A cost-effective anaerobic culture method & its comparison with a standard method

Twenty six anaerobes were recovered from 150 deep-seated abscess samples cultured by the proposed two-step combustion-modified candle-jar system and Anoxomat. The degree of growth and colony size were similar in both systems, except for Clostridium difficile. The modified candle-jar system was found...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saha, Uma Shankar, Misra, Richa, Tiwari, Dinesh, Prasad, Kashi Nath
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Original Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5345310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28256472
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-5916.200881
_version_ 1782513692069330944
author Saha, Uma Shankar
Misra, Richa
Tiwari, Dinesh
Prasad, Kashi Nath
author_facet Saha, Uma Shankar
Misra, Richa
Tiwari, Dinesh
Prasad, Kashi Nath
author_sort Saha, Uma Shankar
collection PubMed
description Twenty six anaerobes were recovered from 150 deep-seated abscess samples cultured by the proposed two-step combustion-modified candle-jar system and Anoxomat. The degree of growth and colony size were similar in both systems, except for Clostridium difficile. The modified candle-jar system was found to be a sensitive and cost-effective alternative that might be used in resource-limited settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5345310
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53453102017-03-17 A cost-effective anaerobic culture method & its comparison with a standard method Saha, Uma Shankar Misra, Richa Tiwari, Dinesh Prasad, Kashi Nath Indian J Med Res Original Article Twenty six anaerobes were recovered from 150 deep-seated abscess samples cultured by the proposed two-step combustion-modified candle-jar system and Anoxomat. The degree of growth and colony size were similar in both systems, except for Clostridium difficile. The modified candle-jar system was found to be a sensitive and cost-effective alternative that might be used in resource-limited settings. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5345310/ /pubmed/28256472 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-5916.200881 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Indian Journal of Medical Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Saha, Uma Shankar
Misra, Richa
Tiwari, Dinesh
Prasad, Kashi Nath
A cost-effective anaerobic culture method & its comparison with a standard method
title A cost-effective anaerobic culture method & its comparison with a standard method
title_full A cost-effective anaerobic culture method & its comparison with a standard method
title_fullStr A cost-effective anaerobic culture method & its comparison with a standard method
title_full_unstemmed A cost-effective anaerobic culture method & its comparison with a standard method
title_short A cost-effective anaerobic culture method & its comparison with a standard method
title_sort cost-effective anaerobic culture method & its comparison with a standard method
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5345310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28256472
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-5916.200881
work_keys_str_mv AT sahaumashankar acosteffectiveanaerobicculturemethoditscomparisonwithastandardmethod
AT misraricha acosteffectiveanaerobicculturemethoditscomparisonwithastandardmethod
AT tiwaridinesh acosteffectiveanaerobicculturemethoditscomparisonwithastandardmethod
AT prasadkashinath acosteffectiveanaerobicculturemethoditscomparisonwithastandardmethod
AT sahaumashankar costeffectiveanaerobicculturemethoditscomparisonwithastandardmethod
AT misraricha costeffectiveanaerobicculturemethoditscomparisonwithastandardmethod
AT tiwaridinesh costeffectiveanaerobicculturemethoditscomparisonwithastandardmethod
AT prasadkashinath costeffectiveanaerobicculturemethoditscomparisonwithastandardmethod

Ejemplares similares