Cargando…

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal-epidural anesthesia vs. general anaesthesia: a prospective randomised study

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is usually performed under the general anesthesia (GA). Aim of the study is to investigate the availability, safety and side effects of combined spinal/epidural anesthesia (CSEA) and comparison it with GA for LC. METHODS: Forty-nine patients who have a LC p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Donmez, Turgut, Erdem, Vuslat Muslu, Uzman, Sinan, Yildirim, Dogan, Avaroglu, Huseyin, Ferahman, Sina, Sunamak, Oguzhan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Surgical Society 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5344803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28289667
http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2017.92.3.136
_version_ 1782513594569588736
author Donmez, Turgut
Erdem, Vuslat Muslu
Uzman, Sinan
Yildirim, Dogan
Avaroglu, Huseyin
Ferahman, Sina
Sunamak, Oguzhan
author_facet Donmez, Turgut
Erdem, Vuslat Muslu
Uzman, Sinan
Yildirim, Dogan
Avaroglu, Huseyin
Ferahman, Sina
Sunamak, Oguzhan
author_sort Donmez, Turgut
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is usually performed under the general anesthesia (GA). Aim of the study is to investigate the availability, safety and side effects of combined spinal/epidural anesthesia (CSEA) and comparison it with GA for LC. METHODS: Forty-nine patients who have a LC plan were included into the study. The patients were randomly divided into GA (n = 25) and CSEA (n = 24) groups. Intraoperative and postoperative adverse events, postoperative pain levels were compared between groups. RESULTS: Anesthesia procedures and surgeries for all patients were successfully completed. After the organization of pneumoperitoneum in CSEA group, 3 patients suffered from shoulder pain (12.5%) and 4 patients suffered from abdominal discomfort (16.6%). All these complaints were recovered with IV fentanyl administration. Only 1 patient developed hypotension which is recovered with fluid replacement and no need to use vasopressor treatment. Postoperative shoulder pain was significantly less observed in CSEA group (25% vs. 60%). Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was less observed in CSEA group but not statistically significant (4.2% vs. 20%). In the group of CSEA, 3 patients suffered from urinary retention (12.5%) and 2 patients suffered from spinal headache (8.3%). All postoperative pain parameters except 6th hour, were less observed in CSEA group, less VAS scores and less need to analgesic treatment in CSEA group comparing with GA group. CONCLUSION: CSEA can be used safely for laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Less postoperative surgical field pain, shoulder pain and PONV are the advantages of CSEA compared to GA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5344803
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Korean Surgical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53448032017-03-13 Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal-epidural anesthesia vs. general anaesthesia: a prospective randomised study Donmez, Turgut Erdem, Vuslat Muslu Uzman, Sinan Yildirim, Dogan Avaroglu, Huseyin Ferahman, Sina Sunamak, Oguzhan Ann Surg Treat Res Original Article PURPOSE: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is usually performed under the general anesthesia (GA). Aim of the study is to investigate the availability, safety and side effects of combined spinal/epidural anesthesia (CSEA) and comparison it with GA for LC. METHODS: Forty-nine patients who have a LC plan were included into the study. The patients were randomly divided into GA (n = 25) and CSEA (n = 24) groups. Intraoperative and postoperative adverse events, postoperative pain levels were compared between groups. RESULTS: Anesthesia procedures and surgeries for all patients were successfully completed. After the organization of pneumoperitoneum in CSEA group, 3 patients suffered from shoulder pain (12.5%) and 4 patients suffered from abdominal discomfort (16.6%). All these complaints were recovered with IV fentanyl administration. Only 1 patient developed hypotension which is recovered with fluid replacement and no need to use vasopressor treatment. Postoperative shoulder pain was significantly less observed in CSEA group (25% vs. 60%). Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was less observed in CSEA group but not statistically significant (4.2% vs. 20%). In the group of CSEA, 3 patients suffered from urinary retention (12.5%) and 2 patients suffered from spinal headache (8.3%). All postoperative pain parameters except 6th hour, were less observed in CSEA group, less VAS scores and less need to analgesic treatment in CSEA group comparing with GA group. CONCLUSION: CSEA can be used safely for laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Less postoperative surgical field pain, shoulder pain and PONV are the advantages of CSEA compared to GA. The Korean Surgical Society 2017-03 2017-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5344803/ /pubmed/28289667 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2017.92.3.136 Text en Copyright © 2017, the Korean Surgical Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research is an Open Access Journal. All articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Donmez, Turgut
Erdem, Vuslat Muslu
Uzman, Sinan
Yildirim, Dogan
Avaroglu, Huseyin
Ferahman, Sina
Sunamak, Oguzhan
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal-epidural anesthesia vs. general anaesthesia: a prospective randomised study
title Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal-epidural anesthesia vs. general anaesthesia: a prospective randomised study
title_full Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal-epidural anesthesia vs. general anaesthesia: a prospective randomised study
title_fullStr Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal-epidural anesthesia vs. general anaesthesia: a prospective randomised study
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal-epidural anesthesia vs. general anaesthesia: a prospective randomised study
title_short Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal-epidural anesthesia vs. general anaesthesia: a prospective randomised study
title_sort laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal-epidural anesthesia vs. general anaesthesia: a prospective randomised study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5344803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28289667
http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2017.92.3.136
work_keys_str_mv AT donmezturgut laparoscopiccholecystectomyunderspinalepiduralanesthesiavsgeneralanaesthesiaaprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT erdemvuslatmuslu laparoscopiccholecystectomyunderspinalepiduralanesthesiavsgeneralanaesthesiaaprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT uzmansinan laparoscopiccholecystectomyunderspinalepiduralanesthesiavsgeneralanaesthesiaaprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT yildirimdogan laparoscopiccholecystectomyunderspinalepiduralanesthesiavsgeneralanaesthesiaaprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT avarogluhuseyin laparoscopiccholecystectomyunderspinalepiduralanesthesiavsgeneralanaesthesiaaprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT ferahmansina laparoscopiccholecystectomyunderspinalepiduralanesthesiavsgeneralanaesthesiaaprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT sunamakoguzhan laparoscopiccholecystectomyunderspinalepiduralanesthesiavsgeneralanaesthesiaaprospectiverandomisedstudy