Cargando…

Art Perception in the Museum: How We Spend Time and Space in Art Exhibitions

Aesthetics research aiming at understanding art experience is an emerging field; however, most research is conducted in labs without access to real artworks, without the social context of a museum and without the presence of other persons. The present article replicates and complements key findings...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Carbon, Claus-Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5347319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28321289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2041669517694184
_version_ 1782514042597801984
author Carbon, Claus-Christian
author_facet Carbon, Claus-Christian
author_sort Carbon, Claus-Christian
collection PubMed
description Aesthetics research aiming at understanding art experience is an emerging field; however, most research is conducted in labs without access to real artworks, without the social context of a museum and without the presence of other persons. The present article replicates and complements key findings of art perception in museum contexts. When observing museum visitors (N = 225; 126 female, M(age) = 43.3 years) while perceiving a series of six Gerhard Richter paintings of various sizes (0.26–3.20 sq. m) in a temporary art exhibition in January and February 2015 showing 28 paintings in total, we revealed patterns compatible to previous research. The mean time taken in viewing artworks was much longer than was mostly realized in lab contexts, here 32.9 s (Mdn = 25.4 s). We were also able to replicate visitors spending more time on viewing artworks when attending in groups of people. Additionally, we uncovered a close positive relationship (r(2 )= .929) between canvas size and viewing distance, ranging on average between 1.49 and 2.12 m (M = 1.72 m). We also found that more than half of the visitors returned to paintings, especially those people who had not previously paid too much attention at the initial viewing. After adding the times of returning viewers, each picture was viewed longer than had been estimated in previous research (M = 50.5 s, Mdn = 43.0 s). Results are discussed in the context of current art perception theories, focusing on the need for the ecologically valid testing of artworks in aesthetics research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5347319
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53473192017-03-20 Art Perception in the Museum: How We Spend Time and Space in Art Exhibitions Carbon, Claus-Christian Iperception Article Aesthetics research aiming at understanding art experience is an emerging field; however, most research is conducted in labs without access to real artworks, without the social context of a museum and without the presence of other persons. The present article replicates and complements key findings of art perception in museum contexts. When observing museum visitors (N = 225; 126 female, M(age) = 43.3 years) while perceiving a series of six Gerhard Richter paintings of various sizes (0.26–3.20 sq. m) in a temporary art exhibition in January and February 2015 showing 28 paintings in total, we revealed patterns compatible to previous research. The mean time taken in viewing artworks was much longer than was mostly realized in lab contexts, here 32.9 s (Mdn = 25.4 s). We were also able to replicate visitors spending more time on viewing artworks when attending in groups of people. Additionally, we uncovered a close positive relationship (r(2 )= .929) between canvas size and viewing distance, ranging on average between 1.49 and 2.12 m (M = 1.72 m). We also found that more than half of the visitors returned to paintings, especially those people who had not previously paid too much attention at the initial viewing. After adding the times of returning viewers, each picture was viewed longer than had been estimated in previous research (M = 50.5 s, Mdn = 43.0 s). Results are discussed in the context of current art perception theories, focusing on the need for the ecologically valid testing of artworks in aesthetics research. SAGE Publications 2017-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5347319/ /pubmed/28321289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2041669517694184 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Carbon, Claus-Christian
Art Perception in the Museum: How We Spend Time and Space in Art Exhibitions
title Art Perception in the Museum: How We Spend Time and Space in Art Exhibitions
title_full Art Perception in the Museum: How We Spend Time and Space in Art Exhibitions
title_fullStr Art Perception in the Museum: How We Spend Time and Space in Art Exhibitions
title_full_unstemmed Art Perception in the Museum: How We Spend Time and Space in Art Exhibitions
title_short Art Perception in the Museum: How We Spend Time and Space in Art Exhibitions
title_sort art perception in the museum: how we spend time and space in art exhibitions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5347319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28321289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2041669517694184
work_keys_str_mv AT carbonclauschristian artperceptioninthemuseumhowwespendtimeandspaceinartexhibitions