Cargando…

Revising REACH guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment for engineered nanomaterials for aquatic ecotoxicity endpoints: recommendations from the EnvNano project

The European Chemical Agency (ECHA) is in the process of revising its guidance documents on how to address the challenges of ecotoxicological testing of nanomaterials. In these revisions, outset is taken in the hypothesis that ecotoxicological test methods, developed for soluble chemicals, can be ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hansen, Steffen Foss, Sørensen, Sara Nørgaard, Skjolding, Lars Michael, Hartmann, Nanna B., Baun, Anders
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5344937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28337404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12302-017-0111-3
_version_ 1782513617007017984
author Hansen, Steffen Foss
Sørensen, Sara Nørgaard
Skjolding, Lars Michael
Hartmann, Nanna B.
Baun, Anders
author_facet Hansen, Steffen Foss
Sørensen, Sara Nørgaard
Skjolding, Lars Michael
Hartmann, Nanna B.
Baun, Anders
author_sort Hansen, Steffen Foss
collection PubMed
description The European Chemical Agency (ECHA) is in the process of revising its guidance documents on how to address the challenges of ecotoxicological testing of nanomaterials. In these revisions, outset is taken in the hypothesis that ecotoxicological test methods, developed for soluble chemicals, can be made applicable to nanomaterials. European Research Council project EnvNano—Environmental Effects and Risk Evaluation of Engineered, which ran from 2011 to 2016, took another outset by assuming that: “The behaviour of nanoparticles in suspension is fundamentally different from that of chemicals in solution”. The aim of this paper is to present the findings of the EnvNano project and through these provide the scientific background for specific recommendations on how ECHA guidance could be further improved. Key EnvNano findings such as the need to characterize dispersion and dissolution rates in stock and test media have partially been addressed in the updated guidance. However, it has to be made clear that multiple characterization methods have to be applied to describe state of dispersion and dissolution over time and for various test concentration. More detailed information is called for on the specific characterization methods and techniques available and their pros and cons. Based on findings in EnvNano, we recommend that existing algal tests are supplemented with tests where suspensions of nanomaterials are aged for 1–3 days for nanomaterials that dissolve in testing media. Likewise, for daphnia tests we suggest to supplement with tests where (a) exposure is shortened to a 3 h pulse exposure in daphnia toxicity tests with environmentally hazardous metal and metal oxide nanomaterials prone to dissolution; and (b) food abundance is three to five times higher than normal, respectively. We further suggest that the importance of considering the impact of shading in algal tests is made more detailed in the guidance and that it is specified that determination of uptake, depuration and trophic transfer of nanomaterials for each commercialized functionalization of the nanomaterials is required. Finally, as an outcome of the project a method for assessing the regulatory adequacy of ecotoxicological studies of nanomaterials is proposed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5344937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53449372017-03-21 Revising REACH guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment for engineered nanomaterials for aquatic ecotoxicity endpoints: recommendations from the EnvNano project Hansen, Steffen Foss Sørensen, Sara Nørgaard Skjolding, Lars Michael Hartmann, Nanna B. Baun, Anders Environ Sci Eur Commentary The European Chemical Agency (ECHA) is in the process of revising its guidance documents on how to address the challenges of ecotoxicological testing of nanomaterials. In these revisions, outset is taken in the hypothesis that ecotoxicological test methods, developed for soluble chemicals, can be made applicable to nanomaterials. European Research Council project EnvNano—Environmental Effects and Risk Evaluation of Engineered, which ran from 2011 to 2016, took another outset by assuming that: “The behaviour of nanoparticles in suspension is fundamentally different from that of chemicals in solution”. The aim of this paper is to present the findings of the EnvNano project and through these provide the scientific background for specific recommendations on how ECHA guidance could be further improved. Key EnvNano findings such as the need to characterize dispersion and dissolution rates in stock and test media have partially been addressed in the updated guidance. However, it has to be made clear that multiple characterization methods have to be applied to describe state of dispersion and dissolution over time and for various test concentration. More detailed information is called for on the specific characterization methods and techniques available and their pros and cons. Based on findings in EnvNano, we recommend that existing algal tests are supplemented with tests where suspensions of nanomaterials are aged for 1–3 days for nanomaterials that dissolve in testing media. Likewise, for daphnia tests we suggest to supplement with tests where (a) exposure is shortened to a 3 h pulse exposure in daphnia toxicity tests with environmentally hazardous metal and metal oxide nanomaterials prone to dissolution; and (b) food abundance is three to five times higher than normal, respectively. We further suggest that the importance of considering the impact of shading in algal tests is made more detailed in the guidance and that it is specified that determination of uptake, depuration and trophic transfer of nanomaterials for each commercialized functionalization of the nanomaterials is required. Finally, as an outcome of the project a method for assessing the regulatory adequacy of ecotoxicological studies of nanomaterials is proposed. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-03-09 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5344937/ /pubmed/28337404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12302-017-0111-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Commentary
Hansen, Steffen Foss
Sørensen, Sara Nørgaard
Skjolding, Lars Michael
Hartmann, Nanna B.
Baun, Anders
Revising REACH guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment for engineered nanomaterials for aquatic ecotoxicity endpoints: recommendations from the EnvNano project
title Revising REACH guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment for engineered nanomaterials for aquatic ecotoxicity endpoints: recommendations from the EnvNano project
title_full Revising REACH guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment for engineered nanomaterials for aquatic ecotoxicity endpoints: recommendations from the EnvNano project
title_fullStr Revising REACH guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment for engineered nanomaterials for aquatic ecotoxicity endpoints: recommendations from the EnvNano project
title_full_unstemmed Revising REACH guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment for engineered nanomaterials for aquatic ecotoxicity endpoints: recommendations from the EnvNano project
title_short Revising REACH guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment for engineered nanomaterials for aquatic ecotoxicity endpoints: recommendations from the EnvNano project
title_sort revising reach guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment for engineered nanomaterials for aquatic ecotoxicity endpoints: recommendations from the envnano project
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5344937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28337404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12302-017-0111-3
work_keys_str_mv AT hansensteffenfoss revisingreachguidanceoninformationrequirementsandchemicalsafetyassessmentforengineerednanomaterialsforaquaticecotoxicityendpointsrecommendationsfromtheenvnanoproject
AT sørensensaranørgaard revisingreachguidanceoninformationrequirementsandchemicalsafetyassessmentforengineerednanomaterialsforaquaticecotoxicityendpointsrecommendationsfromtheenvnanoproject
AT skjoldinglarsmichael revisingreachguidanceoninformationrequirementsandchemicalsafetyassessmentforengineerednanomaterialsforaquaticecotoxicityendpointsrecommendationsfromtheenvnanoproject
AT hartmannnannab revisingreachguidanceoninformationrequirementsandchemicalsafetyassessmentforengineerednanomaterialsforaquaticecotoxicityendpointsrecommendationsfromtheenvnanoproject
AT baunanders revisingreachguidanceoninformationrequirementsandchemicalsafetyassessmentforengineerednanomaterialsforaquaticecotoxicityendpointsrecommendationsfromtheenvnanoproject