Cargando…
Out‐of‐pocket costs and burden among rural breast cancer survivors
Little is known about out‐of‐pocket (OOP) costs incurred for medical and health needs by rural breast cancer survivors and what factors may be associated with higher OOP costs and the associated economic burden. Data were examined for 432 survivors participating in the Rural Breast Cancer Survivor I...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5345680/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28229562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1017 |
_version_ | 1782513763976478720 |
---|---|
author | Pisu, Maria Azuero, Andres Benz, Rachel McNees, Patrick Meneses, Karen |
author_facet | Pisu, Maria Azuero, Andres Benz, Rachel McNees, Patrick Meneses, Karen |
author_sort | Pisu, Maria |
collection | PubMed |
description | Little is known about out‐of‐pocket (OOP) costs incurred for medical and health needs by rural breast cancer survivors and what factors may be associated with higher OOP costs and the associated economic burden. Data were examined for 432 survivors participating in the Rural Breast Cancer Survivor Intervention trial. OOP costs were collected using the Work and Finances Inventory survey at baseline and four assessments every 3 months. Mean and median OOP costs and burden (percent of monthly income spent on OOP costs) were reported and factors associated with OOP costs and burden identified with generalized linear models fitted with over‐dispersed gamma distributions and logarithmic links (OOP costs) and with beta distributions with logit link (OOP burden). OOP costs per month since the end of treatment were on average $232.7 (median $95.6), declined at the next assessment point to $186.5 (median $89.1), and thereafter remained at that level. Mean OOP burden was 9% at baseline and between 7% and 8% at the next assessments. Factors suggestive of contributing to higher OOP costs and OOP burden were the following: younger age, lower income, time in survivorship from diagnosis, and use of supportive services. OOP costs burden rural breast cancer survivors, particularly those who are younger and low income. Research should investigate the impact of OOP costs and interventions to reduce economic burden. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5345680 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53456802017-03-14 Out‐of‐pocket costs and burden among rural breast cancer survivors Pisu, Maria Azuero, Andres Benz, Rachel McNees, Patrick Meneses, Karen Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research Little is known about out‐of‐pocket (OOP) costs incurred for medical and health needs by rural breast cancer survivors and what factors may be associated with higher OOP costs and the associated economic burden. Data were examined for 432 survivors participating in the Rural Breast Cancer Survivor Intervention trial. OOP costs were collected using the Work and Finances Inventory survey at baseline and four assessments every 3 months. Mean and median OOP costs and burden (percent of monthly income spent on OOP costs) were reported and factors associated with OOP costs and burden identified with generalized linear models fitted with over‐dispersed gamma distributions and logarithmic links (OOP costs) and with beta distributions with logit link (OOP burden). OOP costs per month since the end of treatment were on average $232.7 (median $95.6), declined at the next assessment point to $186.5 (median $89.1), and thereafter remained at that level. Mean OOP burden was 9% at baseline and between 7% and 8% at the next assessments. Factors suggestive of contributing to higher OOP costs and OOP burden were the following: younger age, lower income, time in survivorship from diagnosis, and use of supportive services. OOP costs burden rural breast cancer survivors, particularly those who are younger and low income. Research should investigate the impact of OOP costs and interventions to reduce economic burden. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5345680/ /pubmed/28229562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1017 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Cancer Research Pisu, Maria Azuero, Andres Benz, Rachel McNees, Patrick Meneses, Karen Out‐of‐pocket costs and burden among rural breast cancer survivors |
title | Out‐of‐pocket costs and burden among rural breast cancer survivors |
title_full | Out‐of‐pocket costs and burden among rural breast cancer survivors |
title_fullStr | Out‐of‐pocket costs and burden among rural breast cancer survivors |
title_full_unstemmed | Out‐of‐pocket costs and burden among rural breast cancer survivors |
title_short | Out‐of‐pocket costs and burden among rural breast cancer survivors |
title_sort | out‐of‐pocket costs and burden among rural breast cancer survivors |
topic | Clinical Cancer Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5345680/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28229562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1017 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pisumaria outofpocketcostsandburdenamongruralbreastcancersurvivors AT azueroandres outofpocketcostsandburdenamongruralbreastcancersurvivors AT benzrachel outofpocketcostsandburdenamongruralbreastcancersurvivors AT mcneespatrick outofpocketcostsandburdenamongruralbreastcancersurvivors AT meneseskaren outofpocketcostsandburdenamongruralbreastcancersurvivors |