Cargando…

Evaluation of Immunoassays and General Biological Indicator Tests for Field Screening of Bacillus anthracis and Ricin

There is little published data on the performance of biological indicator tests and immunoassays that could be used by first responders to determine if a suspicious powder contains a potential biothreat agent. We evaluated a range of biological indicator tests, including 3 protein tests, 2 ATP tests...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bartholomew, Rachel A., Ozanich, Richard M., Arce, Jennifer S., Engelmann, Heather E., Heredia-Langner, Alejandro, Hofstad, Beth A., Hutchison, Janine R., Jarman, Kristin, Melville, Angela M., Victry, Kristin D., Bruckner-Lea, Cynthia J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5346815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28192054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/hs.2016.0044
_version_ 1782513958417072128
author Bartholomew, Rachel A.
Ozanich, Richard M.
Arce, Jennifer S.
Engelmann, Heather E.
Heredia-Langner, Alejandro
Hofstad, Beth A.
Hutchison, Janine R.
Jarman, Kristin
Melville, Angela M.
Victry, Kristin D.
Bruckner-Lea, Cynthia J.
author_facet Bartholomew, Rachel A.
Ozanich, Richard M.
Arce, Jennifer S.
Engelmann, Heather E.
Heredia-Langner, Alejandro
Hofstad, Beth A.
Hutchison, Janine R.
Jarman, Kristin
Melville, Angela M.
Victry, Kristin D.
Bruckner-Lea, Cynthia J.
author_sort Bartholomew, Rachel A.
collection PubMed
description There is little published data on the performance of biological indicator tests and immunoassays that could be used by first responders to determine if a suspicious powder contains a potential biothreat agent. We evaluated a range of biological indicator tests, including 3 protein tests, 2 ATP tests, 1 DNA test, and 1 FTIR spectroscopy instrument for their ability to screen suspicious powders for Bacillus anthracis (B. anthracis) spores and ricin. We also evaluated 12 immunoassays (mostly lateral flow immunoassays) for their ability to screen for B. anthracis and ricin. We used a cost-effective, statistically based test plan that allows instruments to be evaluated at performance levels ranging from 0.85 to 0.95 lower confidence bound of the probability of detection at confidence levels of 80% to 95%. We also assessed interference with 22 common suspicious powders encountered in the field. The detection reproducibility for the biological indicators was evaluated at 10(8) B. anthracis spores and 62.5 μg ricin, and the immunoassay detection reproducibility was evaluated at 10(7) spores/mL (B. anthracis) and 0.1 μg/mL (ricin). Seven out of 12 immunoassays met our most stringent criteria for B. anthracis detection, while 9 out of 12 met our most stringent test criteria for ricin detection. Most of the immunoassays also detected ricin in 3 different crude castor seed preparations. Our testing results varied across products and sample preparations, indicating the importance of reviewing performance data for specific instruments and sample types of interest for the application in order to make informed decisions regarding the selection of biodetection equipment for field use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5346815
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53468152017-03-13 Evaluation of Immunoassays and General Biological Indicator Tests for Field Screening of Bacillus anthracis and Ricin Bartholomew, Rachel A. Ozanich, Richard M. Arce, Jennifer S. Engelmann, Heather E. Heredia-Langner, Alejandro Hofstad, Beth A. Hutchison, Janine R. Jarman, Kristin Melville, Angela M. Victry, Kristin D. Bruckner-Lea, Cynthia J. Health Secur Original Articles There is little published data on the performance of biological indicator tests and immunoassays that could be used by first responders to determine if a suspicious powder contains a potential biothreat agent. We evaluated a range of biological indicator tests, including 3 protein tests, 2 ATP tests, 1 DNA test, and 1 FTIR spectroscopy instrument for their ability to screen suspicious powders for Bacillus anthracis (B. anthracis) spores and ricin. We also evaluated 12 immunoassays (mostly lateral flow immunoassays) for their ability to screen for B. anthracis and ricin. We used a cost-effective, statistically based test plan that allows instruments to be evaluated at performance levels ranging from 0.85 to 0.95 lower confidence bound of the probability of detection at confidence levels of 80% to 95%. We also assessed interference with 22 common suspicious powders encountered in the field. The detection reproducibility for the biological indicators was evaluated at 10(8) B. anthracis spores and 62.5 μg ricin, and the immunoassay detection reproducibility was evaluated at 10(7) spores/mL (B. anthracis) and 0.1 μg/mL (ricin). Seven out of 12 immunoassays met our most stringent criteria for B. anthracis detection, while 9 out of 12 met our most stringent test criteria for ricin detection. Most of the immunoassays also detected ricin in 3 different crude castor seed preparations. Our testing results varied across products and sample preparations, indicating the importance of reviewing performance data for specific instruments and sample types of interest for the application in order to make informed decisions regarding the selection of biodetection equipment for field use. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2017-02-01 2017-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5346815/ /pubmed/28192054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/hs.2016.0044 Text en © Rachel A. Bartholomew et al., 2017; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Bartholomew, Rachel A.
