Cargando…

Risk–Benefit Analysis of Pediatric-Inspired Versus Hyperfractionated Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Doxorubicin, and Dexamethasone Protocols for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Adolescents and Young Adults

Purpose: To estimate the risk–benefit trade-off of a pediatric-inspired regimen versus hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (hyper-CVAD) for first-line treatment of adolescents/young adult (AYA; ages 16–39 years) patients with Philadelphia-negative acute ly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guzauskas, Gregory F., Villa, Kathleen F., Vanhove, Geertrui F., Fisher, Vicki L., Veenstra, David L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5346961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27779442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2016.0049
_version_ 1782513981970186240
author Guzauskas, Gregory F.
Villa, Kathleen F.
Vanhove, Geertrui F.
Fisher, Vicki L.
Veenstra, David L.
author_facet Guzauskas, Gregory F.
Villa, Kathleen F.
Vanhove, Geertrui F.
Fisher, Vicki L.
Veenstra, David L.
author_sort Guzauskas, Gregory F.
collection PubMed
description Purpose: To estimate the risk–benefit trade-off of a pediatric-inspired regimen versus hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (hyper-CVAD) for first-line treatment of adolescents/young adult (AYA; ages 16–39 years) patients with Philadelphia-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Methods: Patient outcomes were simulated using a 6-state Markov model, including complete response (CR), no CR, first relapse, second CR, second relapse, and death. A Weibull distribution was fit to the progression-free survival curve of hyper-CVAD–treated AYA patients from a single-center study, and comparable patient data from a retrospective study of pediatric regimen–treated AYA patients were utilized to estimate a relative progression difference (hazard ratio = 0.51) and model survival differences. Health-state utilities were estimated based on treatment stage, with an assumption that the pediatric protocol had 0.10 disutility compared with hyper-CVAD before the maintenance phase of treatment. Total life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were compared between treatment protocols at 1, 5, and 10 years, with additional probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Results: Treatment with the pediatric-inspired protocol was associated with a 0.04 increase in life-years, but a 0.01 decrease in QALYs at 1 year. By years 5 and 10, the pediatric-inspired protocol resulted in 0.18 and 0.24 increase in life-years and 0.25 and 0.32 increase in QALYs, respectively, relative to hyper-CVAD. The lower quality of life associated with the induction and intensification phases of pediatric treatment was offset by more favorable progression-free survival and overall survival relative to hyper-CVAD. Conclusions: Our exploratory analysis suggests that, compared with hyper-CVAD, pediatric-inspired protocols may increase life-years throughout treatment stages and QALYs in the long term.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5346961
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53469612017-03-13 Risk–Benefit Analysis of Pediatric-Inspired Versus Hyperfractionated Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Doxorubicin, and Dexamethasone Protocols for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Adolescents and Young Adults Guzauskas, Gregory F. Villa, Kathleen F. Vanhove, Geertrui F. Fisher, Vicki L. Veenstra, David L. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol Original Articles Purpose: To estimate the risk–benefit trade-off of a pediatric-inspired regimen versus hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (hyper-CVAD) for first-line treatment of adolescents/young adult (AYA; ages 16–39 years) patients with Philadelphia-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Methods: Patient outcomes were simulated using a 6-state Markov model, including complete response (CR), no CR, first relapse, second CR, second relapse, and death. A Weibull distribution was fit to the progression-free survival curve of hyper-CVAD–treated AYA patients from a single-center study, and comparable patient data from a retrospective study of pediatric regimen–treated AYA patients were utilized to estimate a relative progression difference (hazard ratio = 0.51) and model survival differences. Health-state utilities were estimated based on treatment stage, with an assumption that the pediatric protocol had 0.10 disutility compared with hyper-CVAD before the maintenance phase of treatment. Total life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were compared between treatment protocols at 1, 5, and 10 years, with additional probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Results: Treatment with the pediatric-inspired protocol was associated with a 0.04 increase in life-years, but a 0.01 decrease in QALYs at 1 year. By years 5 and 10, the pediatric-inspired protocol resulted in 0.18 and 0.24 increase in life-years and 0.25 and 0.32 increase in QALYs, respectively, relative to hyper-CVAD. The lower quality of life associated with the induction and intensification phases of pediatric treatment was offset by more favorable progression-free survival and overall survival relative to hyper-CVAD. Conclusions: Our exploratory analysis suggests that, compared with hyper-CVAD, pediatric-inspired protocols may increase life-years throughout treatment stages and QALYs in the long term. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2017-03-01 2017-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5346961/ /pubmed/27779442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2016.0049 Text en © Gregory F. Guzauskas et al., 2017; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Guzauskas, Gregory F.
Villa, Kathleen F.
Vanhove, Geertrui F.
Fisher, Vicki L.
Veenstra, David L.
Risk–Benefit Analysis of Pediatric-Inspired Versus Hyperfractionated Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Doxorubicin, and Dexamethasone Protocols for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Adolescents and Young Adults
title Risk–Benefit Analysis of Pediatric-Inspired Versus Hyperfractionated Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Doxorubicin, and Dexamethasone Protocols for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Adolescents and Young Adults
title_full Risk–Benefit Analysis of Pediatric-Inspired Versus Hyperfractionated Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Doxorubicin, and Dexamethasone Protocols for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Adolescents and Young Adults
title_fullStr Risk–Benefit Analysis of Pediatric-Inspired Versus Hyperfractionated Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Doxorubicin, and Dexamethasone Protocols for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Adolescents and Young Adults
title_full_unstemmed Risk–Benefit Analysis of Pediatric-Inspired Versus Hyperfractionated Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Doxorubicin, and Dexamethasone Protocols for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Adolescents and Young Adults
title_short Risk–Benefit Analysis of Pediatric-Inspired Versus Hyperfractionated Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Doxorubicin, and Dexamethasone Protocols for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Adolescents and Young Adults
title_sort risk–benefit analysis of pediatric-inspired versus hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone protocols for acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adolescents and young adults
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5346961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27779442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2016.0049
work_keys_str_mv AT guzauskasgregoryf riskbenefitanalysisofpediatricinspiredversushyperfractionatedcyclophosphamidevincristinedoxorubicinanddexamethasoneprotocolsforacutelymphoblasticleukemiainadolescentsandyoungadults
AT villakathleenf riskbenefitanalysisofpediatricinspiredversushyperfractionatedcyclophosphamidevincristinedoxorubicinanddexamethasoneprotocolsforacutelymphoblasticleukemiainadolescentsandyoungadults
AT vanhovegeertruif riskbenefitanalysisofpediatricinspiredversushyperfractionatedcyclophosphamidevincristinedoxorubicinanddexamethasoneprotocolsforacutelymphoblasticleukemiainadolescentsandyoungadults
AT fishervickil riskbenefitanalysisofpediatricinspiredversushyperfractionatedcyclophosphamidevincristinedoxorubicinanddexamethasoneprotocolsforacutelymphoblasticleukemiainadolescentsandyoungadults
AT veenstradavidl riskbenefitanalysisofpediatricinspiredversushyperfractionatedcyclophosphamidevincristinedoxorubicinanddexamethasoneprotocolsforacutelymphoblasticleukemiainadolescentsandyoungadults