Cargando…

Predictors for treatment outcomes after corneal crosslinking for keratoconus: a validation study

Previous research suggested that baseline corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and maximum keratometry (Kmax) are the predictors for effectiveness of corneal crosslinking (CXL) for keratoconus. The aim of this study was to validate the previously determined predictors in a new treatment cohort. A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Godefrooij, Daniel A., Boom, Kim, Soeters, Nienke, Imhof, Saskia M., Wisse, Robert P. L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5346429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27221267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-016-0262-z
_version_ 1782513883484782592
author Godefrooij, Daniel A.
Boom, Kim
Soeters, Nienke
Imhof, Saskia M.
Wisse, Robert P. L.
author_facet Godefrooij, Daniel A.
Boom, Kim
Soeters, Nienke
Imhof, Saskia M.
Wisse, Robert P. L.
author_sort Godefrooij, Daniel A.
collection PubMed
description Previous research suggested that baseline corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and maximum keratometry (Kmax) are the predictors for effectiveness of corneal crosslinking (CXL) for keratoconus. The aim of this study was to validate the previously determined predictors in a new treatment cohort. A prospective cohort of 112 eyes in 90 consecutive patients was used to validate the results of 102 eyes in 79 patients from our previous prospective cohort. All patients were treated using epithelium-off corneal CXL in a tertiary hospital setting. Primary outcomes were changes in CDVA (LogMAR) and Kmax between baseline and 1-year post-treatment. Predictive factors for both outcomes were determined using univariable and multivariable analyses. Lower pretreatment CDVA was found to be the sole independent factor predicting an improvement in CDVA 1 year after CXL (β coefficient: −0.476, P < 0.01). Kmax flattening is more likely to take place in eyes with preoperative central cones (β coefficient: 0.655, P < 0.01). These results are consistent with our initial research and indicate high reproducibility in the new cohort. The previously postulated prediction model for postoperative CDVA showed limited predictive value in the validation cohort (R (2) = 0.15). The clinical implication of these results is that patients with lower pretreatment visual acuity are more likely to benefit from CXL (with respect to visual acuity), and patients with more central cones will benefit more in terms of cone flattening. Furthermore, those results can be used to guide customization of the crosslinking treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5346429
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53464292017-03-24 Predictors for treatment outcomes after corneal crosslinking for keratoconus: a validation study Godefrooij, Daniel A. Boom, Kim Soeters, Nienke Imhof, Saskia M. Wisse, Robert P. L. Int Ophthalmol Original Paper Previous research suggested that baseline corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and maximum keratometry (Kmax) are the predictors for effectiveness of corneal crosslinking (CXL) for keratoconus. The aim of this study was to validate the previously determined predictors in a new treatment cohort. A prospective cohort of 112 eyes in 90 consecutive patients was used to validate the results of 102 eyes in 79 patients from our previous prospective cohort. All patients were treated using epithelium-off corneal CXL in a tertiary hospital setting. Primary outcomes were changes in CDVA (LogMAR) and Kmax between baseline and 1-year post-treatment. Predictive factors for both outcomes were determined using univariable and multivariable analyses. Lower pretreatment CDVA was found to be the sole independent factor predicting an improvement in CDVA 1 year after CXL (β coefficient: −0.476, P < 0.01). Kmax flattening is more likely to take place in eyes with preoperative central cones (β coefficient: 0.655, P < 0.01). These results are consistent with our initial research and indicate high reproducibility in the new cohort. The previously postulated prediction model for postoperative CDVA showed limited predictive value in the validation cohort (R (2) = 0.15). The clinical implication of these results is that patients with lower pretreatment visual acuity are more likely to benefit from CXL (with respect to visual acuity), and patients with more central cones will benefit more in terms of cone flattening. Furthermore, those results can be used to guide customization of the crosslinking treatment. Springer Netherlands 2016-05-24 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5346429/ /pubmed/27221267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-016-0262-z Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Godefrooij, Daniel A.
Boom, Kim
Soeters, Nienke
Imhof, Saskia M.
Wisse, Robert P. L.
Predictors for treatment outcomes after corneal crosslinking for keratoconus: a validation study
title Predictors for treatment outcomes after corneal crosslinking for keratoconus: a validation study
title_full Predictors for treatment outcomes after corneal crosslinking for keratoconus: a validation study
title_fullStr Predictors for treatment outcomes after corneal crosslinking for keratoconus: a validation study
title_full_unstemmed Predictors for treatment outcomes after corneal crosslinking for keratoconus: a validation study
title_short Predictors for treatment outcomes after corneal crosslinking for keratoconus: a validation study
title_sort predictors for treatment outcomes after corneal crosslinking for keratoconus: a validation study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5346429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27221267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-016-0262-z
work_keys_str_mv AT godefrooijdaniela predictorsfortreatmentoutcomesaftercornealcrosslinkingforkeratoconusavalidationstudy
AT boomkim predictorsfortreatmentoutcomesaftercornealcrosslinkingforkeratoconusavalidationstudy
AT soetersnienke predictorsfortreatmentoutcomesaftercornealcrosslinkingforkeratoconusavalidationstudy
AT imhofsaskiam predictorsfortreatmentoutcomesaftercornealcrosslinkingforkeratoconusavalidationstudy
AT wisserobertpl predictorsfortreatmentoutcomesaftercornealcrosslinkingforkeratoconusavalidationstudy