Ozanich, Richard M.
Arce, Jennifer S.
Engelmann, Heather E.
Heredia-Langner, Alejandro
Hofstad, Beth A.
Hutchison, Janine R.
Jarman, Kristin
Melville, Angela M.
Victry, Kristin D.
Bruckner-Lea, Cynthia J.
Evaluation of Immunoassays and General Biological Indicator Tests for Field Screening of Bacillus anthracis and Ricin
title Evaluation of Immunoassays and General Biological Indicator Tests for Field Screening of Bacillus anthracis and Ricin
title_full Evaluation of Immunoassays and General Biological Indicator Tests for Field Screening of Bacillus anthracis and Ricin
title_fullStr Evaluation of Immunoassays and General Biological Indicator Tests for Field Screening of Bacillus anthracis and Ricin
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Immunoassays and General Biological Indicator Tests for Field Screening of Bacillus anthracis and Ricin
title_short Evaluation of Immunoassays and General Biological Indicator Tests for Field Screening of Bacillus anthracis and Ricin
title_sort evaluation of immunoassays and general biological indicator tests for field screening of bacillus anthracis and ricin
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5346815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28192054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/hs.2016.0044
work_keys_str_mv AT bartholomewrachela evaluationofimmunoassaysandgeneralbiologicalindicatortestsforfieldscreeningofbacillusanthracisandricin
AT ozanichrichardm evaluationofimmunoassaysandgeneralbiologicalindicatortestsforfieldscreeningofbacillusanthracisandricin
AT arcejennifers evaluationofimmunoassaysandgeneralbiologicalindicatortestsforfieldscreeningofbacillusanthracisandricin
AT engelmannheathere evaluationofimmunoassaysandgeneralbiologicalindicatortestsforfieldscreeningofbacillusanthracisandricin
AT heredialangneralejandro evaluationofimmunoassaysandgeneralbiologicalindicatortestsforfieldscreeningofbacillusanthracisandricin
AT hofstadbetha evaluationofimmunoassaysandgeneralbiologicalindicatortestsforfieldscreeningofbacillusanthracisandricin
AT hutchisonjaniner evaluationofimmunoassaysandgeneralbiologicalindicatortestsforfieldscreeningofbacillusanthracisandricin
AT jarmankristin evaluationofimmunoassaysandgeneralbiologicalindicatortestsforfieldscreeningofbacillusanthracisandricin
AT melvilleangelam evaluationofimmunoassaysandgeneralbiologicalindicatortestsforfieldscreeningofbacillusanthracisandricin
AT victrykristind evaluationofimmunoassaysandgeneralbiologicalindicatortestsforfieldscreeningofbacillusanthracisandricin
AT brucknerleacynthiaj evaluationofimmunoassaysandgeneralbiologicalindicatortestsforfieldscreeningofbacillusanthracisandricin