Cargando…
The EUROPEP questionnaire for patient’s evaluation of general practice care: Bulgarian experience
AIM: To validate the Bulgarian EUROPEP-questionnaire and its implementation to measure patient evaluation of general practice care in Bulgarian population. METHODS: A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted at twenty five primary care practices from South-Central Region of Bulgaria. A total...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Croatian Medical Schools
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5346897/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28252877 http://dx.doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2017.58.63 |
_version_ | 1782513972051705856 |
---|---|
author | Dimova, Rositsa Stoyanova, Rumyana Keskinova, Donka |
author_facet | Dimova, Rositsa Stoyanova, Rumyana Keskinova, Donka |
author_sort | Dimova, Rositsa |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To validate the Bulgarian EUROPEP-questionnaire and its implementation to measure patient evaluation of general practice care in Bulgarian population. METHODS: A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted at twenty five primary care practices from South-Central Region of Bulgaria. A total of 1000 adult patients aged over 18 years and visiting the practice for more than a year were approached consecutively to take part in the study. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the EUROPEP questionnaire were evaluated. To confirm the construct validity of the questionniare, еxplanatory factor analysis was performed. RESULTS: Cronbach’alpha for “clinical behaviour” is 0.95 and for “organisation of care” 0.81. Factor analysis identifed two factors, which accounted for 77.0% of the total variation in these items. On average, 58.7% of respondents rated the level of care received as excellent. The waiting time in the waiting room was the item most poorly rated (33.8%). The item “keeping patients' records and data confidential” was the most highly rated (88.8%). Patients were less satisfied with “providing quick services for urgent health problems” (78.5% excellent or good) and “getting an appropriate for them appointment” (76.2% excellent or good). CONCLUSION: Two scales with satisfactory psychometric properties were established in the Bulgarian version of the EUROPEP-questionnaire. The study identified areas requiring improvement in general practice, such as reduction in waiting times and obtaining patient’s convenience appointment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5346897 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Croatian Medical Schools |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53468972017-03-14 The EUROPEP questionnaire for patient’s evaluation of general practice care: Bulgarian experience Dimova, Rositsa Stoyanova, Rumyana Keskinova, Donka Croat Med J Public Health AIM: To validate the Bulgarian EUROPEP-questionnaire and its implementation to measure patient evaluation of general practice care in Bulgarian population. METHODS: A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted at twenty five primary care practices from South-Central Region of Bulgaria. A total of 1000 adult patients aged over 18 years and visiting the practice for more than a year were approached consecutively to take part in the study. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the EUROPEP questionnaire were evaluated. To confirm the construct validity of the questionniare, еxplanatory factor analysis was performed. RESULTS: Cronbach’alpha for “clinical behaviour” is 0.95 and for “organisation of care” 0.81. Factor analysis identifed two factors, which accounted for 77.0% of the total variation in these items. On average, 58.7% of respondents rated the level of care received as excellent. The waiting time in the waiting room was the item most poorly rated (33.8%). The item “keeping patients' records and data confidential” was the most highly rated (88.8%). Patients were less satisfied with “providing quick services for urgent health problems” (78.5% excellent or good) and “getting an appropriate for them appointment” (76.2% excellent or good). CONCLUSION: Two scales with satisfactory psychometric properties were established in the Bulgarian version of the EUROPEP-questionnaire. The study identified areas requiring improvement in general practice, such as reduction in waiting times and obtaining patient’s convenience appointment. Croatian Medical Schools 2017-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5346897/ /pubmed/28252877 http://dx.doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2017.58.63 Text en Copyright © 2017 by the Croatian Medical Journal. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Dimova, Rositsa Stoyanova, Rumyana Keskinova, Donka The EUROPEP questionnaire for patient’s evaluation of general practice care: Bulgarian experience |
title | The EUROPEP questionnaire for patient’s evaluation of general practice care: Bulgarian experience |
title_full | The EUROPEP questionnaire for patient’s evaluation of general practice care: Bulgarian experience |
title_fullStr | The EUROPEP questionnaire for patient’s evaluation of general practice care: Bulgarian experience |
title_full_unstemmed | The EUROPEP questionnaire for patient’s evaluation of general practice care: Bulgarian experience |
title_short | The EUROPEP questionnaire for patient’s evaluation of general practice care: Bulgarian experience |
title_sort | europep questionnaire for patient’s evaluation of general practice care: bulgarian experience |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5346897/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28252877 http://dx.doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2017.58.63 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dimovarositsa theeuropepquestionnaireforpatientsevaluationofgeneralpracticecarebulgarianexperience AT stoyanovarumyana theeuropepquestionnaireforpatientsevaluationofgeneralpracticecarebulgarianexperience AT keskinovadonka theeuropepquestionnaireforpatientsevaluationofgeneralpracticecarebulgarianexperience AT dimovarositsa europepquestionnaireforpatientsevaluationofgeneralpracticecarebulgarianexperience AT stoyanovarumyana europepquestionnaireforpatientsevaluationofgeneralpracticecarebulgarianexperience AT keskinovadonka europepquestionnaireforpatientsevaluationofgeneralpracticecarebulgarianexperience |