Cargando…
Evaluation of Immunoassays and General Biological Indicator Tests for Field Screening of Bacillus anthracis and Ricin
There is little published data on the performance of biological indicator tests and immunoassays that could be used by first responders to determine if a suspicious powder contains a potential biothreat agent. We evaluated a range of biological indicator tests, including 3 protein tests, 2 ATP tests...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5346815/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28192054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/hs.2016.0044 |
_version_ | 1782513958417072128 |
---|---|
author | Bartholomew, Rachel A. Ozanich, Richard M. Arce, Jennifer S. Engelmann, Heather E. Heredia-Langner, Alejandro Hofstad, Beth A. Hutchison, Janine R. Jarman, Kristin Melville, Angela M. Victry, Kristin D. Bruckner-Lea, Cynthia J. |
author_facet | Bartholomew, Rachel A. Ozanich, Richard M. Arce, Jennifer S. Engelmann, Heather E. Heredia-Langner, Alejandro Hofstad, Beth A. Hutchison, Janine R. Jarman, Kristin Melville, Angela M. Victry, Kristin D. Bruckner-Lea, Cynthia J. |
author_sort | Bartholomew, Rachel A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is little published data on the performance of biological indicator tests and immunoassays that could be used by first responders to determine if a suspicious powder contains a potential biothreat agent. We evaluated a range of biological indicator tests, including 3 protein tests, 2 ATP tests, 1 DNA test, and 1 FTIR spectroscopy instrument for their ability to screen suspicious powders for Bacillus anthracis (B. anthracis) spores and ricin. We also evaluated 12 immunoassays (mostly lateral flow immunoassays) for their ability to screen for B. anthracis and ricin. We used a cost-effective, statistically based test plan that allows instruments to be evaluated at performance levels ranging from 0.85 to 0.95 lower confidence bound of the probability of detection at confidence levels of 80% to 95%. We also assessed interference with 22 common suspicious powders encountered in the field. The detection reproducibility for the biological indicators was evaluated at 10(8) B. anthracis spores and 62.5 μg ricin, and the immunoassay detection reproducibility was evaluated at 10(7) spores/mL (B. anthracis) and 0.1 μg/mL (ricin). Seven out of 12 immunoassays met our most stringent criteria for B. anthracis detection, while 9 out of 12 met our most stringent test criteria for ricin detection. Most of the immunoassays also detected ricin in 3 different crude castor seed preparations. Our testing results varied across products and sample preparations, indicating the importance of reviewing performance data for specific instruments and sample types of interest for the application in order to make informed decisions regarding the selection of biodetection equipment for field use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5346815 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53468152017-03-13 Evaluation of Immunoassays and General Biological Indicator Tests for Field Screening of Bacillus anthracis and Ricin Bartholomew, Rachel A. Ozanich, Richard M. Arce, Jennifer S. Engelmann, Heather E. Heredia-Langner, Alejandro Hofstad, Beth A. Hutchison, Janine R. Jarman, Kristin Melville, Angela M. Victry, Kristin D. Bruckner-Lea, Cynthia J. Health Secur Original Articles There is little published data on the performance of biological indicator tests and immunoassays that could be used by first responders to determine if a suspicious powder contains a potential biothreat agent. We evaluated a range of biological indicator tests, including 3 protein tests, 2 ATP tests, 1 DNA test, and 1 FTIR spectroscopy instrument for their ability to screen suspicious powders for Bacillus anthracis (B. anthracis) spores and ricin. We also evaluated 12 immunoassays (mostly lateral flow immunoassays) for their ability to screen for B. anthracis and ricin. We used a cost-effective, statistically based test plan that allows instruments to be evaluated at performance levels ranging from 0.85 to 0.95 lower confidence bound of the probability of detection at confidence levels of 80% to 95%. We also assessed interference with 22 common suspicious powders encountered in the field. The detection reproducibility for the biological indicators was evaluated at 10(8) B. anthracis spores and 62.5 μg ricin, and the immunoassay detection reproducibility was evaluated at 10(7) spores/mL (B. anthracis) and 0.1 μg/mL (ricin). Seven out of 12 immunoassays met our most stringent criteria for B. anthracis detection, while 9 out of 12 met our most stringent test criteria for ricin detection. Most of the immunoassays also detected ricin in 3 different crude castor seed preparations. Our testing results varied across products and sample preparations, indicating the importance of reviewing performance data for specific instruments and sample types of interest for the application in order to make informed decisions regarding the selection of biodetection equipment for field use. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2017-02-01 2017-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5346815/ /pubmed/28192054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/hs.2016.0044 Text en © Rachel A. Bartholomew et al., 2017; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Bartholomew, Rachel A. Ozanich, Richard M. Arce, Jennifer S. Engelmann, Heather E. Heredia-Langner, Alejandro Hofstad, Beth A. Hutchison, Janine R. Jarman, Kristin Melville, Angela M. Victry, Kristin D. Bruckner-Lea, Cynthia J. Evaluation of Immunoassays and General Biological Indicator Tests for Field Screening of Bacillus anthracis and Ricin |
title | Evaluation of Immunoassays and General Biological Indicator Tests for Field Screening of Bacillus anthracis and Ricin |
title_full | Evaluation of Immunoassays and General Biological Indicator Tests for Field Screening of Bacillus anthracis and Ricin |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Immunoassays and General Biological Indicator Tests for Field Screening of Bacillus anthracis and Ricin |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Immunoassays and General Biological Indicator Tests for Field Screening of Bacillus anthracis and Ricin |
title_short | Evaluation of Immunoassays and General Biological Indicator Tests for Field Screening of Bacillus anthracis and Ricin |
title_sort | evaluation of immunoassays and general biological indicator tests for field screening of bacillus anthracis and ricin |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5346815/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28192054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/hs.2016.0044 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bartholomewrachela evaluationofimmunoassaysandgeneralbiologicalindicatortestsforfieldscreeningofbacillusanthracisandricin AT ozanichrichardm evaluationofimmunoassaysandgeneralbiologicalindicatortestsforfieldscreeningofbacillusanthracisandricin AT arcejennifers evaluationofimmunoassaysandgeneralbiologicalindicatortestsforfieldscreeningofbacillusanthracisandricin AT engelmannheathere evaluationofimmunoassaysandgeneralbiologicalindicatortestsforfieldscreeningofbacillusanthracisandricin AT heredialangneralejandro evaluationofimmunoassaysandgeneralbiologicalindicatortestsforfieldscreeningofbacillusanthracisandricin AT hofstadbetha evaluationofimmunoassaysandgeneralbiologicalindicatortestsforfieldscreeningofbacillusanthracisandricin AT hutchisonjaniner evaluationofimmunoassaysandgeneralbiologicalindicatortestsforfieldscreeningofbacillusanthracisandricin AT jarmankristin evaluationofimmunoassaysandgeneralbiologicalindicatortestsforfieldscreeningofbacillusanthracisandricin AT melvilleangelam evaluationofimmunoassaysandgeneralbiologicalindicatortestsforfieldscreeningofbacillusanthracisandricin AT victrykristind evaluationofimmunoassaysandgeneralbiologicalindicatortestsforfieldscreeningofbacillusanthracisandricin AT brucknerleacynthiaj evaluationofimmunoassaysandgeneralbiologicalindicatortestsforfieldscreeningofbacillusanthracisandricin |