Cargando…

Vaccine Hesitancy: In Search of the Risk Communication Comfort Zone

INTRODUCTION: This paper reports the findings of a national online survey to parents of children aged 5 and younger. The objectives of the study were to assess parental understanding of childhood immunizations, identify sources of information that they trust for vaccine-related content, assess where...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Greenberg, Joshua, Dubé, Eve, Driedger, Michelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5346025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28357154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/currents.outbreaks.0561a011117a1d1f9596e24949e8690b
_version_ 1782513820575465472
author Greenberg, Joshua
Dubé, Eve
Driedger, Michelle
author_facet Greenberg, Joshua
Dubé, Eve
Driedger, Michelle
author_sort Greenberg, Joshua
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This paper reports the findings of a national online survey to parents of children aged 5 and younger. The objectives of the study were to assess parental understanding of childhood immunizations, identify sources of information that they trust for vaccine-related content, assess where parents with young children stand on the key issues in the public debate about vaccination, and identify which risk communication messages are most effective for influencing the behaviours of vaccine hesitant parents. METHODS: A total of 1,000 surveys (closed and open-ended questions) were administered in November 2015 using the Angus Reid Forum Panel, a key consumer panel consisting of approximately 150,000 Canadian adults aged 18 and older, spread across all geographic regions of Canada. RESULTS: Approximately 92% of the Canadian parents surveyed consider vaccines safe and effective, and trust doctors and public health officials to provide timely and credible vaccine-related information. However, a concerning number of them either believe or are uncertain whether there is a link between vaccines and autism (28%), worry that vaccines might seriously harm their children (27%), or believe the pharmaceutical industry is behind the push for mandatory immunization (33%). Moreover, despite the common assumption that social media are becoming the go-to source of health news and information, most parents still rely on traditional media and official government websites for timely and credible information about vaccines and vaccine preventable diseases, particularly during community-based disease outbreaks. Finally, parents reported high levels of support for pro-vaccine messaging that has been demonstrated in previous research to have little to no positive impact on behaviour change, and may even be counterproductive. DISCUSSION: The study’s results are highly relevant in a context where public health officials are expending significant resources to increase rates of childhood immunization and combat vaccine hesitancy. The data offer insight into where parents stand on the political and public debate about mandatory vaccination, what aspects of vaccine science remain uncertain to them, which media and institutional sources they use and trust to navigate the health information environment, how they look for information and whom they trust during periods of health emergency or crisis, and which communication strategies are considered most effective in persuading vaccine hesitant parents to immunize their children.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5346025
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53460252017-03-28 Vaccine Hesitancy: In Search of the Risk Communication Comfort Zone Greenberg, Joshua Dubé, Eve Driedger, Michelle PLoS Curr Research Article INTRODUCTION: This paper reports the findings of a national online survey to parents of children aged 5 and younger. The objectives of the study were to assess parental understanding of childhood immunizations, identify sources of information that they trust for vaccine-related content, assess where parents with young children stand on the key issues in the public debate about vaccination, and identify which risk communication messages are most effective for influencing the behaviours of vaccine hesitant parents. METHODS: A total of 1,000 surveys (closed and open-ended questions) were administered in November 2015 using the Angus Reid Forum Panel, a key consumer panel consisting of approximately 150,000 Canadian adults aged 18 and older, spread across all geographic regions of Canada. RESULTS: Approximately 92% of the Canadian parents surveyed consider vaccines safe and effective, and trust doctors and public health officials to provide timely and credible vaccine-related information. However, a concerning number of them either believe or are uncertain whether there is a link between vaccines and autism (28%), worry that vaccines might seriously harm their children (27%), or believe the pharmaceutical industry is behind the push for mandatory immunization (33%). Moreover, despite the common assumption that social media are becoming the go-to source of health news and information, most parents still rely on traditional media and official government websites for timely and credible information about vaccines and vaccine preventable diseases, particularly during community-based disease outbreaks. Finally, parents reported high levels of support for pro-vaccine messaging that has been demonstrated in previous research to have little to no positive impact on behaviour change, and may even be counterproductive. DISCUSSION: The study’s results are highly relevant in a context where public health officials are expending significant resources to increase rates of childhood immunization and combat vaccine hesitancy. The data offer insight into where parents stand on the political and public debate about mandatory vaccination, what aspects of vaccine science remain uncertain to them, which media and institutional sources they use and trust to navigate the health information environment, how they look for information and whom they trust during periods of health emergency or crisis, and which communication strategies are considered most effective in persuading vaccine hesitant parents to immunize their children. Public Library of Science 2017-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5346025/ /pubmed/28357154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/currents.outbreaks.0561a011117a1d1f9596e24949e8690b Text en © 2017 Greenberg, Dubé, Driedger, et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Greenberg, Joshua
Dubé, Eve
Driedger, Michelle
Vaccine Hesitancy: In Search of the Risk Communication Comfort Zone
title Vaccine Hesitancy: In Search of the Risk Communication Comfort Zone
title_full Vaccine Hesitancy: In Search of the Risk Communication Comfort Zone
title_fullStr Vaccine Hesitancy: In Search of the Risk Communication Comfort Zone
title_full_unstemmed Vaccine Hesitancy: In Search of the Risk Communication Comfort Zone
title_short Vaccine Hesitancy: In Search of the Risk Communication Comfort Zone
title_sort vaccine hesitancy: in search of the risk communication comfort zone
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5346025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28357154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/currents.outbreaks.0561a011117a1d1f9596e24949e8690b
work_keys_str_mv AT greenbergjoshua vaccinehesitancyinsearchoftheriskcommunicationcomfortzone
AT dubeeve vaccinehesitancyinsearchoftheriskcommunicationcomfortzone
AT driedgermichelle vaccinehesitancyinsearchoftheriskcommunicationcomfortzone