Cargando…
Empirically derived guidance for social scientists to influence environmental policy
Failure to stem trends of ecological disruption and associated loss of ecosystem services worldwide is partly due to the inadequate integration of the human dimension into environmental decision-making. Decision-makers need knowledge of the human dimension of resource systems and of the social conse...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5344331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28278238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171950 |
_version_ | 1782513518387396608 |
---|---|
author | Marshall, Nadine Adger, Neil Attwood, Simon Brown, Katrina Crissman, Charles Cvitanovic, Christopher De Young, Cassandra Gooch, Margaret James, Craig Jessen, Sabine Johnson, Dave Marshall, Paul Park, Sarah Wachenfeld, Dave Wrigley, Damian |
author_facet | Marshall, Nadine Adger, Neil Attwood, Simon Brown, Katrina Crissman, Charles Cvitanovic, Christopher De Young, Cassandra Gooch, Margaret James, Craig Jessen, Sabine Johnson, Dave Marshall, Paul Park, Sarah Wachenfeld, Dave Wrigley, Damian |
author_sort | Marshall, Nadine |
collection | PubMed |
description | Failure to stem trends of ecological disruption and associated loss of ecosystem services worldwide is partly due to the inadequate integration of the human dimension into environmental decision-making. Decision-makers need knowledge of the human dimension of resource systems and of the social consequences of decision-making if environmental management is to be effective and adaptive. Social scientists have a central role to play, but little guidance exists to help them influence decision-making processes. We distil 348 years of cumulative experience shared by 31 environmental experts across three continents into advice for social scientists seeking to increase their influence in the environmental policy arena. Results focus on the importance of process, engagement, empathy and acumen and reveal the importance of understanding and actively participating in policy processes through co-producing knowledge and building trust. The insights gained during this research might empower a science-driven cultural change in science-policy relations for the routine integration of the human dimension in environmental decision making; ultimately for an improved outlook for earth’s ecosystems and the billions of people that depend on them. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5344331 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53443312017-03-29 Empirically derived guidance for social scientists to influence environmental policy Marshall, Nadine Adger, Neil Attwood, Simon Brown, Katrina Crissman, Charles Cvitanovic, Christopher De Young, Cassandra Gooch, Margaret James, Craig Jessen, Sabine Johnson, Dave Marshall, Paul Park, Sarah Wachenfeld, Dave Wrigley, Damian PLoS One Research Article Failure to stem trends of ecological disruption and associated loss of ecosystem services worldwide is partly due to the inadequate integration of the human dimension into environmental decision-making. Decision-makers need knowledge of the human dimension of resource systems and of the social consequences of decision-making if environmental management is to be effective and adaptive. Social scientists have a central role to play, but little guidance exists to help them influence decision-making processes. We distil 348 years of cumulative experience shared by 31 environmental experts across three continents into advice for social scientists seeking to increase their influence in the environmental policy arena. Results focus on the importance of process, engagement, empathy and acumen and reveal the importance of understanding and actively participating in policy processes through co-producing knowledge and building trust. The insights gained during this research might empower a science-driven cultural change in science-policy relations for the routine integration of the human dimension in environmental decision making; ultimately for an improved outlook for earth’s ecosystems and the billions of people that depend on them. Public Library of Science 2017-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5344331/ /pubmed/28278238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171950 Text en © 2017 Marshall et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Marshall, Nadine Adger, Neil Attwood, Simon Brown, Katrina Crissman, Charles Cvitanovic, Christopher De Young, Cassandra Gooch, Margaret James, Craig Jessen, Sabine Johnson, Dave Marshall, Paul Park, Sarah Wachenfeld, Dave Wrigley, Damian Empirically derived guidance for social scientists to influence environmental policy |
title | Empirically derived guidance for social scientists to influence environmental policy |
title_full | Empirically derived guidance for social scientists to influence environmental policy |
title_fullStr | Empirically derived guidance for social scientists to influence environmental policy |
title_full_unstemmed | Empirically derived guidance for social scientists to influence environmental policy |
title_short | Empirically derived guidance for social scientists to influence environmental policy |
title_sort | empirically derived guidance for social scientists to influence environmental policy |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5344331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28278238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171950 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marshallnadine empiricallyderivedguidanceforsocialscientiststoinfluenceenvironmentalpolicy AT adgerneil empiricallyderivedguidanceforsocialscientiststoinfluenceenvironmentalpolicy AT attwoodsimon empiricallyderivedguidanceforsocialscientiststoinfluenceenvironmentalpolicy AT brownkatrina empiricallyderivedguidanceforsocialscientiststoinfluenceenvironmentalpolicy AT crissmancharles empiricallyderivedguidanceforsocialscientiststoinfluenceenvironmentalpolicy AT cvitanovicchristopher empiricallyderivedguidanceforsocialscientiststoinfluenceenvironmentalpolicy AT deyoungcassandra empiricallyderivedguidanceforsocialscientiststoinfluenceenvironmentalpolicy AT goochmargaret empiricallyderivedguidanceforsocialscientiststoinfluenceenvironmentalpolicy AT jamescraig empiricallyderivedguidanceforsocialscientiststoinfluenceenvironmentalpolicy AT jessensabine empiricallyderivedguidanceforsocialscientiststoinfluenceenvironmentalpolicy AT johnsondave empiricallyderivedguidanceforsocialscientiststoinfluenceenvironmentalpolicy AT marshallpaul empiricallyderivedguidanceforsocialscientiststoinfluenceenvironmentalpolicy AT parksarah empiricallyderivedguidanceforsocialscientiststoinfluenceenvironmentalpolicy AT wachenfelddave empiricallyderivedguidanceforsocialscientiststoinfluenceenvironmentalpolicy AT wrigleydamian empiricallyderivedguidanceforsocialscientiststoinfluenceenvironmentalpolicy |