Cargando…

A method for independent component graph analysis of resting‐state fMRI

INTRODUCTION: Independent component analysis (ICA) has been extensively used for reducing task‐free BOLD fMRI recordings into spatial maps and their associated time‐courses. The spatially identified independent components can be considered as intrinsic connectivity networks (ICNs) of non‐contiguous...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ribeiro de Paula, Demetrius, Ziegler, Erik, Abeyasinghe, Pubuditha M., Das, Tushar K., Cavaliere, Carlo, Aiello, Marco, Heine, Lizette, di Perri, Carol, Demertzi, Athena, Noirhomme, Quentin, Charland‐Verville, Vanessa, Vanhaudenhuyse, Audrey, Stender, Johan, Gomez, Francisco, Tshibanda, Jean‐Flory L., Laureys, Steven, Owen, Adrian M., Soddu, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5346515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28293468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.626
_version_ 1782513889611612160
author Ribeiro de Paula, Demetrius
Ziegler, Erik
Abeyasinghe, Pubuditha M.
Das, Tushar K.
Cavaliere, Carlo
Aiello, Marco
Heine, Lizette
di Perri, Carol
Demertzi, Athena
Noirhomme, Quentin
Charland‐Verville, Vanessa
Vanhaudenhuyse, Audrey
Stender, Johan
Gomez, Francisco
Tshibanda, Jean‐Flory L.
Laureys, Steven
Owen, Adrian M.
Soddu, Andrea
author_facet Ribeiro de Paula, Demetrius
Ziegler, Erik
Abeyasinghe, Pubuditha M.
Das, Tushar K.
Cavaliere, Carlo
Aiello, Marco
Heine, Lizette
di Perri, Carol
Demertzi, Athena
Noirhomme, Quentin
Charland‐Verville, Vanessa
Vanhaudenhuyse, Audrey
Stender, Johan
Gomez, Francisco
Tshibanda, Jean‐Flory L.
Laureys, Steven
Owen, Adrian M.
Soddu, Andrea
author_sort Ribeiro de Paula, Demetrius
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Independent component analysis (ICA) has been extensively used for reducing task‐free BOLD fMRI recordings into spatial maps and their associated time‐courses. The spatially identified independent components can be considered as intrinsic connectivity networks (ICNs) of non‐contiguous regions. To date, the spatial patterns of the networks have been analyzed with techniques developed for volumetric data. OBJECTIVE: Here, we detail a graph building technique that allows these ICNs to be analyzed with graph theory. METHODS: First, ICA was performed at the single‐subject level in 15 healthy volunteers using a 3T MRI scanner. The identification of nine networks was performed by a multiple‐template matching procedure and a subsequent component classification based on the network “neuronal” properties. Second, for each of the identified networks, the nodes were defined as 1,015 anatomically parcellated regions. Third, between‐node functional connectivity was established by building edge weights for each networks. Group‐level graph analysis was finally performed for each network and compared to the classical network. RESULTS: Network graph comparison between the classically constructed network and the nine networks showed significant differences in the auditory and visual medial networks with regard to the average degree and the number of edges, while the visual lateral network showed a significant difference in the small‐worldness. CONCLUSIONS: This novel approach permits us to take advantage of the well‐recognized power of ICA in BOLD signal decomposition and, at the same time, to make use of well‐established graph measures to evaluate connectivity differences. Moreover, by providing a graph for each separate network, it can offer the possibility to extract graph measures in a specific way for each network. This increased specificity could be relevant for studying pathological brain activity or altered states of consciousness as induced by anesthesia or sleep, where specific networks are known to be altered in different strength.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5346515
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53465152017-03-14 A method for independent component graph analysis of resting‐state fMRI Ribeiro de Paula, Demetrius Ziegler, Erik Abeyasinghe, Pubuditha M. Das, Tushar K. Cavaliere, Carlo Aiello, Marco Heine, Lizette di Perri, Carol Demertzi, Athena Noirhomme, Quentin Charland‐Verville, Vanessa Vanhaudenhuyse, Audrey Stender, Johan Gomez, Francisco Tshibanda, Jean‐Flory L. Laureys, Steven Owen, Adrian M. Soddu, Andrea Brain Behav Methods INTRODUCTION: Independent component analysis (ICA) has been extensively used for reducing task‐free BOLD fMRI recordings into spatial maps and their associated time‐courses. The spatially identified independent components can be considered as intrinsic connectivity networks (ICNs) of non‐contiguous regions. To date, the spatial patterns of the networks have been analyzed with techniques developed for volumetric data. OBJECTIVE: Here, we detail a graph building technique that allows these ICNs to be analyzed with graph theory. METHODS: First, ICA was performed at the single‐subject level in 15 healthy volunteers using a 3T MRI scanner. The identification of nine networks was performed by a multiple‐template matching procedure and a subsequent component classification based on the network “neuronal” properties. Second, for each of the identified networks, the nodes were defined as 1,015 anatomically parcellated regions. Third, between‐node functional