Cargando…

Preliminary findings on the correlation of saliva pH, buffering capacity, flow rate and consistency in relation to waterpipe tobacco smoking

The aim of the present comparative study was to compare some salivary characteristics between exclusive waterpipe smokers (EWPS) and non-smokers. 72 males (36 EWPS) were recruited. The volume of stimulated saliva was determined and divided by the duration of saliva collection. The pH was measured di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khemiss, Mehdi, Ben Khelifa, Mohamed, Ben Saad, Helmi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5345591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28266252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19932820.2017.1289651
_version_ 1782513748897955840
author Khemiss, Mehdi
Ben Khelifa, Mohamed
Ben Saad, Helmi
author_facet Khemiss, Mehdi
Ben Khelifa, Mohamed
Ben Saad, Helmi
author_sort Khemiss, Mehdi
collection PubMed
description The aim of the present comparative study was to compare some salivary characteristics between exclusive waterpipe smokers (EWPS) and non-smokers. 72 males (36 EWPS) were recruited. The volume of stimulated saliva was determined and divided by the duration of saliva collection. The pH was measured directly using a pH meter. The buffering capacity was determined using a quantitative method which involved the addition of 10 µl HCl. Up to a total of 160 µL was titrated up to obtain a pH titration curve. At 50 µL of titrated HCl, buffering capacity was ranked into three categories: high, medium and low. EWPS and non-smoker groups had similar flow rates (1.81 ± 0.79 and 1.78 ± 1.14 mL min-1) and similar baseline pH (6.60 ± 0.37 and 6.76 ± 0.39). Statistically significant differences in the two groups’ pH were observed from 30 to 160 µL of titrated up HCl. At 50 µL of titrated up HCl, the EWPS group compared to the non-smoker group had a significantly higher pH (4.79 ± 0.72 vs. 5.32 ± 0.79). To conclude, waterpipe tobacco smoking alters the buffering capacity but does not alter either salivary flow rates or the baseline pH and consistency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5345591
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53455912017-03-20 Preliminary findings on the correlation of saliva pH, buffering capacity, flow rate and consistency in relation to waterpipe tobacco smoking Khemiss, Mehdi Ben Khelifa, Mohamed Ben Saad, Helmi Libyan J Med Original Articles The aim of the present comparative study was to compare some salivary characteristics between exclusive waterpipe smokers (EWPS) and non-smokers. 72 males (36 EWPS) were recruited. The volume of stimulated saliva was determined and divided by the duration of saliva collection. The pH was measured directly using a pH meter. The buffering capacity was determined using a quantitative method which involved the addition of 10 µl HCl. Up to a total of 160 µL was titrated up to obtain a pH titration curve. At 50 µL of titrated HCl, buffering capacity was ranked into three categories: high, medium and low. EWPS and non-smoker groups had similar flow rates (1.81 ± 0.79 and 1.78 ± 1.14 mL min-1) and similar baseline pH (6.60 ± 0.37 and 6.76 ± 0.39). Statistically significant differences in the two groups’ pH were observed from 30 to 160 µL of titrated up HCl. At 50 µL of titrated up HCl, the EWPS group compared to the non-smoker group had a significantly higher pH (4.79 ± 0.72 vs. 5.32 ± 0.79). To conclude, waterpipe tobacco smoking alters the buffering capacity but does not alter either salivary flow rates or the baseline pH and consistency. Taylor & Francis 2017-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5345591/ /pubmed/28266252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19932820.2017.1289651 Text en © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Khemiss, Mehdi
Ben Khelifa, Mohamed
Ben Saad, Helmi
Preliminary findings on the correlation of saliva pH, buffering capacity, flow rate and consistency in relation to waterpipe tobacco smoking
title Preliminary findings on the correlation of saliva pH, buffering capacity, flow rate and consistency in relation to waterpipe tobacco smoking
title_full Preliminary findings on the correlation of saliva pH, buffering capacity, flow rate and consistency in relation to waterpipe tobacco smoking
title_fullStr Preliminary findings on the correlation of saliva pH, buffering capacity, flow rate and consistency in relation to waterpipe tobacco smoking
title_full_unstemmed Preliminary findings on the correlation of saliva pH, buffering capacity, flow rate and consistency in relation to waterpipe tobacco smoking
title_short Preliminary findings on the correlation of saliva pH, buffering capacity, flow rate and consistency in relation to waterpipe tobacco smoking
title_sort preliminary findings on the correlation of saliva ph, buffering capacity, flow rate and consistency in relation to waterpipe tobacco smoking
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5345591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28266252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19932820.2017.1289651
work_keys_str_mv AT khemissmehdi preliminaryfindingsonthecorrelationofsalivaphbufferingcapacityflowrateandconsistencyinrelationtowaterpipetobaccosmoking
AT benkhelifamohamed preliminaryfindingsonthecorrelationofsalivaphbufferingcapacityflowrateandconsistencyinrelationtowaterpipetobaccosmoking
AT bensaadhelmi preliminaryfindingsonthecorrelationofsalivaphbufferingcapacityflowrateandconsistencyinrelationtowaterpipetobaccosmoking