Cargando…

The Impact of 3-Option Responses to Multiple-Choice Questions on Guessing Strategies and Cut Score Determinations

INTRODUCTION: Research has asserted MCQ items using three response options (one correct answer with two distractors) is comparable to, and possibly preferable over, traditional MCQ item formats consisting of four response options (e.g., one correct answer with three distractors), or five response op...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: ROYAL, KENNETH D., STOCKDALE, MYRAH R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5346173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28367465
_version_ 1782513837716537344
author ROYAL, KENNETH D.
STOCKDALE, MYRAH R.
author_facet ROYAL, KENNETH D.
STOCKDALE, MYRAH R.
author_sort ROYAL, KENNETH D.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Research has asserted MCQ items using three response options (one correct answer with two distractors) is comparable to, and possibly preferable over, traditional MCQ item formats consisting of four response options (e.g., one correct answer with three distractors), or five response options (e.g., one correct answer with four distractors). Some medical educators have also adopted the practice of using 3-option responses on MCQ exams as a response to the difficulty experienced in generating additional plausible distractors. To date, however, little work has explored how 3-option responses might impact validity threats stemming from random guessing strategies, and what impact 3-option responses might have on cut-score determinations, particularly in the context of medical education classroom assessments. The purpose of this work is to further explore these critically important considerations that largely have gone ignored in the medical education literature to this point. METHODS: A cumulative binomial distribution formula was used to calculate the probability that an examinee will answer at random a given number of items correctly on any exam (of any length). By way of a demonstration, a variety of scenarios were presented to illustrate how examination length and the number of response options impact examinees’ chances of passing a given examination, and how subsequent cut-score decisions may be impacted by these factors. RESULTS: As a general rule, classroom assessments containing fewer items should utilize traditional 4-option or 5-option responses, whereas assessments of greater length are afforded greater flexibility in potentially utilizing 3-option responses. CONCLUSIONS: More research on items with 3-option responses is needed to better understand what value, if any, 3-option responses truly add to classroom assessments, and in what contexts potential benefits might be discernible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5346173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53461732017-04-01 The Impact of 3-Option Responses to Multiple-Choice Questions on Guessing Strategies and Cut Score Determinations ROYAL, KENNETH D. STOCKDALE, MYRAH R. J Adv Med Educ Prof Commentary INTRODUCTION: Research has asserted MCQ items using three response options (one correct answer with two distractors) is comparable to, and possibly preferable over, traditional MCQ item formats consisting of four response options (e.g., one correct answer with three distractors), or five response options (e.g., one correct answer with four distractors). Some medical educators have also adopted the practice of using 3-option responses on MCQ exams as a response to the difficulty experienced in generating additional plausible distractors. To date, however, little work has explored how 3-option responses might impact validity threats stemming from random guessing strategies, and what impact 3-option responses might have on cut-score determinations, particularly in the context of medical education classroom assessments. The purpose of this work is to further explore these critically important considerations that largely have gone ignored in the medical education literature to this point. METHODS: A cumulative binomial distribution formula was used to calculate the probability that an examinee will answer at random a given number of items correctly on any exam (of any length). By way of a demonstration, a variety of scenarios were presented to illustrate how examination length and the number of response options impact examinees’ chances of passing a given examination, and how subsequent cut-score decisions may be impacted by these factors. RESULTS: As a general rule, classroom assessments containing fewer items should utilize traditional 4-option or 5-option responses, whereas assessments of greater length are afforded greater flexibility in potentially utilizing 3-option responses. CONCLUSIONS: More research on items with 3-option responses is needed to better understand what value, if any, 3-option responses truly add to classroom assessments, and in what contexts potential benefits might be discernible. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism 2017-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5346173/ /pubmed/28367465 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Commentary
ROYAL, KENNETH D.
STOCKDALE, MYRAH R.
The Impact of 3-Option Responses to Multiple-Choice Questions on Guessing Strategies and Cut Score Determinations
title The Impact of 3-Option Responses to Multiple-Choice Questions on Guessing Strategies and Cut Score Determinations
title_full The Impact of 3-Option Responses to Multiple-Choice Questions on Guessing Strategies and Cut Score Determinations
title_fullStr The Impact of 3-Option Responses to Multiple-Choice Questions on Guessing Strategies and Cut Score Determinations
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of 3-Option Responses to Multiple-Choice Questions on Guessing Strategies and Cut Score Determinations
title_short The Impact of 3-Option Responses to Multiple-Choice Questions on Guessing Strategies and Cut Score Determinations
title_sort impact of 3-option responses to multiple-choice questions on guessing strategies and cut score determinations
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5346173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28367465
work_keys_str_mv AT royalkennethd theimpactof3optionresponsestomultiplechoicequestionsonguessingstrategiesandcutscoredeterminations
AT stockdalemyrahr theimpactof3optionresponsestomultiplechoicequestionsonguessingstrategiesandcutscoredeterminations
AT royalkennethd impactof3optionresponsestomultiplechoicequestionsonguessingstrategiesandcutscoredeterminations
AT stockdalemyrahr impactof3optionresponsestomultiplechoicequestionsonguessingstrategiesandcutscoredeterminations