Cargando…
Cervical spine reposition errors after cervical flexion and extension
BACKGROUND: Upright head and neck position has been frequently applied as baseline for diagnosis of neck problems. However, the variance of the position after cervical motions has never been demonstrated. Thus, it is unclear if the baseline position varies evenly across the cervical joints. The purp...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5347814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28288610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1454-z |
_version_ | 1782514116663967744 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Xu Lindstroem, René Carstens, Niels Peter Bak Graven-Nielsen, Thomas |
author_facet | Wang, Xu Lindstroem, René Carstens, Niels Peter Bak Graven-Nielsen, Thomas |
author_sort | Wang, Xu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Upright head and neck position has been frequently applied as baseline for diagnosis of neck problems. However, the variance of the position after cervical motions has never been demonstrated. Thus, it is unclear if the baseline position varies evenly across the cervical joints. The purpose was to assess reposition errors of upright cervical spine. METHODS: Cervical reposition errors were measured in twenty healthy subjects (6 females) using video-fluoroscopy. Two flexion movements were performed with a 20 s interval, the same was repeated for extension, with an interval of 5 min between flexion and extension movements. Cervical joint positions were assessed with anatomical landmarks and external markers in a Matlab program. Reposition errors were extracted in degrees (initial position minus reposition) as constant errors (CEs) and absolute errors (AEs). RESULTS: Twelve of twenty-eight CEs (7 joints times 4 repositions) exceeded the minimal detectable change (MDC), while all AEs exceeded the MDC. Averaged AEs across the cervical joints were larger after 5 min’ intervals compared to 20 s intervals (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate single joint reposition errors of the cervical spine. The cervical spine returns to the upright positions with a 2° average absolute difference after cervical flexion and extension movements in healthy adults. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-017-1454-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5347814 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53478142017-03-14 Cervical spine reposition errors after cervical flexion and extension Wang, Xu Lindstroem, René Carstens, Niels Peter Bak Graven-Nielsen, Thomas BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Upright head and neck position has been frequently applied as baseline for diagnosis of neck problems. However, the variance of the position after cervical motions has never been demonstrated. Thus, it is unclear if the baseline position varies evenly across the cervical joints. The purpose was to assess reposition errors of upright cervical spine. METHODS: Cervical reposition errors were measured in twenty healthy subjects (6 females) using video-fluoroscopy. Two flexion movements were performed with a 20 s interval, the same was repeated for extension, with an interval of 5 min between flexion and extension movements. Cervical joint positions were assessed with anatomical landmarks and external markers in a Matlab program. Reposition errors were extracted in degrees (initial position minus reposition) as constant errors (CEs) and absolute errors (AEs). RESULTS: Twelve of twenty-eight CEs (7 joints times 4 repositions) exceeded the minimal detectable change (MDC), while all AEs exceeded the MDC. Averaged AEs across the cervical joints were larger after 5 min’ intervals compared to 20 s intervals (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate single joint reposition errors of the cervical spine. The cervical spine returns to the upright positions with a 2° average absolute difference after cervical flexion and extension movements in healthy adults. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-017-1454-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5347814/ /pubmed/28288610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1454-z Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wang, Xu Lindstroem, René Carstens, Niels Peter Bak Graven-Nielsen, Thomas Cervical spine reposition errors after cervical flexion and extension |
title | Cervical spine reposition errors after cervical flexion and extension |
title_full | Cervical spine reposition errors after cervical flexion and extension |
title_fullStr | Cervical spine reposition errors after cervical flexion and extension |
title_full_unstemmed | Cervical spine reposition errors after cervical flexion and extension |
title_short | Cervical spine reposition errors after cervical flexion and extension |
title_sort | cervical spine reposition errors after cervical flexion and extension |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5347814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28288610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1454-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangxu cervicalspinerepositionerrorsaftercervicalflexionandextension AT lindstroemrene cervicalspinerepositionerrorsaftercervicalflexionandextension AT carstensnielspeterbak cervicalspinerepositionerrorsaftercervicalflexionandextension AT gravennielsenthomas cervicalspinerepositionerrorsaftercervicalflexionandextension |