Cargando…
The resonance® metallic ureteric stent in the treatment of chronic ureteric obstruction: a safety and efficacy analysis from a contemporary clinical series
BACKGROUND: We evaluate the efficacy and safety of metallic ureteric stenting using the Cook Resonance® stent in the treatment of chronic ureteric obstruction of benign and malignant aetiology. Published experience of using this stent in this context is limited. We add to the body of literature on t...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5345181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28283031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-017-0204-8 |
_version_ | 1782513667822059520 |
---|---|
author | Patel, C. Loughran, D. Jones, R. Abdulmajed, M. Shergill, I. |
author_facet | Patel, C. Loughran, D. Jones, R. Abdulmajed, M. Shergill, I. |
author_sort | Patel, C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We evaluate the efficacy and safety of metallic ureteric stenting using the Cook Resonance® stent in the treatment of chronic ureteric obstruction of benign and malignant aetiology. Published experience of using this stent in this context is limited. We add to the body of literature on this topic. METHODS: All patients who had a Resonance® metallic stent inserted between April 2009 and November 2014 in our institution were identified from a prospectively maintained stent-database. Primary outcome was relief of ureteric obstruction, defined by successful clinical and radiological treatment of hydronephrosis/hydroureter. Secondary outcome measures included operative time, radiological exposure, total stent dwell time (defined as the cumulative time in months for which a Resonance® metallic stent was in situ), and early and late complications. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients underwent 52 stent insertion episodes (SIE). Median age was 58 years (range 39–90). Stent insertion resulted in successful treatment of hydronephrosis/hydroureter in 96% (2 SIE resulted in failure to relieve ureteric obstruction). Median operative time was 21 min (range 12–90) Median radiation exposure was 815.3 cGy/cm2 (range 192.9–5366.3). Median stent dwell time was 19.5 months (range 6–52) in non-malignant and 12 months (range 2–48) in malignant ureteric obstruction. One stent migrated proximally during insertion and had to be retrieved using an antegrade approach. 5 patients re-admitted with haematuria: all resolved without intervention or blood transfusion. 3 episodes of post-operative urinary infection were recorded; all were successfully treated with oral antibiotics. CONCLUSION: Metallic ureteric stenting using the Resonance® stent is safe and effective for treating ureteric obstruction from both malignant and benign causes. The success rate in our series is 96%. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5345181 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53451812017-03-14 The resonance® metallic ureteric stent in the treatment of chronic ureteric obstruction: a safety and efficacy analysis from a contemporary clinical series Patel, C. Loughran, D. Jones, R. Abdulmajed, M. Shergill, I. BMC Urol Research Article BACKGROUND: We evaluate the efficacy and safety of metallic ureteric stenting using the Cook Resonance® stent in the treatment of chronic ureteric obstruction of benign and malignant aetiology. Published experience of using this stent in this context is limited. We add to the body of literature on this topic. METHODS: All patients who had a Resonance® metallic stent inserted between April 2009 and November 2014 in our institution were identified from a prospectively maintained stent-database. Primary outcome was relief of ureteric obstruction, defined by successful clinical and radiological treatment of hydronephrosis/hydroureter. Secondary outcome measures included operative time, radiological exposure, total stent dwell time (defined as the cumulative time in months for which a Resonance® metallic stent was in situ), and early and late complications. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients underwent 52 stent insertion episodes (SIE). Median age was 58 years (range 39–90). Stent insertion resulted in successful treatment of hydronephrosis/hydroureter in 96% (2 SIE resulted in failure to relieve ureteric obstruction). Median operative time was 21 min (range 12–90) Median radiation exposure was 815.3 cGy/cm2 (range 192.9–5366.3). Median stent dwell time was 19.5 months (range 6–52) in non-malignant and 12 months (range 2–48) in malignant ureteric obstruction. One stent migrated proximally during insertion and had to be retrieved using an antegrade approach. 5 patients re-admitted with haematuria: all resolved without intervention or blood transfusion. 3 episodes of post-operative urinary infection were recorded; all were successfully treated with oral antibiotics. CONCLUSION: Metallic ureteric stenting using the Resonance® stent is safe and effective for treating ureteric obstruction from both malignant and benign causes. The success rate in our series is 96%. BioMed Central 2017-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5345181/ /pubmed/28283031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-017-0204-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Patel, C. Loughran, D. Jones, R. Abdulmajed, M. Shergill, I. The resonance® metallic ureteric stent in the treatment of chronic ureteric obstruction: a safety and efficacy analysis from a contemporary clinical series |
title | The resonance® metallic ureteric stent in the treatment of chronic ureteric obstruction: a safety and efficacy analysis from a contemporary clinical series |
title_full | The resonance® metallic ureteric stent in the treatment of chronic ureteric obstruction: a safety and efficacy analysis from a contemporary clinical series |
title_fullStr | The resonance® metallic ureteric stent in the treatment of chronic ureteric obstruction: a safety and efficacy analysis from a contemporary clinical series |
title_full_unstemmed | The resonance® metallic ureteric stent in the treatment of chronic ureteric obstruction: a safety and efficacy analysis from a contemporary clinical series |
title_short | The resonance® metallic ureteric stent in the treatment of chronic ureteric obstruction: a safety and efficacy analysis from a contemporary clinical series |
title_sort | resonance® metallic ureteric stent in the treatment of chronic ureteric obstruction: a safety and efficacy analysis from a contemporary clinical series |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5345181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28283031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-017-0204-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT patelc theresonancemetallicuretericstentinthetreatmentofchronicuretericobstructionasafetyandefficacyanalysisfromacontemporaryclinicalseries AT loughrand theresonancemetallicuretericstentinthetreatmentofchronicuretericobstructionasafetyandefficacyanalysisfromacontemporaryclinicalseries AT jonesr theresonancemetallicuretericstentinthetreatmentofchronicuretericobstructionasafetyandefficacyanalysisfromacontemporaryclinicalseries AT abdulmajedm theresonancemetallicuretericstentinthetreatmentofchronicuretericobstructionasafetyandefficacyanalysisfromacontemporaryclinicalseries AT shergilli theresonancemetallicuretericstentinthetreatmentofchronicuretericobstructionasafetyandefficacyanalysisfromacontemporaryclinicalseries AT patelc resonancemetallicuretericstentinthetreatmentofchronicuretericobstructionasafetyandefficacyanalysisfromacontemporaryclinicalseries AT loughrand resonancemetallicuretericstentinthetreatmentofchronicuretericobstructionasafetyandefficacyanalysisfromacontemporaryclinicalseries AT jonesr resonancemetallicuretericstentinthetreatmentofchronicuretericobstructionasafetyandefficacyanalysisfromacontemporaryclinicalseries AT abdulmajedm resonancemetallicuretericstentinthetreatmentofchronicuretericobstructionasafetyandefficacyanalysisfromacontemporaryclinicalseries AT shergilli resonancemetallicuretericstentinthetreatmentofchronicuretericobstructionasafetyandefficacyanalysisfromacontemporaryclinicalseries |