Cargando…

Quality of the delivery services in health facilities in Northern Ethiopia

BACKGROUND: Substantial improvements have been observed in the coverage of and access to maternal health service, especially in skilled birth attendants, in Ethiopia. However, the quality of care has been lagging behind. Therefore, this study investigated the status of the quality of delivery servic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fisseha, Girmatsion, Berhane, Yemane, Worku, Alemayehu, Terefe, Wondwossen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5345168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28279215
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2125-3
_version_ 1782513664813694976
author Fisseha, Girmatsion
Berhane, Yemane
Worku, Alemayehu
Terefe, Wondwossen
author_facet Fisseha, Girmatsion
Berhane, Yemane
Worku, Alemayehu
Terefe, Wondwossen
author_sort Fisseha, Girmatsion
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Substantial improvements have been observed in the coverage of and access to maternal health service, especially in skilled birth attendants, in Ethiopia. However, the quality of care has been lagging behind. Therefore, this study investigated the status of the quality of delivery services in Northern Ethiopia. METHODS: A facility based survey was conducted from December 2014 to February 2015 in Northern Ethiopia. The quality of delivery service was assessed in 32 health facilities using a facility audit checklist, by reviewing delivery, by conducting in-depth interview and observation, and by conducting exit interviews with eligible mothers. Facilities were considered as ‘good quality’ if they scored positively on 75% of the quality indicators set in the national guidelines for all the three components; input (materials, infrastructure, and human resource), process (adherence to standard care procedures during intrapartum and immediate postpartum periods) and output (the mothers’ satisfaction and utilization of lifesaving procedures). RESULTS: Overall 2 of 32 (6.3%) of the study facilities fulfilled all the three quality components; input, process and output. Two of the three components were assessed as good in 11 of the 32 (34.4%) health facilities. The input quality was the better of the other quality components; which was good in 21 out of the 32 (65.6%) health facilities. The process and output quality was good in only 10 of the 32 (31.3%) facilities. CONCLUSIONS: Only 6.3% of the studied health facilities had good quality in all three dimensions of quality measures that was done in accordance to the national delivery service guidelines. The most compromised quality component was the process. Systematic and sustained efforts need to be strengthened to improve all dimensions of quality in order to achieve the desired quality of delivery services and increase the proportion of births occurring in health facilities. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2125-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5345168
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53451682017-03-14 Quality of the delivery services in health facilities in Northern Ethiopia Fisseha, Girmatsion Berhane, Yemane Worku, Alemayehu Terefe, Wondwossen BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Substantial improvements have been observed in the coverage of and access to maternal health service, especially in skilled birth attendants, in Ethiopia. However, the quality of care has been lagging behind. Therefore, this study investigated the status of the quality of delivery services in Northern Ethiopia. METHODS: A facility based survey was conducted from December 2014 to February 2015 in Northern Ethiopia. The quality of delivery service was assessed in 32 health facilities using a facility audit checklist, by reviewing delivery, by conducting in-depth interview and observation, and by conducting exit interviews with eligible mothers. Facilities were considered as ‘good quality’ if they scored positively on 75% of the quality indicators set in the national guidelines for all the three components; input (materials, infrastructure, and human resource), process (adherence to standard care procedures during intrapartum and immediate postpartum periods) and output (the mothers’ satisfaction and utilization of lifesaving procedures). RESULTS: Overall 2 of 32 (6.3%) of the study facilities fulfilled all the three quality components; input, process and output. Two of the three components were assessed as good in 11 of the 32 (34.4%) health facilities. The input quality was the better of the other quality components; which was good in 21 out of the 32 (65.6%) health facilities. The process and output quality was good in only 10 of the 32 (31.3%) facilities. CONCLUSIONS: Only 6.3% of the studied health facilities had good quality in all three dimensions of quality measures that was done in accordance to the national delivery service guidelines. The most compromised quality component was the process. Systematic and sustained efforts need to be strengthened to improve all dimensions of quality in order to achieve the desired quality of delivery services and increase the proportion of births occurring in health facilities. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2125-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5345168/ /pubmed/28279215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2125-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fisseha, Girmatsion
Berhane, Yemane
Worku, Alemayehu
Terefe, Wondwossen
Quality of the delivery services in health facilities in Northern Ethiopia
title Quality of the delivery services in health facilities in Northern Ethiopia
title_full Quality of the delivery services in health facilities in Northern Ethiopia
title_fullStr Quality of the delivery services in health facilities in Northern Ethiopia
title_full_unstemmed Quality of the delivery services in health facilities in Northern Ethiopia
title_short Quality of the delivery services in health facilities in Northern Ethiopia
title_sort quality of the delivery services in health facilities in northern ethiopia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5345168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28279215
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2125-3
work_keys_str_mv AT fissehagirmatsion qualityofthedeliveryservicesinhealthfacilitiesinnorthernethiopia
AT berhaneyemane qualityofthedeliveryservicesinhealthfacilitiesinnorthernethiopia
AT workualemayehu qualityofthedeliveryservicesinhealthfacilitiesinnorthernethiopia
AT terefewondwossen qualityofthedeliveryservicesinhealthfacilitiesinnorthernethiopia