Cargando…
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal-epidural anesthesia vs. general anaesthesia: a prospective randomised study
PURPOSE: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is usually performed under the general anesthesia (GA). Aim of the study is to investigate the availability, safety and side effects of combined spinal/epidural anesthesia (CSEA) and comparison it with GA for LC. METHODS: Forty-nine patients who have a LC p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Surgical Society
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5344803/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28289667 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2017.92.3.136 |
_version_ | 1782513594569588736 |
---|---|
author | Donmez, Turgut Erdem, Vuslat Muslu Uzman, Sinan Yildirim, Dogan Avaroglu, Huseyin Ferahman, Sina Sunamak, Oguzhan |
author_facet | Donmez, Turgut Erdem, Vuslat Muslu Uzman, Sinan Yildirim, Dogan Avaroglu, Huseyin Ferahman, Sina Sunamak, Oguzhan |
author_sort | Donmez, Turgut |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is usually performed under the general anesthesia (GA). Aim of the study is to investigate the availability, safety and side effects of combined spinal/epidural anesthesia (CSEA) and comparison it with GA for LC. METHODS: Forty-nine patients who have a LC plan were included into the study. The patients were randomly divided into GA (n = 25) and CSEA (n = 24) groups. Intraoperative and postoperative adverse events, postoperative pain levels were compared between groups. RESULTS: Anesthesia procedures and surgeries for all patients were successfully completed. After the organization of pneumoperitoneum in CSEA group, 3 patients suffered from shoulder pain (12.5%) and 4 patients suffered from abdominal discomfort (16.6%). All these complaints were recovered with IV fentanyl administration. Only 1 patient developed hypotension which is recovered with fluid replacement and no need to use vasopressor treatment. Postoperative shoulder pain was significantly less observed in CSEA group (25% vs. 60%). Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was less observed in CSEA group but not statistically significant (4.2% vs. 20%). In the group of CSEA, 3 patients suffered from urinary retention (12.5%) and 2 patients suffered from spinal headache (8.3%). All postoperative pain parameters except 6th hour, were less observed in CSEA group, less VAS scores and less need to analgesic treatment in CSEA group comparing with GA group. CONCLUSION: CSEA can be used safely for laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Less postoperative surgical field pain, shoulder pain and PONV are the advantages of CSEA compared to GA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5344803 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | The Korean Surgical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53448032017-03-13 Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal-epidural anesthesia vs. general anaesthesia: a prospective randomised study Donmez, Turgut Erdem, Vuslat Muslu Uzman, Sinan Yildirim, Dogan Avaroglu, Huseyin Ferahman, Sina Sunamak, Oguzhan Ann Surg Treat Res Original Article PURPOSE: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is usually performed under the general anesthesia (GA). Aim of the study is to investigate the availability, safety and side effects of combined spinal/epidural anesthesia (CSEA) and comparison it with GA for LC. METHODS: Forty-nine patients who have a LC plan were included into the study. The patients were randomly divided into GA (n = 25) and CSEA (n = 24) groups. Intraoperative and postoperative adverse events, postoperative pain levels were compared between groups. RESULTS: Anesthesia procedures and surgeries for all patients were successfully completed. After the organization of pneumoperitoneum in CSEA group, 3 patients suffered from shoulder pain (12.5%) and 4 patients suffered from abdominal discomfort (16.6%). All these complaints were recovered with IV fentanyl administration. Only 1 patient developed hypotension which is recovered with fluid replacement and no need to use vasopressor treatment. Postoperative shoulder pain was significantly less observed in CSEA group (25% vs. 60%). Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was less observed in CSEA group but not statistically significant (4.2% vs. 20%). In the group of CSEA, 3 patients suffered from urinary retention (12.5%) and 2 patients suffered from spinal headache (8.3%). All postoperative pain parameters except 6th hour, were less observed in CSEA group, less VAS scores and less need to analgesic treatment in CSEA group comparing with GA group. CONCLUSION: CSEA can be used safely for laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Less postoperative surgical field pain, shoulder pain and PONV are the advantages of CSEA compared to GA. The Korean Surgical Society 2017-03 2017-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5344803/ /pubmed/28289667 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2017.92.3.136 Text en Copyright © 2017, the Korean Surgical Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research is an Open Access Journal. All articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Donmez, Turgut Erdem, Vuslat Muslu Uzman, Sinan Yildirim, Dogan Avaroglu, Huseyin Ferahman, Sina Sunamak, Oguzhan Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal-epidural anesthesia vs. general anaesthesia: a prospective randomised study |
title | Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal-epidural anesthesia vs. general anaesthesia: a prospective randomised study |
title_full | Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal-epidural anesthesia vs. general anaesthesia: a prospective randomised study |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal-epidural anesthesia vs. general anaesthesia: a prospective randomised study |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal-epidural anesthesia vs. general anaesthesia: a prospective randomised study |
title_short | Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal-epidural anesthesia vs. general anaesthesia: a prospective randomised study |
title_sort | laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal-epidural anesthesia vs. general anaesthesia: a prospective randomised study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5344803/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28289667 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2017.92.3.136 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT donmezturgut laparoscopiccholecystectomyunderspinalepiduralanesthesiavsgeneralanaesthesiaaprospectiverandomisedstudy AT erdemvuslatmuslu laparoscopiccholecystectomyunderspinalepiduralanesthesiavsgeneralanaesthesiaaprospectiverandomisedstudy AT uzmansinan laparoscopiccholecystectomyunderspinalepiduralanesthesiavsgeneralanaesthesiaaprospectiverandomisedstudy AT yildirimdogan laparoscopiccholecystectomyunderspinalepiduralanesthesiavsgeneralanaesthesiaaprospectiverandomisedstudy AT avarogluhuseyin laparoscopiccholecystectomyunderspinalepiduralanesthesiavsgeneralanaesthesiaaprospectiverandomisedstudy AT ferahmansina laparoscopiccholecystectomyunderspinalepiduralanesthesiavsgeneralanaesthesiaaprospectiverandomisedstudy AT sunamakoguzhan laparoscopiccholecystectomyunderspinalepiduralanesthesiavsgeneralanaesthesiaaprospectiverandomisedstudy |