Cargando…
The relevance of moral norms in distinct relational contexts: Purity versus harm norms regulate self-directed actions
Recent efforts to partition the space of morality have focused on the descriptive content of distinct moral domains (e.g., harm versus purity), or alternatively, the relationship between the perpetrator and victim of moral violations. Across three studies, we demonstrate that harm and purity norms a...
Autores principales: | Dungan, James A., Chakroff, Alek, Young, Liane |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5344389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28278214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173405 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Harming Ourselves and Defiling Others: What Determines a Moral Domain?
por: Chakroff, Alek, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Correction: Harming Ourselves and Defiling Others: What Determines a Moral Domain?
por: Chakroff, Alek, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Neural substrates for moral judgments of psychological versus physical harm
por: Tsoi, Lily, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Norms and the Flexibility of Moral Action
por: FeldmanHall, Oriel, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Asking ‘why?’ enhances theory of mind when evaluating harm but not purity violations
por: Dungan, James A, et al.
Publicado: (2019)