Cargando…

Using Dual Regression to Investigate Network Shape and Amplitude in Functional Connectivity Analyses

Independent Component Analysis (ICA) is one of the most popular techniques for the analysis of resting state FMRI data because it has several advantageous properties when compared with other techniques. Most notably, in contrast to a conventional seed-based correlation analysis, it is model-free and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nickerson, Lisa D., Smith, Stephen M., Öngür, Döst, Beckmann, Christian F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5346569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28348512
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00115
_version_ 1782513902128463872
author Nickerson, Lisa D.
Smith, Stephen M.
Öngür, Döst
Beckmann, Christian F.
author_facet Nickerson, Lisa D.
Smith, Stephen M.
Öngür, Döst
Beckmann, Christian F.
author_sort Nickerson, Lisa D.
collection PubMed
description Independent Component Analysis (ICA) is one of the most popular techniques for the analysis of resting state FMRI data because it has several advantageous properties when compared with other techniques. Most notably, in contrast to a conventional seed-based correlation analysis, it is model-free and multivariate, thus switching the focus from evaluating the functional connectivity of single brain regions identified a priori to evaluating brain connectivity in terms of all brain resting state networks (RSNs) that simultaneously engage in oscillatory activity. Furthermore, typical seed-based analysis characterizes RSNs in terms of spatially distributed patterns of correlation (typically by means of simple Pearson's coefficients) and thereby confounds together amplitude information of oscillatory activity and noise. ICA and other regression techniques, on the other hand, retain magnitude information and therefore can be sensitive to both changes in the spatially distributed nature of correlations (differences in the spatial pattern or “shape”) as well as the amplitude of the network activity. Furthermore, motion can mimic amplitude effects so it is crucial to use a technique that retains such information to ensure that connectivity differences are accurately localized. In this work, we investigate the dual regression approach that is frequently applied with group ICA to assess group differences in resting state functional connectivity of brain networks. We show how ignoring amplitude effects and how excessive motion corrupts connectivity maps and results in spurious connectivity differences. We also show how to implement the dual regression to retain amplitude information and how to use dual regression outputs to identify potential motion effects. Two key findings are that using a technique that retains magnitude information, e.g., dual regression, and using strict motion criteria are crucial for controlling both network amplitude and motion-related amplitude effects, respectively, in resting state connectivity analyses. We illustrate these concepts using realistic simulated resting state FMRI data and in vivo data acquired in healthy subjects and patients with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5346569
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53465692017-03-27 Using Dual Regression to Investigate Network Shape and Amplitude in Functional Connectivity Analyses Nickerson, Lisa D. Smith, Stephen M. Öngür, Döst Beckmann, Christian F. Front Neurosci Neuroscience Independent Component Analysis (ICA) is one of the most popular techniques for the analysis of resting state FMRI data because it has several advantageous properties when compared with other techniques. Most notably, in contrast to a conventional seed-based correlation analysis, it is model-free and multivariate, thus switching the focus from evaluating the functional connectivity of single brain regions identified a priori to evaluating brain connectivity in terms of all brain resting state networks (RSNs) that simultaneously engage in oscillatory activity. Furthermore, typical seed-based analysis characterizes RSNs in terms of spatially distributed patterns of correlation (typically by means of simple Pearson's coefficients) and thereby confounds together amplitude information of oscillatory activity and noise. ICA and other regression techniques, on the other hand, retain magnitude information and therefore can be sensitive to both changes in the spatially distributed nature of correlations (differences in the spatial pattern or “shape”) as well as the amplitude of the network activity. Furthermore, motion can mimic amplitude effects so it is crucial to use a technique that retains such information to ensure that connectivity differences are accurately localized. In this work, we investigate the dual regression approach that is frequently applied with group ICA to assess group differences in resting state functional connectivity of brain networks. We show how ignoring amplitude effects and how excessive motion corrupts connectivity maps and results in spurious connectivity differences. We also show how to implement the dual regression to retain amplitude information and how to use dual regression outputs to identify potential motion effects. Two key findings are that using a technique that retains magnitude information, e.g., dual regression, and using strict motion criteria are crucial for controlling both network amplitude and motion-related amplitude effects, respectively, in resting state connectivity analyses. We illustrate these concepts using realistic simulated resting state FMRI data and in vivo data acquired in healthy subjects and patients with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5346569/ /pubmed/28348512 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00115 Text en Copyright © 2017 Nickerson, Smith, Öngür and Beckmann. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Nickerson, Lisa D.
Smith, Stephen M.
Öngür, Döst
Beckmann, Christian F.
Using Dual Regression to Investigate Network Shape and Amplitude in Functional Connectivity Analyses
title Using Dual Regression to Investigate Network Shape and Amplitude in Functional Connectivity Analyses
title_full Using Dual Regression to Investigate Network Shape and Amplitude in Functional Connectivity Analyses
title_fullStr Using Dual Regression to Investigate Network Shape and Amplitude in Functional Connectivity Analyses
title_full_unstemmed Using Dual Regression to Investigate Network Shape and Amplitude in Functional Connectivity Analyses
title_short Using Dual Regression to Investigate Network Shape and Amplitude in Functional Connectivity Analyses
title_sort using dual regression to investigate network shape and amplitude in functional connectivity analyses
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5346569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28348512
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00115
work_keys_str_mv AT nickersonlisad usingdualregressiontoinvestigatenetworkshapeandamplitudeinfunctionalconnectivityanalyses
AT smithstephenm usingdualregressiontoinvestigatenetworkshapeandamplitudeinfunctionalconnectivityanalyses
AT ongurdost usingdualregressiontoinvestigatenetworkshapeandamplitudeinfunctionalconnectivityanalyses
AT beckmannchristianf usingdualregressiontoinvestigatenetworkshapeandamplitudeinfunctionalconnectivityanalyses