Cargando…

Serological evidence of exposure to Rickettsia felis and Rickettsia typhi in Australian veterinarians

BACKGROUND: Rickettsia felis and Rickettsia typhi are emerging arthropod-borne zoonoses causing fever and flu-like symptoms. Seroprevalence and risk factors associated with exposure to these organisms was explored in Australian veterinarians. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-one veterinarians from ac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Teoh, Yen Thon, Hii, Sze Fui, Stevenson, Mark A., Graves, Stephen, Rees, Robert, Stenos, John, Traub, Rebecca J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5346837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28285586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2075-y
_version_ 1782513963494277120
author Teoh, Yen Thon
Hii, Sze Fui
Stevenson, Mark A.
Graves, Stephen
Rees, Robert
Stenos, John
Traub, Rebecca J.
author_facet Teoh, Yen Thon
Hii, Sze Fui
Stevenson, Mark A.
Graves, Stephen
Rees, Robert
Stenos, John
Traub, Rebecca J.
author_sort Teoh, Yen Thon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rickettsia felis and Rickettsia typhi are emerging arthropod-borne zoonoses causing fever and flu-like symptoms. Seroprevalence and risk factors associated with exposure to these organisms was explored in Australian veterinarians. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-one veterinarians from across Australia were recruited to participate in a cross-sectional survey. Veterinarians provided a single blood sample and answered a questionnaire on potential risk factors influencing their exposure to R. felis and R. typhi. Indirect microimmunofluorescence antibody testing (IFAT) was used to identify evidence of serological exposure of the participants to R. felis and R. typhi. Results were analyzed and a logistical regression model performed to predict risk factors associated with seropositivity. RESULTS: In total, 16.0% of participants were seropositive to R. felis, 4.6% to R. typhi and 35.1% seropositive to both, where cross-reactivity of the IFAT between R. felis and R. typhi precluded a definitive diagnosis. Veterinarians residing within the south-eastern states of Victoria and Tasmania were at a higher risk of exposure to R. felis or generalised R. felis or R. typhi exposure. Older veterinarians and those that recommended flea treatment to their clients were found to be significantly protected from exposure. CONCLUSIONS: The high exposure to R. felis amongst veterinary professionals suggests that flea-borne spotted fever is an important cause of undifferentiated fever conditions that may not be adequately recognized in Australia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5346837
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53468372017-03-14 Serological evidence of exposure to Rickettsia felis and Rickettsia typhi in Australian veterinarians Teoh, Yen Thon Hii, Sze Fui Stevenson, Mark A. Graves, Stephen Rees, Robert Stenos, John Traub, Rebecca J. Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: Rickettsia felis and Rickettsia typhi are emerging arthropod-borne zoonoses causing fever and flu-like symptoms. Seroprevalence and risk factors associated with exposure to these organisms was explored in Australian veterinarians. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-one veterinarians from across Australia were recruited to participate in a cross-sectional survey. Veterinarians provided a single blood sample and answered a questionnaire on potential risk factors influencing their exposure to R. felis and R. typhi. Indirect microimmunofluorescence antibody testing (IFAT) was used to identify evidence of serological exposure of the participants to R. felis and R. typhi. Results were analyzed and a logistical regression model performed to predict risk factors associated with seropositivity. RESULTS: In total, 16.0% of participants were seropositive to R. felis, 4.6% to R. typhi and 35.1% seropositive to both, where cross-reactivity of the IFAT between R. felis and R. typhi precluded a definitive diagnosis. Veterinarians residing within the south-eastern states of Victoria and Tasmania were at a higher risk of exposure to R. felis or generalised R. felis or R. typhi exposure. Older veterinarians and those that recommended flea treatment to their clients were found to be significantly protected from exposure. CONCLUSIONS: The high exposure to R. felis amongst veterinary professionals suggests that flea-borne spotted fever is an important cause of undifferentiated fever conditions that may not be adequately recognized in Australia. BioMed Central 2017-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5346837/ /pubmed/28285586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2075-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Teoh, Yen Thon
Hii, Sze Fui
Stevenson, Mark A.
Graves, Stephen
Rees, Robert
Stenos, John
Traub, Rebecca J.
Serological evidence of exposure to Rickettsia felis and Rickettsia typhi in Australian veterinarians
title Serological evidence of exposure to Rickettsia felis and Rickettsia typhi in Australian veterinarians
title_full Serological evidence of exposure to Rickettsia felis and Rickettsia typhi in Australian veterinarians
title_fullStr Serological evidence of exposure to Rickettsia felis and Rickettsia typhi in Australian veterinarians
title_full_unstemmed Serological evidence of exposure to Rickettsia felis and Rickettsia typhi in Australian veterinarians
title_short Serological evidence of exposure to Rickettsia felis and Rickettsia typhi in Australian veterinarians
title_sort serological evidence of exposure to rickettsia felis and rickettsia typhi in australian veterinarians
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5346837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28285586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2075-y
work_keys_str_mv AT teohyenthon serologicalevidenceofexposuretorickettsiafelisandrickettsiatyphiinaustralianveterinarians
AT hiiszefui serologicalevidenceofexposuretorickettsiafelisandrickettsiatyphiinaustralianveterinarians
AT stevensonmarka serologicalevidenceofexposuretorickettsiafelisandrickettsiatyphiinaustralianveterinarians
AT gravesstephen serologicalevidenceofexposuretorickettsiafelisandrickettsiatyphiinaustralianveterinarians
AT reesrobert serologicalevidenceofexposuretorickettsiafelisandrickettsiatyphiinaustralianveterinarians
AT stenosjohn serologicalevidenceofexposuretorickettsiafelisandrickettsiatyphiinaustralianveterinarians
AT traubrebeccaj serologicalevidenceofexposuretorickettsiafelisandrickettsiatyphiinaustralianveterinarians