Cargando…
A method for independent component graph analysis of resting‐state fMRI
INTRODUCTION: Independent component analysis (ICA) has been extensively used for reducing task‐free BOLD fMRI recordings into spatial maps and their associated time‐courses. The spatially identified independent components can be considered as intrinsic connectivity networks (ICNs) of non‐contiguous...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5346515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28293468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.626 |
_version_ | 1782513889611612160 |
---|---|
author | Ribeiro de Paula, Demetrius Ziegler, Erik Abeyasinghe, Pubuditha M. Das, Tushar K. Cavaliere, Carlo Aiello, Marco Heine, Lizette di Perri, Carol Demertzi, Athena Noirhomme, Quentin Charland‐Verville, Vanessa Vanhaudenhuyse, Audrey Stender, Johan Gomez, Francisco Tshibanda, Jean‐Flory L. Laureys, Steven Owen, Adrian M. Soddu, Andrea |
author_facet | Ribeiro de Paula, Demetrius Ziegler, Erik Abeyasinghe, Pubuditha M. Das, Tushar K. Cavaliere, Carlo Aiello, Marco Heine, Lizette di Perri, Carol Demertzi, Athena Noirhomme, Quentin Charland‐Verville, Vanessa Vanhaudenhuyse, Audrey Stender, Johan Gomez, Francisco Tshibanda, Jean‐Flory L. Laureys, Steven Owen, Adrian M. Soddu, Andrea |
author_sort | Ribeiro de Paula, Demetrius |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Independent component analysis (ICA) has been extensively used for reducing task‐free BOLD fMRI recordings into spatial maps and their associated time‐courses. The spatially identified independent components can be considered as intrinsic connectivity networks (ICNs) of non‐contiguous regions. To date, the spatial patterns of the networks have been analyzed with techniques developed for volumetric data. OBJECTIVE: Here, we detail a graph building technique that allows these ICNs to be analyzed with graph theory. METHODS: First, ICA was performed at the single‐subject level in 15 healthy volunteers using a 3T MRI scanner. The identification of nine networks was performed by a multiple‐template matching procedure and a subsequent component classification based on the network “neuronal” properties. Second, for each of the identified networks, the nodes were defined as 1,015 anatomically parcellated regions. Third, between‐node functional connectivity was established by building edge weights for each networks. Group‐level graph analysis was finally performed for each network and compared to the classical network. RESULTS: Network graph comparison between the classically constructed network and the nine networks showed significant differences in the auditory and visual medial networks with regard to the average degree and the number of edges, while the visual lateral network showed a significant difference in the small‐worldness. CONCLUSIONS: This novel approach permits us to take advantage of the well‐recognized power of ICA in BOLD signal decomposition and, at the same time, to make use of well‐established graph measures to evaluate connectivity differences. Moreover, by providing a graph for each separate network, it can offer the possibility to extract graph measures in a specific way for each network. This increased specificity could be relevant for studying pathological brain activity or altered states of consciousness as induced by anesthesia or sleep, where specific networks are known to be altered in different strength. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5346515 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53465152017-03-14 A method for independent component graph analysis of resting‐state fMRI Ribeiro de Paula, Demetrius Ziegler, Erik Abeyasinghe, Pubuditha M. Das, Tushar K. Cavaliere, Carlo Aiello, Marco Heine, Lizette di Perri, Carol Demertzi, Athena Noirhomme, Quentin Charland‐Verville, Vanessa Vanhaudenhuyse, Audrey Stender, Johan Gomez, Francisco Tshibanda, Jean‐Flory L. Laureys, Steven Owen, Adrian M. Soddu, Andrea Brain Behav Methods INTRODUCTION: Independent component analysis (ICA) has been extensively used for reducing task‐free BOLD fMRI recordings into spatial maps and their associated time‐courses. The spatially identified independent components can be considered as intrinsic connectivity networks (ICNs) of non‐contiguous regions. To date, the spatial patterns of the networks have been analyzed with techniques developed for volumetric data. OBJECTIVE: Here, we detail a graph building technique that allows these ICNs to be analyzed with graph theory. METHODS: First, ICA was performed at the single‐subject level in 15 healthy volunteers using a 3T MRI scanner. The identification of nine networks was performed by a multiple‐template matching procedure and a subsequent component classification based on the network “neuronal” properties. Second, for each of the identified networks, the nodes were defined as 1,015 anatomically parcellated regions. Third, between‐node functional connectivity was established by building edge weights for each networks. Group‐level graph analysis was finally performed for each network and compared to the classical network. RESULTS: Network graph comparison between the classically constructed network and the nine networks showed significant differences in the auditory and visual medial networks with regard to the average degree and the number of edges, while the visual lateral network showed a significant difference in the small‐worldness. CONCLUSIONS: This novel approach permits us to take advantage of the well‐recognized power of ICA in BOLD signal decomposition and, at the same time, to make use of well‐established graph measures to evaluate connectivity differences. Moreover, by providing a graph for each separate network, it can offer the possibility to extract graph measures in a specific way for each network. This increased specificity could be relevant for studying pathological brain activity or altered states of consciousness as induced by anesthesia or sleep, where specific networks are known to be altered in different strength. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5346515/ /pubmed/28293468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.626 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methods Ribeiro de Paula, Demetrius Ziegler, Erik Abeyasinghe, Pubuditha M. Das, Tushar K. Cavaliere, Carlo Aiello, Marco Heine, Lizette di Perri, Carol Demertzi, Athena Noirhomme, Quentin Charland‐Verville, Vanessa Vanhaudenhuyse, Audrey Stender, Johan Gomez, Francisco Tshibanda, Jean‐Flory L. Laureys, Steven Owen, Adrian M. Soddu, Andrea A method for independent component graph analysis of resting‐state fMRI |
title | A method for independent component graph analysis of resting‐state fMRI
|
title_full | A method for independent component graph analysis of resting‐state fMRI
|
title_fullStr | A method for independent component graph analysis of resting‐state fMRI
|
title_full_unstemmed | A method for independent component graph analysis of resting‐state fMRI
|
title_short | A method for independent component graph analysis of resting‐state fMRI
|
title_sort | method for independent component graph analysis of resting‐state fmri |
topic | Methods |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5346515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28293468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.626 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ribeirodepaulademetrius amethodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri AT zieglererik amethodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri AT abeyasinghepubuditham amethodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri AT dastushark amethodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri AT cavalierecarlo amethodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri AT aiellomarco amethodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri AT heinelizette amethodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri AT diperricarol amethodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri AT demertziathena amethodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri AT noirhommequentin amethodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri AT charlandvervillevanessa amethodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri AT vanhaudenhuyseaudrey amethodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri AT stenderjohan amethodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri AT gomezfrancisco amethodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri AT tshibandajeanfloryl amethodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri AT laureyssteven amethodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri AT owenadrianm amethodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri AT sodduandrea amethodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri AT ribeirodepaulademetrius methodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri AT zieglererik methodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri AT abeyasinghepubuditham methodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri AT dastushark methodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri AT cavalierecarlo methodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri AT aiellomarco methodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri AT heinelizette methodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri AT diperricarol methodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri AT demertziathena methodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri AT noirhommequentin methodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri AT charlandvervillevanessa methodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri AT vanhaudenhuyseaudrey methodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri AT stenderjohan methodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri AT gomezfrancisco methodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri AT tshibandajeanfloryl methodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri AT laureyssteven methodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri AT owenadrianm methodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri AT sodduandrea methodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri |