Cargando…

Low utility of Oncotype DX® in the clinic

Precision medicine tools are currently making their way into the clinic and being utilized to diagnose, prognose, and individualize cancer care. The multi‐gene expression‐based assay, Oncotype DX® (ODX), is a genomic tumor profiling tool that determines the expression of 21 tumor‐ associated genes;...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ricks‐Santi, Luisel J., McDonald, John Tyson
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5345634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28145091
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.837
_version_ 1782513754302316544
author Ricks‐Santi, Luisel J.
McDonald, John Tyson
author_facet Ricks‐Santi, Luisel J.
McDonald, John Tyson
author_sort Ricks‐Santi, Luisel J.
collection PubMed
description Precision medicine tools are currently making their way into the clinic and being utilized to diagnose, prognose, and individualize cancer care. The multi‐gene expression‐based assay, Oncotype DX® (ODX), is a genomic tumor profiling tool that determines the expression of 21 tumor‐ associated genes; it helps determine the risk for distant recurrence and whether chemotherapy is an appropriate course of treatment in patients with early stage, estrogen receptor (ER) positive, HER2 negative, and lymph node negative (or 1–3 positive lymph nodes) invasive BCa. The aim of this study was to determine the overall utilization and uptake of the ODX genomic test in a cross‐sectional analysis of the Virginia Tumor registry, compare utilization in African Americans (AAs) and Caucasian Americans (CAs), and determine the profile of patients referred for testing. Caucasian (89.7%) patients made up the majority of the ODX testers compared to AAs (10.3%) (P < 0.0001). Those who received ODX testing were less likely to have higher grade and higher stage tumors, and were less likely to be ER negative (RR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.01–0.31), progesterone receptor (PR) negative (RR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.27–0.45), HER2 amplified (RR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.17–0.43), or triple negative (RR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.14–0.33). Of the patients that were eligible (n = 3924), 10.5% (n = 412) received ODX testing. Specifically, 11.7% of the Caucasian patients and 5.1% of AAs patients received ODX testing (P < 0.001). Our analysis confirmed that the utilization of ODX was low and that AAs were much less likely to receive ODX testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5345634
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53456342017-03-14 Low utility of Oncotype DX® in the clinic Ricks‐Santi, Luisel J. McDonald, John Tyson Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research Precision medicine tools are currently making their way into the clinic and being utilized to diagnose, prognose, and individualize cancer care. The multi‐gene expression‐based assay, Oncotype DX® (ODX), is a genomic tumor profiling tool that determines the expression of 21 tumor‐ associated genes; it helps determine the risk for distant recurrence and whether chemotherapy is an appropriate course of treatment in patients with early stage, estrogen receptor (ER) positive, HER2 negative, and lymph node negative (or 1–3 positive lymph nodes) invasive BCa. The aim of this study was to determine the overall utilization and uptake of the ODX genomic test in a cross‐sectional analysis of the Virginia Tumor registry, compare utilization in African Americans (AAs) and Caucasian Americans (CAs), and determine the profile of patients referred for testing. Caucasian (89.7%) patients made up the majority of the ODX testers compared to AAs (10.3%) (P < 0.0001). Those who received ODX testing were less likely to have higher grade and higher stage tumors, and were less likely to be ER negative (RR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.01–0.31), progesterone receptor (PR) negative (RR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.27–0.45), HER2 amplified (RR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.17–0.43), or triple negative (RR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.14–0.33). Of the patients that were eligible (n = 3924), 10.5% (n = 412) received ODX testing. Specifically, 11.7% of the Caucasian patients and 5.1% of AAs patients received ODX testing (P < 0.001). Our analysis confirmed that the utilization of ODX was low and that AAs were much less likely to receive ODX testing. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5345634/ /pubmed/28145091 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.837 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Research
Ricks‐Santi, Luisel J.
McDonald, John Tyson
Low utility of Oncotype DX® in the clinic
title Low utility of Oncotype DX® in the clinic
title_full Low utility of Oncotype DX® in the clinic
title_fullStr Low utility of Oncotype DX® in the clinic
title_full_unstemmed Low utility of Oncotype DX® in the clinic
title_short Low utility of Oncotype DX® in the clinic
title_sort low utility of oncotype dx® in the clinic
topic Clinical Cancer Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5345634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28145091
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.837
work_keys_str_mv AT rickssantiluiselj lowutilityofoncotypedxintheclinic
AT mcdonaldjohntyson lowutilityofoncotypedxintheclinic