Cargando…

3-D computer modelling of malunited posterior malleolar fractures: effect of fragment size and offset on ankle stability, contact pressure and pattern

BACKGROUND: The positioning of the fracture fragment of a posterior malleolus fracture is critical to healing and a successful outcome as malunion of a posterior malleolar fracture, a condition seen in clinical practice, can affect the dynamics of the ankle joint, cause posterolateral rotational sub...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alonso-Rasgado, Teresa, Jimenez-Cruz, David, Karski, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5346225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28293302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-017-0194-5
_version_ 1782513846946103296
author Alonso-Rasgado, Teresa
Jimenez-Cruz, David
Karski, Michael
author_facet Alonso-Rasgado, Teresa
Jimenez-Cruz, David
Karski, Michael
author_sort Alonso-Rasgado, Teresa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The positioning of the fracture fragment of a posterior malleolus fracture is critical to healing and a successful outcome as malunion of a posterior malleolar fracture, a condition seen in clinical practice, can affect the dynamics of the ankle joint, cause posterolateral rotational subluxation of the talus and ultimately lead to destruction of the joint. Current consensus is to employ anatomic reduction with internal fixation when the fragment size is larger than 25 to 33% of the tibial plafond. METHODS: A 3-dimensional finite element (FE) model of ankle was developed in order to investigate the effect of fragment size (6–15 mm) and offset (1–4 mm) of a malunited posterior malleolus on tibiotalar joint contact area, pressure, motion of joint and ligament forces. Three positions of the joint were simulated; neutral position, 20° dorsiflexion and 30° plantarflexion. RESULTS: Compared to the intact joint our model predicted that contact area was greater in all malunion scenarios considered. In general, the joint contact area was affected more by section length than section offset. In addition fibula contact area played a role in all the malunion cases. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence to support the current consensus of fixing posterior malleolus fractures of greater than 25% of the tibial plafond. Our model predicted joint instability only with the highest level of fracture in a loaded limb at an extreme position of dorsiflexion. No increase of peak contact pressure as a result of malunion was predicted but contact pattern was modified. The results of our study support the view that in cases of posterior malleolar fracture, posttraumatic osteoarthritis occurs as a result of load on areas of cartilage not used to loading rather than an increase in contact pressure. Ankle repositioning resulted in increased force in two ankle ligaments. Our finding could explain commonly reported clinical observations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5346225
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53462252017-03-14 3-D computer modelling of malunited posterior malleolar fractures: effect of fragment size and offset on ankle stability, contact pressure and pattern Alonso-Rasgado, Teresa Jimenez-Cruz, David Karski, Michael J Foot Ankle Res Research BACKGROUND: The positioning of the fracture fragment of a posterior malleolus fracture is critical to healing and a successful outcome as malunion of a posterior malleolar fracture, a condition seen in clinical practice, can affect the dynamics of the ankle joint, cause posterolateral rotational subluxation of the talus and ultimately lead to destruction of the joint. Current consensus is to employ anatomic reduction with internal fixation when the fragment size is larger than 25 to 33% of the tibial plafond. METHODS: A 3-dimensional finite element (FE) model of ankle was developed in order to investigate the effect of fragment size (6–15 mm) and offset (1–4 mm) of a malunited posterior malleolus on tibiotalar joint contact area, pressure, motion of joint and ligament forces. Three positions of the joint were simulated; neutral position, 20° dorsiflexion and 30° plantarflexion. RESULTS: Compared to the intact joint our model predicted that contact area was greater in all malunion scenarios considered. In general, the joint contact area was affected more by section length than section offset. In addition fibula contact area played a role in all the malunion cases. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence to support the current consensus of fixing posterior malleolus fractures of greater than 25% of the tibial plafond. Our model predicted joint instability only with the highest level of fracture in a loaded limb at an extreme position of dorsiflexion. No increase of peak contact pressure as a result of malunion was predicted but contact pattern was modified. The results of our study support the view that in cases of posterior malleolar fracture, posttraumatic osteoarthritis occurs as a result of load on areas of cartilage not used to loading rather than an increase in contact pressure. Ankle repositioning resulted in increased force in two ankle ligaments. Our finding could explain commonly reported clinical observations. BioMed Central 2017-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5346225/ /pubmed/28293302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-017-0194-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Alonso-Rasgado, Teresa
Jimenez-Cruz, David
Karski, Michael
3-D computer modelling of malunited posterior malleolar fractures: effect of fragment size and offset on ankle stability, contact pressure and pattern
title 3-D computer modelling of malunited posterior malleolar fractures: effect of fragment size and offset on ankle stability, contact pressure and pattern
title_full 3-D computer modelling of malunited posterior malleolar fractures: effect of fragment size and offset on ankle stability, contact pressure and pattern
title_fullStr 3-D computer modelling of malunited posterior malleolar fractures: effect of fragment size and offset on ankle stability, contact pressure and pattern
title_full_unstemmed 3-D computer modelling of malunited posterior malleolar fractures: effect of fragment size and offset on ankle stability, contact pressure and pattern
title_short 3-D computer modelling of malunited posterior malleolar fractures: effect of fragment size and offset on ankle stability, contact pressure and pattern
title_sort 3-d computer modelling of malunited posterior malleolar fractures: effect of fragment size and offset on ankle stability, contact pressure and pattern
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5346225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28293302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-017-0194-5
work_keys_str_mv AT alonsorasgadoteresa 3dcomputermodellingofmalunitedposteriormalleolarfractureseffectoffragmentsizeandoffsetonanklestabilitycontactpressureandpattern
AT jimenezcruzdavid 3dcomputermodellingofmalunitedposteriormalleolarfractureseffectoffragmentsizeandoffsetonanklestabilitycontactpressureandpattern
AT karskimichael 3dcomputermodellingofmalunitedposteriormalleolarfractureseffectoffragmentsizeandoffsetonanklestabilitycontactpressureandpattern