Cargando…
Using Getting To Outcomes to facilitate the use of an evidence-based practice in VA homeless programs: a cluster-randomized trial of an implementation support strategy
BACKGROUND: Incorporating evidence-based integrated treatment for dual disorders into typical care settings has been challenging, especially among those serving Veterans who are homeless. This paper presents an evaluation of an effort to incorporate an evidence-based, dual disorder treatment called...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5345223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28279207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0565-0 |
_version_ | 1782513673647947776 |
---|---|
author | Chinman, Matthew McCarthy, Sharon Hannah, Gordon Byrne, Thomas Hugh Smelson, David A. |
author_facet | Chinman, Matthew McCarthy, Sharon Hannah, Gordon Byrne, Thomas Hugh Smelson, David A. |
author_sort | Chinman, Matthew |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Incorporating evidence-based integrated treatment for dual disorders into typical care settings has been challenging, especially among those serving Veterans who are homeless. This paper presents an evaluation of an effort to incorporate an evidence-based, dual disorder treatment called Maintaining Independence and Sobriety Through Systems Integration, Outreach, and Networking—Veterans Edition (MISSION-Vet) into case management teams serving Veterans who are homeless, using an implementation strategy called Getting To Outcomes (GTO). METHODS: This Hybrid Type III, cluster-randomized controlled trial assessed the impact of GTO over and above MISSION-Vet Implementation as Usual (IU). Both conditions received standard MISSION-Vet training and manuals. The GTO group received an implementation manual, training, technical assistance, and data feedback. The study occurred in teams at three large VA Medical Centers over 2 years. Within each team, existing sub-teams (case managers and Veterans they serve) were the clusters randomly assigned. The trial assessed MISSION-Vet services delivered and collected via administrative data and implementation barriers and facilitators, via semi-structured interview. RESULTS: No case managers in the IU group initiated MISSION-Vet while 68% in the GTO group did. Seven percent of Veterans with case managers in the GTO group received at least one MISSION-Vet session. Most case managers appreciated the MISSION-Vet materials and felt the GTO planning meetings supported using MISSION-Vet. Case manager interviews also showed that MISSION-Vet could be confusing; there was little involvement from leadership after their initial agreement to participate; the data feedback system had a number of difficulties; and case managers did not have the resources to implement all aspects of MISSION-Vet. CONCLUSIONS: This project shows that GTO-like support can help launch new practices but that multiple implementation facilitators are needed for successful execution of a complex evidence-based program like MISSION-Vet. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01430741 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5345223 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53452232017-03-14 Using Getting To Outcomes to facilitate the use of an evidence-based practice in VA homeless programs: a cluster-randomized trial of an implementation support strategy Chinman, Matthew McCarthy, Sharon Hannah, Gordon Byrne, Thomas Hugh Smelson, David A. Implement Sci Research BACKGROUND: Incorporating evidence-based integrated treatment for dual disorders into typical care settings has been challenging, especially among those serving Veterans who are homeless. This paper presents an evaluation of an effort to incorporate an evidence-based, dual disorder treatment called Maintaining Independence and Sobriety Through Systems Integration, Outreach, and Networking—Veterans Edition (MISSION-Vet) into case management teams serving Veterans who are homeless, using an implementation strategy called Getting To Outcomes (GTO). METHODS: This Hybrid Type III, cluster-randomized controlled trial assessed the impact of GTO over and above MISSION-Vet Implementation as Usual (IU). Both conditions received standard MISSION-Vet training and manuals. The GTO group received an implementation manual, training, technical assistance, and data feedback. The study occurred in teams at three large VA Medical Centers over 2 years. Within each team, existing sub-teams (case managers and Veterans they serve) were the clusters randomly assigned. The trial assessed MISSION-Vet services delivered and collected via administrative data and implementation barriers and facilitators, via semi-structured interview. RESULTS: No case managers in the IU group initiated MISSION-Vet while 68% in the GTO group did. Seven percent of Veterans with case managers in the GTO group received at least one MISSION-Vet session. Most case managers appreciated the MISSION-Vet materials and felt the GTO planning meetings supported using MISSION-Vet. Case manager interviews also showed that MISSION-Vet could be confusing; there was little involvement from leadership after their initial agreement to participate; the data feedback system had a number of difficulties; and case managers did not have the resources to implement all aspects of MISSION-Vet. CONCLUSIONS: This project shows that GTO-like support can help launch new practices but that multiple implementation facilitators are needed for successful execution of a complex evidence-based program like MISSION-Vet. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01430741 BioMed Central 2017-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5345223/ /pubmed/28279207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0565-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Chinman, Matthew McCarthy, Sharon Hannah, Gordon Byrne, Thomas Hugh Smelson, David A. Using Getting To Outcomes to facilitate the use of an evidence-based practice in VA homeless programs: a cluster-randomized trial of an implementation support strategy |
title | Using Getting To Outcomes to facilitate the use of an evidence-based practice in VA homeless programs: a cluster-randomized trial of an implementation support strategy |
title_full | Using Getting To Outcomes to facilitate the use of an evidence-based practice in VA homeless programs: a cluster-randomized trial of an implementation support strategy |
title_fullStr | Using Getting To Outcomes to facilitate the use of an evidence-based practice in VA homeless programs: a cluster-randomized trial of an implementation support strategy |
title_full_unstemmed | Using Getting To Outcomes to facilitate the use of an evidence-based practice in VA homeless programs: a cluster-randomized trial of an implementation support strategy |
title_short | Using Getting To Outcomes to facilitate the use of an evidence-based practice in VA homeless programs: a cluster-randomized trial of an implementation support strategy |
title_sort | using getting to outcomes to facilitate the use of an evidence-based practice in va homeless programs: a cluster-randomized trial of an implementation support strategy |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5345223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28279207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0565-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chinmanmatthew usinggettingtooutcomestofacilitatetheuseofanevidencebasedpracticeinvahomelessprogramsaclusterrandomizedtrialofanimplementationsupportstrategy AT mccarthysharon usinggettingtooutcomestofacilitatetheuseofanevidencebasedpracticeinvahomelessprogramsaclusterrandomizedtrialofanimplementationsupportstrategy AT hannahgordon usinggettingtooutcomestofacilitatetheuseofanevidencebasedpracticeinvahomelessprogramsaclusterrandomizedtrialofanimplementationsupportstrategy AT byrnethomashugh usinggettingtooutcomestofacilitatetheuseofanevidencebasedpracticeinvahomelessprogramsaclusterrandomizedtrialofanimplementationsupportstrategy AT smelsondavida usinggettingtooutcomestofacilitatetheuseofanevidencebasedpracticeinvahomelessprogramsaclusterrandomizedtrialofanimplementationsupportstrategy |