Cargando…
Delta check for blood groups: A step ahead in blood safety
BACKGROUND: Blood grouping is the single most important test performed by each and every transfusion service. A blood group error has a potential for causing severe life-threatening complications. A number of process strategies have been adopted at various institutions to prevent the occurrence of e...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5345275/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28316435 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-6247.200783 |
_version_ | 1782513683806552064 |
---|---|
author | Makroo, Raj Nath Bhatia, Aakanksha |
author_facet | Makroo, Raj Nath Bhatia, Aakanksha |
author_sort | Makroo, Raj Nath |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Blood grouping is the single most important test performed by each and every transfusion service. A blood group error has a potential for causing severe life-threatening complications. A number of process strategies have been adopted at various institutions to prevent the occurrence of errors at the time of phlebotomy, pretransfusion testing, and blood administration. A delta check is one such quality control tool that involves the comparison of laboratory test results with results obtained on previous samples from the same patient. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrieved the records of all transfusion-related incidents reported in our institute, between January 2008 and December 2014. Errors identified as “Failed Delta checks” and their root cause analyses (RCA) were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 17,034 errors related to blood transfusion were reported. Of these, 38 were blood grouping errors. Seventeen blood group errors were identified due to failed delta checks, where the results of two individually drawn grouping samples yielded different blood group results. The RCA revealed that all of these errors occurred in the preanalytical phase of testing. Mislabeling resulting in wrong blood in tube was the most commonly identified cause, accounting for 11 of these errors, while problems with correct patient identification accounted for 5 failed delta checks. CONCLUSION: Delta checks proved to be an effective tool for detecting blood group errors and prevention of accidental mismatched blood transfusions. Preanalytical errors in patient identification or sample labeling were the most frequent. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5345275 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53452752017-03-17 Delta check for blood groups: A step ahead in blood safety Makroo, Raj Nath Bhatia, Aakanksha Asian J Transfus Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Blood grouping is the single most important test performed by each and every transfusion service. A blood group error has a potential for causing severe life-threatening complications. A number of process strategies have been adopted at various institutions to prevent the occurrence of errors at the time of phlebotomy, pretransfusion testing, and blood administration. A delta check is one such quality control tool that involves the comparison of laboratory test results with results obtained on previous samples from the same patient. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrieved the records of all transfusion-related incidents reported in our institute, between January 2008 and December 2014. Errors identified as “Failed Delta checks” and their root cause analyses (RCA) were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 17,034 errors related to blood transfusion were reported. Of these, 38 were blood grouping errors. Seventeen blood group errors were identified due to failed delta checks, where the results of two individually drawn grouping samples yielded different blood group results. The RCA revealed that all of these errors occurred in the preanalytical phase of testing. Mislabeling resulting in wrong blood in tube was the most commonly identified cause, accounting for 11 of these errors, while problems with correct patient identification accounted for 5 failed delta checks. CONCLUSION: Delta checks proved to be an effective tool for detecting blood group errors and prevention of accidental mismatched blood transfusions. Preanalytical errors in patient identification or sample labeling were the most frequent. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5345275/ /pubmed/28316435 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-6247.200783 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Asian Journal of Transfusion Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Makroo, Raj Nath Bhatia, Aakanksha Delta check for blood groups: A step ahead in blood safety |
title | Delta check for blood groups: A step ahead in blood safety |
title_full | Delta check for blood groups: A step ahead in blood safety |
title_fullStr | Delta check for blood groups: A step ahead in blood safety |
title_full_unstemmed | Delta check for blood groups: A step ahead in blood safety |
title_short | Delta check for blood groups: A step ahead in blood safety |
title_sort | delta check for blood groups: a step ahead in blood safety |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5345275/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28316435 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-6247.200783 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT makroorajnath deltacheckforbloodgroupsastepaheadinbloodsafety AT bhatiaaakanksha deltacheckforbloodgroupsastepaheadinbloodsafety |