Cargando…

From the evaluation of existing solutions to an all-inclusive package for biobanks

The domain of biobanking has gone through many stages and as a result there are a wide range of commercial and open source software solutions available. The utilization of these software tools requires different levels of domain and technical skills for installation, configuration and ultimate us of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Müller, Heimo, Malservet, Nicolas, Quinlan, Philip, Reihs, Robert, Penicaud, Matthieu, Chami, Antoine, Zatloukal, Kurt, Dagher, George
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5346419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28344915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12553-016-0175-x
_version_ 1782513880936742912
author Müller, Heimo
Malservet, Nicolas
Quinlan, Philip
Reihs, Robert
Penicaud, Matthieu
Chami, Antoine
Zatloukal, Kurt
Dagher, George
author_facet Müller, Heimo
Malservet, Nicolas
Quinlan, Philip
Reihs, Robert
Penicaud, Matthieu
Chami, Antoine
Zatloukal, Kurt
Dagher, George
author_sort Müller, Heimo
collection PubMed
description The domain of biobanking has gone through many stages and as a result there are a wide range of commercial and open source software solutions available. The utilization of these software tools requires different levels of domain and technical skills for installation, configuration and ultimate us of these biobank software tools. To compound this complexity the biobanking community are required to work together in order to share knowledge and jointly build solutions to underpin the research infrastructure. We have evaluated the available tools, described them in a catalogue (BiobankApps) and made a selection of tools available to biobanks in a reference toolbox (BIBBOX) that are use-case driven. In the BiobankApps tool catalogue, both commercial and open source software solutions related to the biobanking domain are included, classified and evaluated. The evaluation covers: 1) “user review” by an authenticated user 2) domain expert: quick analysis by BBMRI members and 3) domain expert: detailed analysis and test installation with real world data. The evaluation is paired with a survey across the more “advanced” (from a technology perspective) biobanks to investigate what tools are currently used and summarises known benefits/drawbacks of the respective packages. In the second step we recommend tools for specific use cases, and install, configure and connect these in the BIBBOX framework. This service also builds on the existing work in the United Kingdom in seeking to establish the motivations for different stakeholders to become involved and therefore assisting in prioritising the use-cases based on the level of need and support within the research community. All tools associated to a use-case are available as BIBBOX applications (technically this is achieved by docker containers), which are integrated in the BIBBOX framework with central identification and user management. In future work we plan to share the acquired knowledge with other networks, develop an Application Programmable Interface (API) for the exchange of metadata with other tool catalogues and work on an ontology for the evaluation of biobank software.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5346419
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53464192017-03-24 From the evaluation of existing solutions to an all-inclusive package for biobanks Müller, Heimo Malservet, Nicolas Quinlan, Philip Reihs, Robert Penicaud, Matthieu Chami, Antoine Zatloukal, Kurt Dagher, George Health Technol (Berl) Original Paper The domain of biobanking has gone through many stages and as a result there are a wide range of commercial and open source software solutions available. The utilization of these software tools requires different levels of domain and technical skills for installation, configuration and ultimate us of these biobank software tools. To compound this complexity the biobanking community are required to work together in order to share knowledge and jointly build solutions to underpin the research infrastructure. We have evaluated the available tools, described them in a catalogue (BiobankApps) and made a selection of tools available to biobanks in a reference toolbox (BIBBOX) that are use-case driven. In the BiobankApps tool catalogue, both commercial and open source software solutions related to the biobanking domain are included, classified and evaluated. The evaluation covers: 1) “user review” by an authenticated user 2) domain expert: quick analysis by BBMRI members and 3) domain expert: detailed analysis and test installation with real world data. The evaluation is paired with a survey across the more “advanced” (from a technology perspective) biobanks to investigate what tools are currently used and summarises known benefits/drawbacks of the respective packages. In the second step we recommend tools for specific use cases, and install, configure and connect these in the BIBBOX framework. This service also builds on the existing work in the United Kingdom in seeking to establish the motivations for different stakeholders to become involved and therefore assisting in prioritising the use-cases based on the level of need and support within the research community. All tools associated to a use-case are available as BIBBOX applications (technically this is achieved by docker containers), which are integrated in the BIBBOX framework with central identification and user management. In future work we plan to share the acquired knowledge with other networks, develop an Application Programmable Interface (API) for the exchange of metadata with other tool catalogues and work on an ontology for the evaluation of biobank software. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-01-12 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5346419/ /pubmed/28344915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12553-016-0175-x Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Müller, Heimo
Malservet, Nicolas
Quinlan, Philip
Reihs, Robert
Penicaud, Matthieu
Chami, Antoine
Zatloukal, Kurt
Dagher, George
From the evaluation of existing solutions to an all-inclusive package for biobanks
title From the evaluation of existing solutions to an all-inclusive package for biobanks
title_full From the evaluation of existing solutions to an all-inclusive package for biobanks
title_fullStr From the evaluation of existing solutions to an all-inclusive package for biobanks
title_full_unstemmed From the evaluation of existing solutions to an all-inclusive package for biobanks
title_short From the evaluation of existing solutions to an all-inclusive package for biobanks
title_sort from the evaluation of existing solutions to an all-inclusive package for biobanks
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5346419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28344915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12553-016-0175-x
work_keys_str_mv AT mullerheimo fromtheevaluationofexistingsolutionstoanallinclusivepackageforbiobanks
AT malservetnicolas fromtheevaluationofexistingsolutionstoanallinclusivepackageforbiobanks
AT quinlanphilip fromtheevaluationofexistingsolutionstoanallinclusivepackageforbiobanks
AT reihsrobert fromtheevaluationofexistingsolutionstoanallinclusivepackageforbiobanks
AT penicaudmatthieu fromtheevaluationofexistingsolutionstoanallinclusivepackageforbiobanks
AT chamiantoine fromtheevaluationofexistingsolutionstoanallinclusivepackageforbiobanks
AT zatloukalkurt fromtheevaluationofexistingsolutionstoanallinclusivepackageforbiobanks
AT daghergeorge fromtheevaluationofexistingsolutionstoanallinclusivepackageforbiobanks