Cargando…

PET Cell Tracking Using (18)F-FLT is Not Limited by Local Reuptake of Free Radiotracer

Assessing the retention of cell therapies following implantation is vital and often achieved by labelling cells with 2′-[(18)F]-fluoro-2′-deoxy-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG). However, this approach is limited by local retention of cell-effluxed radiotracer. Here, in a preclinical model of critical limb isch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: MacAskill, Mark G., Tavares, Adriana S., Wu, Junxi, Lucatelli, Christophe, Mountford, Joanne C., Baker, Andrew H., Newby, David E., Hadoke, Patrick W. F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5347009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28287126
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep44233
Descripción
Sumario:Assessing the retention of cell therapies following implantation is vital and often achieved by labelling cells with 2′-[(18)F]-fluoro-2′-deoxy-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG). However, this approach is limited by local retention of cell-effluxed radiotracer. Here, in a preclinical model of critical limb ischemia, we assessed a novel method of cell tracking using 3′-deoxy-3′-L-[(18)F]-fluorothymidine ((18)F-FLT); a clinically available radiotracer which we hypothesise will result in minimal local radiotracer reuptake and allow a more accurate estimation of cell retention. Human endothelial cells (HUVECs) were incubated with (18)F-FDG or (18)F-FLT and cell characteristics were evaluated. Dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) images were acquired post-injection of free (18)F-FDG/(18)F-FLT or (18)F-FDG/(18)F-FLT-labelled HUVECs, following the surgical induction of mouse hind-limb ischemia. In vitro, radiotracer incorporation and efflux was similar with no effect on cell viability, function or proliferation under optimised conditions (5 MBq/mL, 60 min). Injection of free radiotracer demonstrated a faster clearance of (18)F-FLT from the injection site vs. (18)F-FDG (p ≤ 0.001), indicating local cellular uptake. Using (18)F-FLT-labelling, estimation of HUVEC retention within the engraftment site 4 hr post-administration was 24.5 ± 3.2%. PET cell tracking using (18)F-FLT labelling is an improved approach vs. (18)F-FDG as it is not susceptible to local host cell reuptake, resulting in a more accurate estimation of cell retention.