Cargando…

The EUROPEP questionnaire for patient’s evaluation of general practice care: Bulgarian experience

AIM: To validate the Bulgarian EUROPEP-questionnaire and its implementation to measure patient evaluation of general practice care in Bulgarian population. METHODS: A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted at twenty five primary care practices from South-Central Region of Bulgaria. A total...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dimova, Rositsa, Stoyanova, Rumyana, Keskinova, Donka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Croatian Medical Schools 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5346897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28252877
http://dx.doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2017.58.63
Descripción
Sumario:AIM: To validate the Bulgarian EUROPEP-questionnaire and its implementation to measure patient evaluation of general practice care in Bulgarian population. METHODS: A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted at twenty five primary care practices from South-Central Region of Bulgaria. A total of 1000 adult patients aged over 18 years and visiting the practice for more than a year were approached consecutively to take part in the study. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the EUROPEP questionnaire were evaluated. To confirm the construct validity of the questionniare, еxplanatory factor analysis was performed. RESULTS: Cronbach’alpha for “clinical behaviour” is 0.95 and for “organisation of care” 0.81. Factor analysis identifed two factors, which accounted for 77.0% of the total variation in these items. On average, 58.7% of respondents rated the level of care received as excellent. The waiting time in the waiting room was the item most poorly rated (33.8%). The item “keeping patients' records and data confidential” was the most highly rated (88.8%). Patients were less satisfied with “providing quick services for urgent health problems” (78.5% excellent or good) and “getting an appropriate for them appointment” (76.2% excellent or good). CONCLUSION: Two scales with satisfactory psychometric properties were established in the Bulgarian version of the EUROPEP-questionnaire. The study identified areas requiring improvement in general practice, such as reduction in waiting times and obtaining patient’s convenience appointment.