connectivity was established by building edge weights for each networks. Group‐level graph analysis was finally performed for each network and compared to the classical network. RESULTS: Network graph comparison between the classically constructed network and the nine networks showed significant differences in the auditory and visual medial networks with regard to the average degree and the number of edges, while the visual lateral network showed a significant difference in the small‐worldness. CONCLUSIONS: This novel approach permits us to take advantage of the well‐recognized power of ICA in BOLD signal decomposition and, at the same time, to make use of well‐established graph measures to evaluate connectivity differences. Moreover, by providing a graph for each separate network, it can offer the possibility to extract graph measures in a specific way for each network. This increased specificity could be relevant for studying pathological brain activity or altered states of consciousness as induced by anesthesia or sleep, where specific networks are known to be altered in different strength. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5346515/ /pubmed/28293468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.626 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methods
Ribeiro de Paula, Demetrius
Ziegler, Erik
Abeyasinghe, Pubuditha M.
Das, Tushar K.
Cavaliere, Carlo
Aiello, Marco
Heine, Lizette
di Perri, Carol
Demertzi, Athena
Noirhomme, Quentin
Charland‐Verville, Vanessa
Vanhaudenhuyse, Audrey
Stender, Johan
Gomez, Francisco
Tshibanda, Jean‐Flory L.
Laureys, Steven
Owen, Adrian M.
Soddu, Andrea
A method for independent component graph analysis of resting‐state fMRI
title A method for independent component graph analysis of resting‐state fMRI
title_full A method for independent component graph analysis of resting‐state fMRI
title_fullStr A method for independent component graph analysis of resting‐state fMRI
title_full_unstemmed A method for independent component graph analysis of resting‐state fMRI
title_short A method for independent component graph analysis of resting‐state fMRI
title_sort method for independent component graph analysis of resting‐state fmri
topic Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5346515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28293468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.626
work_keys_str_mv AT ribeirodepaulademetrius amethodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri
AT zieglererik amethodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri
AT abeyasinghepubuditham amethodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri
AT dastushark amethodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri
AT cavalierecarlo amethodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri
AT aiellomarco amethodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri
AT heinelizette amethodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri
AT diperricarol amethodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri
AT demertziathena amethodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri
AT noirhommequentin amethodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri
AT charlandvervillevanessa amethodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri
AT vanhaudenhuyseaudrey amethodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri
AT stenderjohan amethodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri
AT gomezfrancisco amethodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri
AT tshibandajeanfloryl amethodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri
AT laureyssteven amethodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri
AT owenadrianm amethodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri
AT sodduandrea amethodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri
AT ribeirodepaulademetrius methodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri
AT zieglererik methodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri
AT abeyasinghepubuditham methodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri
AT dastushark methodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri
AT cavalierecarlo methodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri
AT aiellomarco methodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri
AT heinelizette methodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri
AT diperricarol methodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri
AT demertziathena methodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri
AT noirhommequentin methodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri
AT charlandvervillevanessa methodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri
AT vanhaudenhuyseaudrey methodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri
AT stenderjohan methodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri
AT gomezfrancisco methodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri
AT tshibandajeanfloryl methodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri
AT laureyssteven methodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri
AT owenadrianm methodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri
AT sodduandrea methodforindependentcomponentgraphanalysisofrestingstatefmri