Cargando…

The EUROPEP questionnaire for patient’s evaluation of general practice care: Bulgarian experience

AIM: To validate the Bulgarian EUROPEP-questionnaire and its implementation to measure patient evaluation of general practice care in Bulgarian population. METHODS: A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted at twenty five primary care practices from South-Central Region of Bulgaria. A total...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dimova, Rositsa, Stoyanova, Rumyana, Keskinova, Donka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Croatian Medical Schools 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5346897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28252877
http://dx.doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2017.58.63
_version_ 1782513972051705856
author Dimova, Rositsa
Stoyanova, Rumyana
Keskinova, Donka
author_facet Dimova, Rositsa
Stoyanova, Rumyana
Keskinova, Donka
author_sort Dimova, Rositsa
collection PubMed
description AIM: To validate the Bulgarian EUROPEP-questionnaire and its implementation to measure patient evaluation of general practice care in Bulgarian population. METHODS: A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted at twenty five primary care practices from South-Central Region of Bulgaria. A total of 1000 adult patients aged over 18 years and visiting the practice for more than a year were approached consecutively to take part in the study. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the EUROPEP questionnaire were evaluated. To confirm the construct validity of the questionniare, еxplanatory factor analysis was performed. RESULTS: Cronbach’alpha for “clinical behaviour” is 0.95 and for “organisation of care” 0.81. Factor analysis identifed two factors, which accounted for 77.0% of the total variation in these items. On average, 58.7% of respondents rated the level of care received as excellent. The waiting time in the waiting room was the item most poorly rated (33.8%). The item “keeping patients' records and data confidential” was the most highly rated (88.8%). Patients were less satisfied with “providing quick services for urgent health problems” (78.5% excellent or good) and “getting an appropriate for them appointment” (76.2% excellent or good). CONCLUSION: Two scales with satisfactory psychometric properties were established in the Bulgarian version of the EUROPEP-questionnaire. The study identified areas requiring improvement in general practice, such as reduction in waiting times and obtaining patient’s convenience appointment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5346897
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Croatian Medical Schools
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53468972017-03-14 The EUROPEP questionnaire for patient’s evaluation of general practice care: Bulgarian experience Dimova, Rositsa Stoyanova, Rumyana Keskinova, Donka Croat Med J Public Health AIM: To validate the Bulgarian EUROPEP-questionnaire and its implementation to measure patient evaluation of general practice care in Bulgarian population. METHODS: A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted at twenty five primary care practices from South-Central Region of Bulgaria. A total of 1000 adult patients aged over 18 years and visiting the practice for more than a year were approached consecutively to take part in the study. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the EUROPEP questionnaire were evaluated. To confirm the construct validity of the questionniare, еxplanatory factor analysis was performed. RESULTS: Cronbach’alpha for “clinical behaviour” is 0.95 and for “organisation of care” 0.81. Factor analysis identifed two factors, which accounted for 77.0% of the total variation in these items. On average, 58.7% of respondents rated the level of care received as excellent. The waiting time in the waiting room was the item most poorly rated (33.8%). The item “keeping patients' records and data confidential” was the most highly rated (88.8%). Patients were less satisfied with “providing quick services for urgent health problems” (78.5% excellent or good) and “getting an appropriate for them appointment” (76.2% excellent or good). CONCLUSION: Two scales with satisfactory psychometric properties were established in the Bulgarian version of the EUROPEP-questionnaire. The study identified areas requiring improvement in general practice, such as reduction in waiting times and obtaining patient’s convenience appointment. Croatian Medical Schools 2017-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5346897/ /pubmed/28252877 http://dx.doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2017.58.63 Text en Copyright © 2017 by the Croatian Medical Journal. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Public Health
Dimova, Rositsa
Stoyanova, Rumyana
Keskinova, Donka
The EUROPEP questionnaire for patient’s evaluation of general practice care: Bulgarian experience
title The EUROPEP questionnaire for patient’s evaluation of general practice care: Bulgarian experience
title_full The EUROPEP questionnaire for patient’s evaluation of general practice care: Bulgarian experience
title_fullStr The EUROPEP questionnaire for patient’s evaluation of general practice care: Bulgarian experience
title_full_unstemmed The EUROPEP questionnaire for patient’s evaluation of general practice care: Bulgarian experience
title_short The EUROPEP questionnaire for patient’s evaluation of general practice care: Bulgarian experience
title_sort europep questionnaire for patient’s evaluation of general practice care: bulgarian experience
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5346897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28252877
http://dx.doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2017.58.63
work_keys_str_mv AT dimovarositsa theeuropepquestionnaireforpatientsevaluationofgeneralpracticecarebulgarianexperience
AT stoyanovarumyana theeuropepquestionnaireforpatientsevaluationofgeneralpracticecarebulgarianexperience
AT keskinovadonka theeuropepquestionnaireforpatientsevaluationofgeneralpracticecarebulgarianexperience
AT dimovarositsa europepquestionnaireforpatientsevaluationofgeneralpracticecarebulgarianexperience
AT stoyanovarumyana europepquestionnaireforpatientsevaluationofgeneralpracticecarebulgarianexperience
AT keskinovadonka europepquestionnaireforpatientsevaluationofgeneralpracticecarebulgarianexperience