Cargando…
Diagnostic performance of ELISA, IFAT and Western blot for the detection of anti-Leishmania infantum antibodies in cats using a Bayesian analysis without a gold standard
BACKGROUND: Anti-Leishmania antibodies are increasingly investigated in cats for epidemiological studies or for the diagnosis of clinical feline leishmaniosis. The immunofluorescent antibody test (IFAT), the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and western blot (WB) are the serological tests mo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5346856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28285598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2046-3 |
_version_ | 1782513968140517376 |
---|---|
author | Persichetti, Maria Flaminia Solano-Gallego, Laia Vullo, Angela Masucci, Marisa Marty, Pierre Delaunay, Pascal Vitale, Fabrizio Pennisi, Maria Grazia |
author_facet | Persichetti, Maria Flaminia Solano-Gallego, Laia Vullo, Angela Masucci, Marisa Marty, Pierre Delaunay, Pascal Vitale, Fabrizio Pennisi, Maria Grazia |
author_sort | Persichetti, Maria Flaminia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Anti-Leishmania antibodies are increasingly investigated in cats for epidemiological studies or for the diagnosis of clinical feline leishmaniosis. The immunofluorescent antibody test (IFAT), the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and western blot (WB) are the serological tests more frequently used. The aim of the present study was to assess diagnostic performance of IFAT, ELISA and WB to detect anti-L. infantum antibodies in feline serum samples obtained from endemic (n = 76) and non-endemic (n = 64) areas and from cats affected by feline leishmaniosis (n = 21) by a Bayesian approach without a gold standard. METHODS: Cut-offs were set at 80 titre for IFAT and 40 ELISA units for ELISA. WB was considered positive in presence of at least a 18 KDa band. Statistical analysis was performed through a written routine with MATLAB software in the Bayesian framework. The latent data and observations from the joint posterior were simulated in the Bayesian approach by an iterative Markov Chain Monte Carlo technique using the Gibbs sampler for estimating sensitivity and specificity of the three tests. RESULTS: The median seroprevalence in the sample used for evaluating the performance of tests was estimated at 0.27 [credible interval (CI) = 0.20–0.34]. The median sensitivity of the three different methods was 0.97 (CI: 0.86–1.00), 0.75 (CI: 0.61–0.87) and 0.70 (CI: 0.56–0.83) for WB, IFAT and ELISA, respectively. Median specificity reached 0.99 (CI: 0.96–1.00) with WB, 0.97 (CI: 0.93–0.99) with IFAT and 0.98 (CI: 0.94–1.00) with ELISA. IFAT was more sensitive than ELISA (75 vs 70%) for the detection of subclinical infection while ELISA was better for diagnosing clinical leishmaniosis when compared with IFAT (98 vs 97%). CONCLUSIONS: The overall performance of all serological techniques was good and the most accurate test for anti-Leishmania antibody detection in feline serum samples was WB. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5346856 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53468562017-03-14 Diagnostic performance of ELISA, IFAT and Western blot for the detection of anti-Leishmania infantum antibodies in cats using a Bayesian analysis without a gold standard Persichetti, Maria Flaminia Solano-Gallego, Laia Vullo, Angela Masucci, Marisa Marty, Pierre Delaunay, Pascal Vitale, Fabrizio Pennisi, Maria Grazia Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: Anti-Leishmania antibodies are increasingly investigated in cats for epidemiological studies or for the diagnosis of clinical feline leishmaniosis. The immunofluorescent antibody test (IFAT), the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and western blot (WB) are the serological tests more frequently used. The aim of the present study was to assess diagnostic performance of IFAT, ELISA and WB to detect anti-L. infantum antibodies in feline serum samples obtained from endemic (n = 76) and non-endemic (n = 64) areas and from cats affected by feline leishmaniosis (n = 21) by a Bayesian approach without a gold standard. METHODS: Cut-offs were set at 80 titre for IFAT and 40 ELISA units for ELISA. WB was considered positive in presence of at least a 18 KDa band. Statistical analysis