in respect to normal physiology, developmental anatomy, glial functions and their responses to injury. A thorough understanding of the mechanisms and differences between the two systems is crucial for the development of future therapies using transplantation of peripheral glia to treat neural injuries and/or disease. MDPI 2017-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5343823/ /pubmed/28146061 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18020287 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Barton, Matthew J.
St John, James
Clarke, Mary
Wright, Alison
Ekberg, Jenny
The Glia Response after Peripheral Nerve Injury: A Comparison between Schwann Cells and Olfactory Ensheathing Cells and Their Uses for Neural Regenerative Therapies
title The Glia Response after Peripheral Nerve Injury: A Comparison between Schwann Cells and Olfactory Ensheathing Cells and Their Uses for Neural Regenerative Therapies
title_full The Glia Response after Peripheral Nerve Injury: A Comparison between Schwann Cells and Olfactory Ensheathing Cells and Their Uses for Neural Regenerative Therapies
title_fullStr The Glia Response after Peripheral Nerve Injury: A Comparison between Schwann Cells and Olfactory Ensheathing Cells and Their Uses for Neural Regenerative Therapies
title_full_unstemmed The Glia Response after Peripheral Nerve Injury: A Comparison between Schwann Cells and Olfactory Ensheathing Cells and Their Uses for Neural Regenerative Therapies
title_short The Glia Response after Peripheral Nerve Injury: A Comparison between Schwann Cells and Olfactory Ensheathing Cells and Their Uses for Neural Regenerative Therapies
title_sort glia response after peripheral nerve injury: a comparison between schwann cells and olfactory ensheathing cells and their uses for neural regenerative therapies
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5343823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28146061
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18020287
work_keys_str_mv AT bartonmatthewj thegliaresponseafterperipheralnerveinjuryacomparisonbetweenschwanncellsandolfactoryensheathingcellsandtheirusesforneuralregenerativetherapies
AT stjohnjames thegliaresponseafterperipheralnerveinjuryacomparisonbetweenschwanncellsandolfactoryensheathingcellsandtheirusesforneuralregenerativetherapies
AT clarkemary thegliaresponseafterperipheralnerveinjuryacomparisonbetweenschwanncellsandolfactoryensheathingcellsandtheirusesforneuralregenerativetherapies
AT wrightalison thegliaresponseafterperipheralnerveinjuryacomparisonbetweenschwanncellsandolfactoryensheathingcellsandtheirusesforneuralregenerativetherapies
AT ekbergjenny thegliaresponseafterperipheralnerveinjuryacomparisonbetweenschwanncellsandolfactoryensheathingcellsandtheirusesforneuralregenerativetherapies
AT bartonmatthewj gliaresponseafterperipheralnerveinjuryacomparisonbetweenschwanncellsandolfactoryensheathingcellsandtheirusesforneuralregenerativetherapies
AT stjohnjames gliaresponseafterperipheralnerveinjuryacomparisonbetweenschwanncellsandolfactoryensheathingcellsandtheirusesforneuralregenerativetherapies
AT clarkemary gliaresponseafterperipheralnerveinjuryacomparisonbetweenschwanncellsandolfactoryensheathingcellsandtheirusesforneuralregenerativetherapies
AT wrightalison gliaresponseafterperipheralnerveinjuryacomparisonbetweenschwanncellsandolfactoryensheathingcellsandtheirusesforneuralregenerativetherapies
AT ekbergjenny gliaresponseafterperipheralnerveinjuryacomparisonbetweenschwanncellsandolfactoryensheathingcellsandtheirusesforneuralregenerativetherapies