Cargando…
Serological evidence of exposure to Rickettsia felis and Rickettsia typhi in Australian veterinarians
BACKGROUND: Rickettsia felis and Rickettsia typhi are emerging arthropod-borne zoonoses causing fever and flu-like symptoms. Seroprevalence and risk factors associated with exposure to these organisms was explored in Australian veterinarians. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-one veterinarians from ac...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5346837/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28285586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2075-y |
_version_ | 1782513963494277120 |
---|---|
author | Teoh, Yen Thon Hii, Sze Fui Stevenson, Mark A. Graves, Stephen Rees, Robert Stenos, John Traub, Rebecca J. |
author_facet | Teoh, Yen Thon Hii, Sze Fui Stevenson, Mark A. Graves, Stephen Rees, Robert Stenos, John Traub, Rebecca J. |
author_sort | Teoh, Yen Thon |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Rickettsia felis and Rickettsia typhi are emerging arthropod-borne zoonoses causing fever and flu-like symptoms. Seroprevalence and risk factors associated with exposure to these organisms was explored in Australian veterinarians. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-one veterinarians from across Australia were recruited to participate in a cross-sectional survey. Veterinarians provided a single blood sample and answered a questionnaire on potential risk factors influencing their exposure to R. felis and R. typhi. Indirect microimmunofluorescence antibody testing (IFAT) was used to identify evidence of serological exposure of the participants to R. felis and R. typhi. Results were analyzed and a logistical regression model performed to predict risk factors associated with seropositivity. RESULTS: In total, 16.0% of participants were seropositive to R. felis, 4.6% to R. typhi and 35.1% seropositive to both, where cross-reactivity of the IFAT between R. felis and R. typhi precluded a definitive diagnosis. Veterinarians residing within the south-eastern states of Victoria and Tasmania were at a higher risk of exposure to R. felis or generalised R. felis or R. typhi exposure. Older veterinarians and those that recommended flea treatment to their clients were found to be significantly protected from exposure. CONCLUSIONS: The high exposure to R. felis amongst veterinary professionals suggests that flea-borne spotted fever is an important cause of undifferentiated fever conditions that may not be adequately recognized in Australia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5346837 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53468372017-03-14 Serological evidence of exposure to Rickettsia felis and Rickettsia typhi in Australian veterinarians Teoh, Yen Thon Hii, Sze Fui Stevenson, Mark A. Graves, Stephen Rees, Robert Stenos, John Traub, Rebecca J. Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: Rickettsia felis and Rickettsia typhi are emerging arthropod-borne zoonoses causing fever and flu-like symptoms. Seroprevalence and risk factors associated with exposure to these organisms was explored in Australian veterinarians. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-one veterinarians from across Australia were recruited to participate in a cross-sectional survey. Veterinarians provided a single blood sample and answered a questionnaire on potential risk factors influencing their exposure to R. felis and R. typhi. Indirect microimmunofluorescence antibody testing (IFAT) was used to identify evidence of serological exposure of the participants to R. felis and R. typhi. Results were analyzed and a logistical regression model performed to predict risk factors associated with seropositivity. RESULTS: In total, 16.0% of participants were seropositive to R. felis, 4.6% to R. typhi and 35.1% seropositive to both, where cross-reactivity of the IFAT between R. felis and R. typhi precluded a definitive diagnosis. Veterinarians residing within the south-eastern states of Victoria and Tasmania were at a higher risk of exposure to R. felis or generalised R. felis or R. typhi exposure. Older veterinarians and those that recommended flea treatment to their clients were found to be significantly protected from exposure. CONCLUSIONS: The high exposure to R. felis amongst veterinary professionals suggests that flea-borne spotted fever is an important cause of undifferentiated fever conditions that may not be adequately recognized in Australia. BioMed Central 2017-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5346837/ /pubmed/28285586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2075-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Teoh, Yen Thon Hii, Sze Fui Stevenson, Mark A. Graves, Stephen Rees, Robert Stenos, John Traub, Rebecca J. Serological evidence of exposure to Rickettsia felis and Rickettsia typhi in Australian veterinarians |
title | Serological evidence of exposure to Rickettsia felis and Rickettsia typhi in Australian veterinarians |
title_full | Serological evidence of exposure to Rickettsia felis and Rickettsia typhi in Australian veterinarians |
title_fullStr | Serological evidence of exposure to Rickettsia felis and Rickettsia typhi in Australian veterinarians |
title_full_unstemmed | Serological evidence of exposure to Rickettsia felis and Rickettsia typhi in Australian veterinarians |
title_short | Serological evidence of exposure to Rickettsia felis and Rickettsia typhi in Australian veterinarians |
title_sort | serological evidence of exposure to rickettsia felis and rickettsia typhi in australian veterinarians |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5346837/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28285586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2075-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT teohyenthon serologicalevidenceofexposuretorickettsiafelisandrickettsiatyphiinaustralianveterinarians AT hiiszefui serologicalevidenceofexposuretorickettsiafelisandrickettsiatyphiinaustralianveterinarians AT stevensonmarka serologicalevidenceofexposuretorickettsiafelisandrickettsiatyphiinaustralianveterinarians AT gravesstephen serologicalevidenceofexposuretorickettsiafelisandrickettsiatyphiinaustralianveterinarians AT reesrobert serologicalevidenceofexposuretorickettsiafelisandrickettsiatyphiinaustralianveterinarians AT stenosjohn serologicalevidenceofexposuretorickettsiafelisandrickettsiatyphiinaustralianveterinarians AT traubrebeccaj serologicalevidenceofexposuretorickettsiafelisandrickettsiatyphiinaustralianveterinarians |