Cargando…

Feasibility and Safety of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) has been introduced as a novel repeatable treatment for peritoneal carcinomatosis. The available evidence from the pioneer center suggests good tolerance and high response rates, but independent confirmation is needed. A single-cen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hübner, Martin, Teixeira Farinha, Hugo, Grass, Fabian, Wolfer, Anita, Mathevet, Patrice, Hahnloser, Dieter, Demartines, Nicolas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5346367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28331493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/6852749
_version_ 1782513869255606272
author Hübner, Martin
Teixeira Farinha, Hugo
Grass, Fabian
Wolfer, Anita
Mathevet, Patrice
Hahnloser, Dieter
Demartines, Nicolas
author_facet Hübner, Martin
Teixeira Farinha, Hugo
Grass, Fabian
Wolfer, Anita
Mathevet, Patrice
Hahnloser, Dieter
Demartines, Nicolas
author_sort Hübner, Martin
collection PubMed
description Background. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) has been introduced as a novel repeatable treatment for peritoneal carcinomatosis. The available evidence from the pioneer center suggests good tolerance and high response rates, but independent confirmation is needed. A single-center cohort was analyzed one year after implementation for feasibility and safety. Methods. PIPAC was started in January 2015, and every patient was entered into a prospective database. This retrospective analysis included all consecutive patients operated until April 2016 with emphasis on surgical feasibility and early postoperative outcomes. Results. Forty-two patients (M : F = 8 : 34, median age 66 (59–73) years) with 91 PIPAC procedures in total (4×: 1,  3×: 17,  2×: 12, and  1×: 12) were analyzed. Abdominal accessibility rate was 95% (42/44); laparoscopic access was not feasible in 2 patients with previous HIPEC. Median initial peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) was 10 (IQR 5–17). Median operation time was 94 min (89–108) with no learning curve observed. One PIPAC application was postponed due to intraoperative intestinal lesion. Overall morbidity was 9% with 7 minor complications (Clavien I-II) and one PIPAC-unrelated postoperative mortality. Median postoperative hospital stay was 3 days (2-3). Conclusion. Repetitive PIPAC is feasible in most patients with refractory carcinomatosis of various origins. Intraoperative complications and postoperative morbidity rates were low. This encourages prospective studies assessing oncological efficacy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5346367
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53463672017-03-22 Feasibility and Safety of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study Hübner, Martin Teixeira Farinha, Hugo Grass, Fabian Wolfer, Anita Mathevet, Patrice Hahnloser, Dieter Demartines, Nicolas Gastroenterol Res Pract Research Article Background. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) has been introduced as a novel repeatable treatment for peritoneal carcinomatosis. The available evidence from the pioneer center suggests good tolerance and high response rates, but independent confirmation is needed. A single-center cohort was analyzed one year after implementation for feasibility and safety. Methods. PIPAC was started in January 2015, and every patient was entered into a prospective database. This retrospective analysis included all consecutive patients operated until April 2016 with emphasis on surgical feasibility and early postoperative outcomes. Results. Forty-two patients (M : F = 8 : 34, median age 66 (59–73) years) with 91 PIPAC procedures in total (4×: 1,  3×: 17,  2×: 12, and  1×: 12) were analyzed. Abdominal accessibility rate was 95% (42/44); laparoscopic access was not feasible in 2 patients with previous HIPEC. Median initial peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) was 10 (IQR 5–17). Median operation time was 94 min (89–108) with no learning curve observed. One PIPAC application was postponed due to intraoperative intestinal lesion. Overall morbidity was 9% with 7 minor complications (Clavien I-II) and one PIPAC-unrelated postoperative mortality. Median postoperative hospital stay was 3 days (2-3). Conclusion. Repetitive PIPAC is feasible in most patients with refractory carcinomatosis of various origins. Intraoperative complications and postoperative morbidity rates were low. This encourages prospective studies assessing oncological efficacy. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2017 2017-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5346367/ /pubmed/28331493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/6852749 Text en Copyright © 2017 Martin Hübner et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hübner, Martin
Teixeira Farinha, Hugo
Grass, Fabian
Wolfer, Anita
Mathevet, Patrice
Hahnloser, Dieter
Demartines, Nicolas
Feasibility and Safety of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title Feasibility and Safety of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full Feasibility and Safety of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_fullStr Feasibility and Safety of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility and Safety of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_short Feasibility and Safety of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_sort feasibility and safety of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis: a retrospective cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5346367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28331493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/6852749
work_keys_str_mv AT hubnermartin feasibilityandsafetyofpressurizedintraperitonealaerosolchemotherapyforperitonealcarcinomatosisaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT teixeirafarinhahugo feasibilityandsafetyofpressurizedintraperitonealaerosolchemotherapyforperitonealcarcinomatosisaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT grassfabian feasibilityandsafetyofpressurizedintraperitonealaerosolchemotherapyforperitonealcarcinomatosisaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT wolferanita feasibilityandsafetyofpressurizedintraperitonealaerosolchemotherapyforperitonealcarcinomatosisaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT mathevetpatrice feasibilityandsafetyofpressurizedintraperitonealaerosolchemotherapyforperitonealcarcinomatosisaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT hahnloserdieter feasibilityandsafetyofpressurizedintraperitonealaerosolchemotherapyforperitonealcarcinomatosisaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT demartinesnicolas feasibilityandsafetyofpressurizedintraperitonealaerosolchemotherapyforperitonealcarcinomatosisaretrospectivecohortstudy