Cargando…

Empirically derived guidance for social scientists to influence environmental policy

Failure to stem trends of ecological disruption and associated loss of ecosystem services worldwide is partly due to the inadequate integration of the human dimension into environmental decision-making. Decision-makers need knowledge of the human dimension of resource systems and of the social conse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marshall, Nadine, Adger, Neil, Attwood, Simon, Brown, Katrina, Crissman, Charles, Cvitanovic, Christopher, De Young, Cassandra, Gooch, Margaret, James, Craig, Jessen, Sabine, Johnson, Dave, Marshall, Paul, Park, Sarah, Wachenfeld, Dave, Wrigley, Damian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5344331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28278238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171950
_version_ 1782513518387396608
author Marshall, Nadine
Adger, Neil
Attwood, Simon
Brown, Katrina
Crissman, Charles
Cvitanovic, Christopher
De Young, Cassandra
Gooch, Margaret
James, Craig
Jessen, Sabine
Johnson, Dave
Marshall, Paul
Park, Sarah
Wachenfeld, Dave
Wrigley, Damian
author_facet Marshall, Nadine
Adger, Neil
Attwood, Simon
Brown, Katrina
Crissman, Charles
Cvitanovic, Christopher
De Young, Cassandra
Gooch, Margaret
James, Craig
Jessen, Sabine
Johnson, Dave
Marshall, Paul
Park, Sarah
Wachenfeld, Dave
Wrigley, Damian
author_sort Marshall, Nadine
collection PubMed
description Failure to stem trends of ecological disruption and associated loss of ecosystem services worldwide is partly due to the inadequate integration of the human dimension into environmental decision-making. Decision-makers need knowledge of the human dimension of resource systems and of the social consequences of decision-making if environmental management is to be effective and adaptive. Social scientists have a central role to play, but little guidance exists to help them influence decision-making processes. We distil 348 years of cumulative experience shared by 31 environmental experts across three continents into advice for social scientists seeking to increase their influence in the environmental policy arena. Results focus on the importance of process, engagement, empathy and acumen and reveal the importance of understanding and actively participating in policy processes through co-producing knowledge and building trust. The insights gained during this research might empower a science-driven cultural change in science-policy relations for the routine integration of the human dimension in environmental decision making; ultimately for an improved outlook for earth’s ecosystems and the billions of people that depend on them.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5344331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53443312017-03-29 Empirically derived guidance for social scientists to influence environmental policy Marshall, Nadine Adger, Neil Attwood, Simon Brown, Katrina Crissman, Charles Cvitanovic, Christopher De Young, Cassandra Gooch, Margaret James, Craig Jessen, Sabine Johnson, Dave Marshall, Paul Park, Sarah Wachenfeld, Dave Wrigley, Damian PLoS One Research Article Failure to stem trends of ecological disruption and associated loss of ecosystem services worldwide is partly due to the inadequate integration of the human dimension into environmental decision-making. Decision-makers need knowledge of the human dimension of resource systems and of the social consequences of decision-making if environmental management is to be effective and adaptive. Social scientists have a central role to play, but little guidance exists to help them influence decision-making processes. We distil 348 years of cumulative experience shared by 31 environmental experts across three continents into advice for social scientists seeking to increase their influence in the environmental policy arena. Results focus on the importance of process, engagement, empathy and acumen and reveal the importance of understanding and actively participating in policy processes through co-producing knowledge and building trust. The insights gained during this research might empower a science-driven cultural change in science-policy relations for the routine integration of the human dimension in environmental decision making; ultimately for an improved outlook for earth’s ecosystems and the billions of people that depend on them. Public Library of Science 2017-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5344331/ /pubmed/28278238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171950 Text en © 2017 Marshall et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Marshall, Nadine
Adger, Neil
Attwood, Simon
Brown, Katrina
Crissman, Charles
Cvitanovic, Christopher
De Young, Cassandra
Gooch, Margaret
James, Craig
Jessen, Sabine
Johnson, Dave
Marshall, Paul
Park, Sarah
Wachenfeld, Dave
Wrigley, Damian
Empirically derived guidance for social scientists to influence environmental policy
title Empirically derived guidance for social scientists to influence environmental policy
title_full Empirically derived guidance for social scientists to influence environmental policy
title_fullStr Empirically derived guidance for social scientists to influence environmental policy
title_full_unstemmed Empirically derived guidance for social scientists to influence environmental policy
title_short Empirically derived guidance for social scientists to influence environmental policy
title_sort empirically derived guidance for social scientists to influence environmental policy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5344331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28278238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171950
work_keys_str_mv AT marshallnadine empiricallyderivedguidanceforsocialscientiststoinfluenceenvironmentalpolicy
AT adgerneil empiricallyderivedguidanceforsocialscientiststoinfluenceenvironmentalpolicy
AT attwoodsimon empiricallyderivedguidanceforsocialscientiststoinfluenceenvironmentalpolicy
AT brownkatrina empiricallyderivedguidanceforsocialscientiststoinfluenceenvironmentalpolicy
AT crissmancharles empiricallyderivedguidanceforsocialscientiststoinfluenceenvironmentalpolicy
AT cvitanovicchristopher empiricallyderivedguidanceforsocialscientiststoinfluenceenvironmentalpolicy
AT deyoungcassandra empiricallyderivedguidanceforsocialscientiststoinfluenceenvironmentalpolicy
AT goochmargaret empiricallyderivedguidanceforsocialscientiststoinfluenceenvironmentalpolicy
AT jamescraig empiricallyderivedguidanceforsocialscientiststoinfluenceenvironmentalpolicy
AT jessensabine empiricallyderivedguidanceforsocialscientiststoinfluenceenvironmentalpolicy
AT johnsondave empiricallyderivedguidanceforsocialscientiststoinfluenceenvironmentalpolicy
AT marshallpaul empiricallyderivedguidanceforsocialscientiststoinfluenceenvironmentalpolicy
AT parksarah empiricallyderivedguidanceforsocialscientiststoinfluenceenvironmentalpolicy
AT wachenfelddave empiricallyderivedguidanceforsocialscientiststoinfluenceenvironmentalpolicy
AT wrigleydamian empiricallyderivedguidanceforsocialscientiststoinfluenceenvironmentalpolicy