was performed through a written routine with MATLAB software in the Bayesian framework. The latent data and observations from the joint posterior were simulated in the Bayesian approach by an iterative Markov Chain Monte Carlo technique using the Gibbs sampler for estimating sensitivity and specificity of the three tests. RESULTS: The median seroprevalence in the sample used for evaluating the performance of tests was estimated at 0.27 [credible interval (CI) = 0.20–0.34]. The median sensitivity of the three different methods was 0.97 (CI: 0.86–1.00), 0.75 (CI: 0.61–0.87) and 0.70 (CI: 0.56–0.83) for WB, IFAT and ELISA, respectively. Median specificity reached 0.99 (CI: 0.96–1.00) with WB, 0.97 (CI: 0.93–0.99) with IFAT and 0.98 (CI: 0.94–1.00) with ELISA. IFAT was more sensitive than ELISA (75 vs 70%) for the detection of subclinical infection while ELISA was better for diagnosing clinical leishmaniosis when compared with IFAT (98 vs 97%). CONCLUSIONS: The overall performance of all serological techniques was good and the most accurate test for anti-Leishmania antibody detection in feline serum samples was WB. BioMed Central 2017-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5346856/ /pubmed/28285598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2046-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Persichetti, Maria Flaminia Solano-Gallego, Laia Vullo, Angela Masucci, Marisa Marty, Pierre Delaunay, Pascal Vitale, Fabrizio Pennisi, Maria Grazia Diagnostic performance of ELISA, IFAT and Western blot for the detection of anti-Leishmania infantum antibodies in cats using a Bayesian analysis without a gold standard |
title | Diagnostic performance of ELISA, IFAT and Western blot for the detection of anti-Leishmania infantum antibodies in cats using a Bayesian analysis without a gold standard |
title_full | Diagnostic performance of ELISA, IFAT and Western blot for the detection of anti-Leishmania infantum antibodies in cats using a Bayesian analysis without a gold standard |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic performance of ELISA, IFAT and Western blot for the detection of anti-Leishmania infantum antibodies in cats using a Bayesian analysis without a gold standard |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic performance of ELISA, IFAT and Western blot for the detection of anti-Leishmania infantum antibodies in cats using a Bayesian analysis without a gold standard |
title_short | Diagnostic performance of ELISA, IFAT and Western blot for the detection of anti-Leishmania infantum antibodies in cats using a Bayesian analysis without a gold standard |
title_sort | diagnostic performance of elisa, ifat and western blot for the detection of anti-leishmania infantum antibodies in cats using a bayesian analysis without a gold standard |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5346856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28285598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2046-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT persichettimariaflaminia diagnosticperformanceofelisaifatandwesternblotforthedetectionofantileishmaniainfantumantibodiesincatsusingabayesiananalysiswithoutagoldstandard AT solanogallegolaia diagnosticperformanceofelisaifatandwesternblotforthedetectionofantileishmaniainfantumantibodiesincatsusingabayesiananalysiswithoutagoldstandard AT vulloangela diagnosticperformanceofelisaifatandwesternblotforthedetectionofantileishmaniainfantumantibodiesincatsusingabayesiananalysiswithoutagoldstandard AT masuccimarisa diagnosticperformanceofelisaifatandwesternblotforthedetectionofantileishmaniainfantumantibodiesincatsusingabayesiananalysiswithoutagoldstandard AT martypierre diagnosticperformanceofelisaifatandwesternblotforthedetectionofantileishmaniainfantumantibodiesincatsusingabayesiananalysiswithoutagoldstandard AT delaunaypascal diagnosticperformanceofelisaifatandwesternblotforthedetectionofantileishmaniainfantumantibodiesincatsusingabayesiananalysiswithoutagoldstandard AT vitalefabrizio diagnosticperformanceofelisaifatandwesternblotforthedetectionofantileishmaniainfantumantibodiesincatsusingabayesiananalysiswithoutagoldstandard AT pennisimariagrazia diagnosticperformanceofelisaifatandwesternblotforthedetectionofantileishmaniainfantumantibodiesincatsusingabayesiananalysiswithoutagoldstandard |