Cargando…

The effect of object-centered instructions in Cartesian and polar coordinates on saccade vector

Express saccades (ES) are the most reflexive saccadic eye movements, with very short reaction times of 70–110 ms. It is likely that ES have the shortest saccade reaction times (SRTs) possible given the known physiological and anatomical delays present in sensory and motor systems. Nevertheless, it h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Edelman, Jay A., Mieses, Alexa M., Konnova, Kira, Shiu, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5347663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28265650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/17.3.2
_version_ 1782514081766309888
author Edelman, Jay A.
Mieses, Alexa M.
Konnova, Kira
Shiu, David
author_facet Edelman, Jay A.
Mieses, Alexa M.
Konnova, Kira
Shiu, David
author_sort Edelman, Jay A.
collection PubMed
description Express saccades (ES) are the most reflexive saccadic eye movements, with very short reaction times of 70–110 ms. It is likely that ES have the shortest saccade reaction times (SRTs) possible given the known physiological and anatomical delays present in sensory and motor systems. Nevertheless, it has been demonstrated that a vector displacement of ES to spatially extended stimuli can be influenced by spatial cognition. Edelman, Kristjansson, and Nakayama (2007) found that when two horizontally separated visual stimuli appear at a random location, the spatial vector, but not the reaction time, of human ES is strongly influenced by an instruction to make a saccade to one side (either left or right) of a visual stimulus array. Presently, we attempt to extend these findings of cognitive effects on saccades in three ways: (a) determining whether ES could be affected by other types of spatial instructions: vertical, polar amplitude, and polar direction; (b) determining whether these spatial effects increased with practice; and (c) determining how these effects depended on SRTs. The results demonstrate that both types of Cartesian as well as polar amplitude instructions strongly affect ES vector, but only modestly affect SRTs. Polar direction instructions had sizable effects only on nonreflexive saccades where the visual stimuli could be viewed for several hundred milliseconds prior to saccade execution. Short- (trial order within a block) and long-term (experience across several sessions) practice had little effect, though the effect of instruction increased with SRT. Such findings suggest a generalized, innate ability of cognition to affect the most reflexive saccadic eye movements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5347663
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53476632017-03-16 The effect of object-centered instructions in Cartesian and polar coordinates on saccade vector Edelman, Jay A. Mieses, Alexa M. Konnova, Kira Shiu, David J Vis Article Express saccades (ES) are the most reflexive saccadic eye movements, with very short reaction times of 70–110 ms. It is likely that ES have the shortest saccade reaction times (SRTs) possible given the known physiological and anatomical delays present in sensory and motor systems. Nevertheless, it has been demonstrated that a vector displacement of ES to spatially extended stimuli can be influenced by spatial cognition. Edelman, Kristjansson, and Nakayama (2007) found that when two horizontally separated visual stimuli appear at a random location, the spatial vector, but not the reaction time, of human ES is strongly influenced by an instruction to make a saccade to one side (either left or right) of a visual stimulus array. Presently, we attempt to extend these findings of cognitive effects on saccades in three ways: (a) determining whether ES could be affected by other types of spatial instructions: vertical, polar amplitude, and polar direction; (b) determining whether these spatial effects increased with practice; and (c) determining how these effects depended on SRTs. The results demonstrate that both types of Cartesian as well as polar amplitude instructions strongly affect ES vector, but only modestly affect SRTs. Polar direction instructions had sizable effects only on nonreflexive saccades where the visual stimuli could be viewed for several hundred milliseconds prior to saccade execution. Short- (trial order within a block) and long-term (experience across several sessions) practice had little effect, though the effect of instruction increased with SRT. Such findings suggest a generalized, innate ability of cognition to affect the most reflexive saccadic eye movements. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2017-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5347663/ /pubmed/28265650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/17.3.2 Text en Copyright 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Edelman, Jay A.
Mieses, Alexa M.
Konnova, Kira
Shiu, David
The effect of object-centered instructions in Cartesian and polar coordinates on saccade vector
title The effect of object-centered instructions in Cartesian and polar coordinates on saccade vector
title_full The effect of object-centered instructions in Cartesian and polar coordinates on saccade vector
title_fullStr The effect of object-centered instructions in Cartesian and polar coordinates on saccade vector
title_full_unstemmed The effect of object-centered instructions in Cartesian and polar coordinates on saccade vector
title_short The effect of object-centered instructions in Cartesian and polar coordinates on saccade vector
title_sort effect of object-centered instructions in cartesian and polar coordinates on saccade vector
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5347663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28265650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/17.3.2
work_keys_str_mv AT edelmanjaya theeffectofobjectcenteredinstructionsincartesianandpolarcoordinatesonsaccadevector
AT miesesalexam theeffectofobjectcenteredinstructionsincartesianandpolarcoordinatesonsaccadevector
AT konnovakira theeffectofobjectcenteredinstructionsincartesianandpolarcoordinatesonsaccadevector
AT shiudavid theeffectofobjectcenteredinstructionsincartesianandpolarcoordinatesonsaccadevector
AT edelmanjaya effectofobjectcenteredinstructionsincartesianandpolarcoordinatesonsaccadevector
AT miesesalexam effectofobjectcenteredinstructionsincartesianandpolarcoordinatesonsaccadevector
AT konnovakira effectofobjectcenteredinstructionsincartesianandpolarcoordinatesonsaccadevector
AT shiudavid effectofobjectcenteredinstructionsincartesianandpolarcoordinatesonsaccadevector