Cargando…

RNA extraction method is crucial for human papillomavirus E6/E7 oncogenes detection

BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing plays a main role in the management of cervical cancer, however to improve the specificity in cervical screening, there is a need to develop and validate different approaches that can identify women at risk for progressive disease. Nowadays, mRNA ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fontecha, Nerea, Nieto, Maria Carmen, Andía, Daniel, Cisterna, Ramón, Basaras, Miren
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5345170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28279212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12985-017-0720-x
_version_ 1782513665285554176
author Fontecha, Nerea
Nieto, Maria Carmen
Andía, Daniel
Cisterna, Ramón
Basaras, Miren
author_facet Fontecha, Nerea
Nieto, Maria Carmen
Andía, Daniel
Cisterna, Ramón
Basaras, Miren
author_sort Fontecha, Nerea
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing plays a main role in the management of cervical cancer, however to improve the specificity in cervical screening, there is a need to develop and validate different approaches that can identify women at risk for progressive disease. Nowadays, mRNA expression of viral E6 and E7 HPV oncogenes stands up as a potential biomarker to improve cervical screening. We aimed to validate a method for RNA extraction, detect HPV mRNA expression and, assess the relationship between E6/E7 mRNA expression and pathology of patients’ lesions and progression. METHODS: This study included 50 specimens that had been previously genotyped as HPV16, 18, 31, 33 and/or 45. Cervical swabs were extracted with three different RNA extraction methods -Nuclisens manual extraction kit (bioMérieux), High Pure Viral RNA Kit (Roche) and RNeasy Plus Mini kit (Qiagen)-, and mRNA was detected with NucliSens EasyQ HPV version 1 test (bioMérieux) afterwards. Association of oncogene expression with pathology and lesion progression was analyzed for each extraction method. RESULTS: E6/E7 mRNA positivity rate was higher in samples analyzed with bioMérieux (62%), followed by Roche (24%) and Qiagen (6%). Women with lesions and lesion progression showed a higher prevalence of viral RNA expression than women that had not lesions or with lesion persistence. While bioMérieux revealed a higher sensitivity (77.27%), Roche presented a higher PPV (75%) and an increased specificity (89.28%). CONCLUSIONS: Extraction methods based on magnetic beads provided better RNA yield than those based in columns. Both Nuclisens manual extraction kit (bioMérieux) and High Pure Viral RNA Kit (Roche) seemed to be adequate for E6/E7 mRNA detection. However, none of them revealed both high sensitivity and specificity values. Further studies are needed to obtain and validate a standard gold method for RNA expression detection, to be included as part of the routine cervical screening program.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5345170
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53451702017-03-14 RNA extraction method is crucial for human papillomavirus E6/E7 oncogenes detection Fontecha, Nerea Nieto, Maria Carmen Andía, Daniel Cisterna, Ramón Basaras, Miren Virol J Research BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing plays a main role in the management of cervical cancer, however to improve the specificity in cervical screening, there is a need to develop and validate different approaches that can identify women at risk for progressive disease. Nowadays, mRNA expression of viral E6 and E7 HPV oncogenes stands up as a potential biomarker to improve cervical screening. We aimed to validate a method for RNA extraction, detect HPV mRNA expression and, assess the relationship between E6/E7 mRNA expression and pathology of patients’ lesions and progression. METHODS: This study included 50 specimens that had been previously genotyped as HPV16, 18, 31, 33 and/or 45. Cervical swabs were extracted with three different RNA extraction methods -Nuclisens manual extraction kit (bioMérieux), High Pure Viral RNA Kit (Roche) and RNeasy Plus Mini kit (Qiagen)-, and mRNA was detected with NucliSens EasyQ HPV version 1 test (bioMérieux) afterwards. Association of oncogene expression with pathology and lesion progression was analyzed for each extraction method. RESULTS: E6/E7 mRNA positivity rate was higher in samples analyzed with bioMérieux (62%), followed by Roche (24%) and Qiagen (6%). Women with lesions and lesion progression showed a higher prevalence of viral RNA expression than women that had not lesions or with lesion persistence. While bioMérieux revealed a higher sensitivity (77.27%), Roche presented a higher PPV (75%) and an increased specificity (89.28%). CONCLUSIONS: Extraction methods based on magnetic beads provided better RNA yield than those based in columns. Both Nuclisens manual extraction kit (bioMérieux) and High Pure Viral RNA Kit (Roche) seemed to be adequate for E6/E7 mRNA detection. However, none of them revealed both high sensitivity and specificity values. Further studies are needed to obtain and validate a standard gold method for RNA expression detection, to be included as part of the routine cervical screening program. BioMed Central 2017-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5345170/ /pubmed/28279212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12985-017-0720-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Fontecha, Nerea
Nieto, Maria Carmen
Andía, Daniel
Cisterna, Ramón
Basaras, Miren
RNA extraction method is crucial for human papillomavirus E6/E7 oncogenes detection
title RNA extraction method is crucial for human papillomavirus E6/E7 oncogenes detection
title_full RNA extraction method is crucial for human papillomavirus E6/E7 oncogenes detection
title_fullStr RNA extraction method is crucial for human papillomavirus E6/E7 oncogenes detection
title_full_unstemmed RNA extraction method is crucial for human papillomavirus E6/E7 oncogenes detection
title_short RNA extraction method is crucial for human papillomavirus E6/E7 oncogenes detection
title_sort rna extraction method is crucial for human papillomavirus e6/e7 oncogenes detection
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5345170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28279212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12985-017-0720-x
work_keys_str_mv AT fontechanerea rnaextractionmethodiscrucialforhumanpapillomaviruse6e7oncogenesdetection
AT nietomariacarmen rnaextractionmethodiscrucialforhumanpapillomaviruse6e7oncogenesdetection
AT andiadaniel rnaextractionmethodiscrucialforhumanpapillomaviruse6e7oncogenesdetection
AT cisternaramon rnaextractionmethodiscrucialforhumanpapillomaviruse6e7oncogenesdetection
AT basarasmiren rnaextractionmethodiscrucialforhumanpapillomaviruse6e7oncogenesdetection