Cargando…

SafetyNet: streamlining and automating QA in radiotherapy

Proper quality assurance (QA) of the radiotherapy process can be time‐consuming and expensive. Many QA efforts, such as data export and import, are inefficient when done by humans. Additionally, humans can be unreliable, lose attention, and fail to complete critical steps that are required for smoot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hadley, Scott W., Kessler, Marc L., Litzenberg, Dale W., Lee, Choonik, Irrer, Jim, Chen, Xiaoping, Acosta, Eduardo, Weyburne, Grant, Keranen, Wayne, Lam, Kwok, Covington, Elizabeth, Younge, Kelly C., Matuszak, Martha M., Moran, Jean M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5345488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26894365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i1.5920
_version_ 1782513731270344704
author Hadley, Scott W.
Kessler, Marc L.
Litzenberg, Dale W.
Lee, Choonik
Irrer, Jim
Chen, Xiaoping
Acosta, Eduardo
Weyburne, Grant
Keranen, Wayne
Lam, Kwok
Covington, Elizabeth
Younge, Kelly C.
Matuszak, Martha M.
Moran, Jean M.
author_facet Hadley, Scott W.
Kessler, Marc L.
Litzenberg, Dale W.
Lee, Choonik
Irrer, Jim
Chen, Xiaoping
Acosta, Eduardo
Weyburne, Grant
Keranen, Wayne
Lam, Kwok
Covington, Elizabeth
Younge, Kelly C.
Matuszak, Martha M.
Moran, Jean M.
author_sort Hadley, Scott W.
collection PubMed
description Proper quality assurance (QA) of the radiotherapy process can be time‐consuming and expensive. Many QA efforts, such as data export and import, are inefficient when done by humans. Additionally, humans can be unreliable, lose attention, and fail to complete critical steps that are required for smooth operations. In our group we have sought to break down the QA tasks into separate steps and to automate those steps that are better done by software running autonomously or at the instigation of a human. A team of medical physicists and software engineers worked together to identify opportunities to streamline and automate QA. Development efforts follow a formal cycle of writing software requirements, developing software, testing and commissioning. The clinical release process is separated into clinical evaluation testing, training, and finally clinical release. We have improved six processes related to QA and safety. Steps that were previously performed by humans have been automated or streamlined to increase first‐time quality, reduce time spent by humans doing low‐level tasks, and expedite QA tests. Much of the gains were had by automating data transfer, implementing computer‐based checking and automation of systems with an event‐driven framework. These coordinated efforts by software engineers and clinical physicists have resulted in speed improvements in expediting patient‐sensitive QA tests. PACS number(s): 87.55.Ne, 87.55.Qr, 87.55.tg, 87.55.tm
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5345488
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53454882017-03-10 SafetyNet: streamlining and automating QA in radiotherapy Hadley, Scott W. Kessler, Marc L. Litzenberg, Dale W. Lee, Choonik Irrer, Jim Chen, Xiaoping Acosta, Eduardo Weyburne, Grant Keranen, Wayne Lam, Kwok Covington, Elizabeth Younge, Kelly C. Matuszak, Martha M. Moran, Jean M. J Appl Clin Med Phys Management and Profession Proper quality assurance (QA) of the radiotherapy process can be time‐consuming and expensive. Many QA efforts, such as data export and import, are inefficient when done by humans. Additionally, humans can be unreliable, lose attention, and fail to complete critical steps that are required for smooth operations. In our group we have sought to break down the QA tasks into separate steps and to automate those steps that are better done by software running autonomously or at the instigation of a human. A team of medical physicists and software engineers worked together to identify opportunities to streamline and automate QA. Development efforts follow a formal cycle of writing software requirements, developing software, testing and commissioning. The clinical release process is separated into clinical evaluation testing, training, and finally clinical release. We have improved six processes related to QA and safety. Steps that were previously performed by humans have been automated or streamlined to increase first‐time quality, reduce time spent by humans doing low‐level tasks, and expedite QA tests. Much of the gains were had by automating data transfer, implementing computer‐based checking and automation of systems with an event‐driven framework. These coordinated efforts by software engineers and clinical physicists have resulted in speed improvements in expediting patient‐sensitive QA tests. PACS number(s): 87.55.Ne, 87.55.Qr, 87.55.tg, 87.55.tm John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5345488/ /pubmed/26894365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i1.5920 Text en © 2016 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Management and Profession
Hadley, Scott W.
Kessler, Marc L.
Litzenberg, Dale W.
Lee, Choonik
Irrer, Jim
Chen, Xiaoping
Acosta, Eduardo
Weyburne, Grant
Keranen, Wayne
Lam, Kwok
Covington, Elizabeth
Younge, Kelly C.
Matuszak, Martha M.
Moran, Jean M.
SafetyNet: streamlining and automating QA in radiotherapy
title SafetyNet: streamlining and automating QA in radiotherapy
title_full SafetyNet: streamlining and automating QA in radiotherapy
title_fullStr SafetyNet: streamlining and automating QA in radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed SafetyNet: streamlining and automating QA in radiotherapy
title_short SafetyNet: streamlining and automating QA in radiotherapy
title_sort safetynet: streamlining and automating qa in radiotherapy
topic Management and Profession
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5345488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26894365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i1.5920
work_keys_str_mv AT hadleyscottw safetynetstreamliningandautomatingqainradiotherapy
AT kesslermarcl safetynetstreamliningandautomatingqainradiotherapy
AT litzenbergdalew safetynetstreamliningandautomatingqainradiotherapy
AT leechoonik safetynetstreamliningandautomatingqainradiotherapy
AT irrerjim safetynetstreamliningandautomatingqainradiotherapy
AT chenxiaoping safetynetstreamliningandautomatingqainradiotherapy
AT acostaeduardo safetynetstreamliningandautomatingqainradiotherapy
AT weyburnegrant safetynetstreamliningandautomatingqainradiotherapy
AT keranenwayne safetynetstreamliningandautomatingqainradiotherapy
AT lamkwok safetynetstreamliningandautomatingqainradiotherapy
AT covingtonelizabeth safetynetstreamliningandautomatingqainradiotherapy
AT youngekellyc safetynetstreamliningandautomatingqainradiotherapy
AT matuszakmartham safetynetstreamliningandautomatingqainradiotherapy
AT moranjeanm safetynetstreamliningandautomatingqainradiotherapy